Critical SFL Praxis Principles in English Language Arts Education: Engaging Pre-service Teachers in Reflective Practice
- 793 Downloads
This chapter describes a critical SFL praxis approach for English Language Arts pre-service teacher education that focuses on the development of conceptual tools to foster productive disciplinary engagement. Teachers need to develop an adaptive expertise to guide their decisions in the classroom. The appropriation of conceptual tools contributes to the development of adaptive expertise required by responsive teachers in multilingual classrooms. We present examples of the educational experience of pre-service teachers to illustrate how in these activities learners “use grammar to think” (Halliday MAK, On grammar and grammatics. In: Webster J (ed) On grammar: volume 1: the collected works of M.A.K Halliday. London, Continuum, pp 384–417, 2002 ). These activities incorporate the analysis, reflection, abstract conceptualization and application of authentic language use, grammar in the wild. Pre-service teachers see critical SFL conceptual tools in action and engage in analysis through supportive activities with expert facilitation. The conclusion provides an outline of the research project exploring the continuation of this teacher education during the practicum experience.
KeywordsSFL critical praxis English Language Arts Grammar Conceptual tools Pre-service teacher education
- Achugar, M., & Carpenter, B. (2012). Developing disciplinary literacy in a multilingual history classroom. Linguistics and Education, 23, 262–276. doi: http://dx.doiorg/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.002Google Scholar
- Achugar, M., & Carpenter, B. (2014). Tracking movement toward academic language in multilingual classrooms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 60–71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.002
- American College Testing [ACT]. (2006). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. http://www.act.org/path/policy/pdf/reading_report.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2014.
- American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Educational Disparities. (2012). Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understanding and reducing disparities. http://www.apa.org/ed/resources/racial-disparities.aspx. Accessed 16 Nov 2014.
- Bourdieu, P. (2006). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, B., Achugar, M., Walter, D., & Earhardt, M. (2015). Developing teachers’ critical language awareness: A case study of guided participation. Linguistics and Education, 32, 82-97. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.03.016
- Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. n.d.. http://www.corestandards.org/standards-in-your-state/. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
- Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to functional linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Engeström, R. (2014). The interplay of developmental and dialogical epistemologies. Outlines-Critical Practice Studies, 15(2), 119–138.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). The users and uses of language. In M. A. K. Halliday, A. McIntosh, & P. Strevens (Eds.), The linguistic sciences and language teaching (pp. 75–110). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). On grammar and Grammatics. In J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar: Volume 1, The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday (pp. 384–417). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hancock, C. (2005). Meaning centered grammar. SUNY, Albany: Equinox.Google Scholar
- Hasan, R. (1996a). Literacy, everyday talk and society. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 377–424). Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
- Hasan, R. (1996b). Ways of saying: Ways of meaning. In C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying: Ways of meaning. Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (pp. 191–242). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
- Hasan, R. (1996c). What kind of resource is language? In C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying: Ways of meaning. Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (pp. 13–36). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
- Hasan, R. (2004). Reading picture reading: A study in ideology and inference. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches (pp. 43–75). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- McConachie, S., & Apodaca, R. (2010). Embedding disciplinary literacy: Leadership and professional learning. In S. McConachie & A. Petrosky (Eds.), Content matters: A disciplinary literacy approach to improving student learning (pp. 163–196). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Nocon, H., & Robinson, E. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ appropriation of conceptual tools. Outline-Critical Practice Studies, 15(12), 93–118.Google Scholar
- Resnick, L. (2010). Foreword. In S. McConachie & A. Petrosky (Eds.), Content matters: A disciplinary literacy approach to improving student learning (pp. vii–viii). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling. A functional linguistic perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
- Tellez, K., & Waxman, H. (2005). Quality teachers for English language learners. Prepared for the laboratory for student success. Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education. http://www.temple.edu/LSS. Accessed 22 Nov 2014.