Advertisement

Mainstream Classrooms as Engaging Spaces for Emergent Bilinguals: SFL Theory, Catalyst for Change

  • María Estela BriskEmail author
  • Marcela Ossa Parra
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 33)

Abstract

This chapter discusses how a sustained collaboration among a principal, researchers and teachers supported a shift in the monolingual culture of an elementary school. Specifically, the study explores how a longitudinal professional development initiative supported monolingual teachers in developing effective writing instruction for emergent bilingual learners. Data was collected through participant-observation during the literacy block of three teachers who had emergent bilinguals in their classroom. Drawing on grounded theory, videotape transcripts and field notes were analyzed to characterize teachers’ practices, and their emergent bilingual students’ participation. Findings point to the ways in which their SFL-informed writing approach with its Teaching and Learning Cycle resulted in full participation of emergent bilinguals and the use of hybrid language practices in previously English-only classroom environments.

Keywords

Systemic Functional Linguistics Teaching and Learning Cycle Translanguaging Mainstream Classrooms Emergent Bilinguals 

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  2. Brisk, M. E. (2006). Bilingual education: From compensatory to quality schooling (Second ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Brisk, M. E. (2015). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre-based pedagogy for k-5 classrooms. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bunch, G. C., Walqui, A., & Pearson, P. D. (2014). Complex text and new common standards in the United States: Pedagogical implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 533–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2011). Teaching English Learners. http://www.ctc.ca.gov/credentials/CREDS/english-learners.html. Accessed 26 July 2015.
  6. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Coady, M.R., Harper, C., de Jong, E.J. (2015). Aiming for Equity: Preparing mainstream teachers for inclusion or inclusive classrooms? TESOL Quarterly, DOI:  10.1002/tesq.223.
  8. Daniello, F. (2014). Elementary grade teachers using systemic functional linguistics to inform genre-based writing pedagogy. In L. C. De Oliveira & J. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in U.S. classrooms and contexts (pp. 40–54). Equinox: Sheffield, U. K.Google Scholar
  9. de Jong, E. J. (2011). Foundations of multilingualism in education: From principles to practice. Philadelphia: Caslon Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. T. (2012). Teaching language in context. OUP: Melbourne.Google Scholar
  11. Dooly, M. (2005). How aware are they? Research into teachers’ attitudes about linguistic diversity. Language Awareness, 14(2–3), 97–111. doi: 10.1080/09658410508668827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fantini, A. E. (1985). Language acquisition of a bilingual child: A sociolinguistic perspective. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
  13. Flores, N., & Shissel, J. L. (2014). Dynamic bilingualism as the norm: Envisioning a heteroglossic approach to standards-based reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 454–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Florida Department of Education. (2011). Technical Assistance for teacher education: Meeting the needs of English Language Learners (ELL) in Florida. http://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7719/urlt/0071749-mnellf.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2015.
  15. García, O. (2014). Countering the dual: Transglossia, dynamic bilingualism and translanguaging in education. In R. Rudby & L. Alsagoff (Eds.), The global-local Interface, language choice and hybridity (pp. 100–118). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  16. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. García-Nevarez, A. G., Stafford, M. E., & Arias, B. (2005). Arizona elementary teachers’ attitudes toward English language learners and use of Spanish in classroom instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 29(2), 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gebhard, M. (2005). School reform, hybrid discourses, and second language literacies. TESOL Quarterly, 39(2), 187–210. doi: 10.2307/3588308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  20. Heugh, K. (2015). Epistemologies in multilingual education: Translanguaging and genre – Companions in conversation with policy and practice. Language and Education, 29(3), 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopewell, S. (2011). Leveraging bilingualism to accelerate English reading comprehension. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(5), 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hornberger, N. (2005). Opening and filling up implementational and ideological spaces in heritage language education. The Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 605–609.Google Scholar
  23. Hornberger, N., & Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: A biliteracy lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kamberelis, G. (2001). Producing heteroglossic classroom (micro)cultures through hybrid discourse practice. Linguistics and Education, 12(1), 85–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karabenick, S. A., & Noda, P. A. C. (2004). Professional development implications of teachers' beliefs and attitudes toward English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, J. S., & Oxelson, E. (2006). “It’s not my job”: K–12 teacher attitudes toward students’ heritage language maintenance. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 453–477. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2006.10162885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Link, H. K. (2011). Hola means hello: The intersection of language ideologies and language policies in a school of the new Latino diaspora. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 26(1), 101–120.Google Scholar
  28. Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 56–72). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lukin, A., Moore, A., Herke, M., Wegener, R., & Wu, C. (2008). Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and Human Sciences, 4(2), 187–213.Google Scholar
  31. Manyak, P. C. (2002). Participation, hybridity, and carnival: A situated analysis of a dynamic literacy practice in a primary-grade English immersion class. Journal of Literacy Research, 33(3), 423–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manyak, P. C. (2004). “what did she say?” translation in a primary-grade English immersion class. Multicultural Perspectives, 6(1), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manyak, P. C. (2006). Fostering biliteracy in a monolingual milieu: Reflections on two counter-hegemonic English immersion classes. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6(3), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar
  35. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2015). Regulations for Educator Licensure and Preparation Program Approval. http://www.doe.mass.edu/lawsregs/603cmr7.html?section=14. Accessed 10 Oct 2015.
  36. Penfield, J. (1987). ESL: The regular classroom teacher’s perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge, and pedagogy in the Sydney school. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  38. Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86–123). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  39. Salas, C. M. V., Flores, B. B., & Smith, H. L. (2005). Preservice teachers’ attitudes toward language diversity in south Texas. Teacher Education & Practice, 18(3), 297–314.Google Scholar
  40. Soltero-Gonzalez, L. (2009). The hybrid literacy practices of young immigrant children: Lessons learned from an English-only preschool classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1–2), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. The United States Department of Justice. (2011). Statement agreement between the United States of America and the Boston public school. http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2011/03/28/bostonsettle.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2015.
  42. Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  43. Turkan, S., De Oliveira, L. C., Lee, O., & Phelps, G. (2014). Proposing a knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116(030308), 1–30.Google Scholar
  44. Valdés, G., & Castellón, M. (2011). English language learners in American schools: Characteristics and challenges. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 18–34). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. van Lier, L., & Walqui, A. (2012). Language and the common Core standards. In K. Hakuta & M. Santos (Eds.), Understanding language: Commissioned papers on language and literacy issues in the common Core state standards and next generation science standards (pp. 44–51). Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  46. Walker, A., Shafer, J., & Iiams, M. (2004). “not in my classroom”: Teacher attitudes towards English language learners in the mainstream classroom. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 130–160.Google Scholar
  47. WIDA (2017). ACCESS for ELLS. 2.0 Summative Assessment. ACCESS. https://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS20.aspx. Accessed 15 Jan 2017.
  48. Wong-Fillmore, L., & Snow, C. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. Snow, et al. (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–53). Washington D.C: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  49. Youngs, C. S., & Youngs, G. A. (2001). Predictors of mainstream teachers’ attitudes toward ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations