Abstract
Drawing on examples of how two teacher educators have developed a critical SFL approach to teacher education, this chapter discusses specific principles of critical SFL to guide analysis of texts in the content areas and planning instruction that integrates these principles. It shows how we have prepared elementary and secondary teachers to use CSFL to plan instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse students, especially English language learners. The chapter concludes by providing some reflections on this process and a few guidelines for teacher educators to integrate this approach into teacher education programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Athanases, S. Z., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2011). Toward program-wide coherence in preparing teachers to teach and advocate for English language learners. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 195–215). New York: Routledge.
Avalos, M. A., Medina, E., & Secada, W. (2015). Planning for instruction: Increasing multilingual learners’ access to algebraic word problems and visual graphics. In A. Bright, H. Hansen-Thomas, & L. C. de Oliveira (Eds.), The common Core state standards in mathematics and English language learners: High school (pp. 5–28). Alexandria: TESOL Press.
Bailey, A. L., & Butler, F. A. (2002). An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document. In Center for the Study of evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Los Angeles: Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California.
Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37, 298-341. doi: 10.3102/0091732X12461772
Carpenter, B., Achugar, M., Walter, D., Earhart, M. (2015). Developing teachers’ critical language awareness: A case study of guided participation. Linguistics and Education, 32, 82-97. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2015.03.016
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
Daniello, F. (2014). Elementary grade teachers using systemic functional linguistics to inform genre-based writing instruction. In L. C. de Oliveira & J. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in U.S. classrooms and contexts (pp. 40–54). Bristol: Equinox Publishing.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
de Oliveira, L. C. (2010). Nouns in history: Packaging information, expanding explanations, and structuring reasoning. The History Teacher, 43(2), 191–203.
de Oliveira, L. C. (2013). The language demands of word problems for English language learners. In S. Celedón-Pattichis & N. Ramirez (Eds.), Beyond good teaching: Advancing mathematics education for ELLs (pp. 195–205). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
de Oliveira, L. C., & Lan, S. W. (2014). Writing science in an upper elementary classroom: A genre-based approach to teaching English language learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25(1), 23–39.
de Oliveira, L. C., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2015). Focus on grammar and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Derewianka, B. (1991). Exploring how texts work. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.
Galguera, T. (2011). Participant structures as professional learning tasks and the development of pedagogical language knowledge among preservice teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38, 85–106.
Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K-12 schools: A response to school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 45–55.
Gee, J. (2002). Literacies, identities and discourses. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 159–175). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Harman, R., & Simmons, A. (2014). Critical systemic functional linguistics and literary narratives in subject English: Promoting language awareness and social action among K-12 students. In L. C. de Oliveira & J. G. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in U.S. classrooms and contexts (pp. 75–91). Bristol: Equinox Publishing.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hodgson-Drysdale, T. (2016). Teaching writing through genres and language. In L. C. de Oliveira & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing in elementary classrooms: Instructional issues, content-area writing, and teacher education (pp. 69–87). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lucas, T., & Grinberg, J. (2008). Responding to linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 606–636). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Martin, J. R. (1993). Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 221–267). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2005). Designing literacy pedagogy: Scaffolding asymmetries. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, & J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language (pp. 251–280). London: Equinox.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
Massey, D. D. (2015). Reading history: Moving from memorizing facts to critical thinking. In K. L. Santi & D. K. Reed (Eds.), Improving reading comprehension of middle and high school students (pp. 19–47). New York: Springer.
MacDonald, R., & Molle, D. (2015). Creating meaning through key practices in English language arts: Integrating practice, content, language. In L. C. de Oliveira, M. Klassen, & M. Maune (Eds.), The common Core state standards in English language arts for English language learners (pp. 39–52). Alexandria: TESOL Press.
Migration Policy Institute (2015). U.S. Immigrant population and share over time, 1850-present. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/immigrant-population-over-time?width=1000&height=850&iframe=true. Access 31 July 2015.
Moschkovich, J. N. (Ed.). (2010). Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research. Charlotte: Information Age.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write/reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. London: Equinox Publishing.
Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86–123). New York: Longman.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 139–159.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(1), 153–170.
Unsworth, L. (1999). Developing critical understanding of the specialized language of school science and history texts: A functional grammatical perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(7), 508–521.
Wineburg, S. (1999). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Phi Delta Kappa, 80(7), 658–665.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Oliveira, L.C., Avalos, M.A. (2018). Critical SFL Praxis Among Teacher Candidates: Using Systemic Functional Linguistics in K-12 Teacher Education. In: Harman, R. (eds) Bilingual Learners and Social Equity. Educational Linguistics, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60951-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60953-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)