Critical Praxis, Design and Reflection Literacy: A Lesson in Multimodality
- 738 Downloads
In this chapter, I explore a critical praxis grounded in social semiotics that is distinct from the traditions of critical literacy in a) its emphasis on the capacity to create and b) its explicit attention to the range of semiotic resources with which we communicate. Drawing on the concept of design put forward by The New London Group and on the concept of reflection literacy as described by Hasan, I put forward the tenets of such a praxis before illustrating the ideas using classroom data from a national SSHRC-funded study of multiliterate pedagogies. The examples powerfully demonstrate students’ capacity to engage with and remake sophisticated meanings not only to achieve sanctioned curricular goals, but also for purposes they have charted independently.
KeywordsMultimodality Critical praxis Multiliteracies Mediation Social semiotics Reflection literacy
- Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–14). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bell, W. (1999). Zack. Toronto: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bruni, F. (2016). Rethinking college admissions. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/20/opinion/rethinking-college-admissions.html. Accessed 2 Jan 2016.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.Google Scholar
- Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). Some basic concepts of educational linguistics. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and education: The collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, V. 9 (pp. 341–353). New York: Continuum. (Original work published 1988).Google Scholar
- Harvard Graduate School of Education. (2016). Turning the tide: Inspiring concern for others and the common good through college admissions. Making Caring Common Project. http://mcc.gse.harvard.edu/files/gse-mcc/files/20160120_mcc_ttt_report_interactive.pdf?m=1453303517. Accessed 19 Jan 2016.
- Hasan, R. (1996). Literacy, everyday talk and society. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 377–424). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Hasan, R. (2004). The concept of semiotic mediation: Perspectives from Bernstein’s sociology. In J. Muller, B. Davies, & A. Morais (Eds.), Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein (pp. 30–43). New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
- Hasan, R. (2005). Reading picture reading: A study in ideology and inference. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language, society and consciousness (pp. 228–255). Oakville: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Hasan, R. (2011). Globalization, literacy and ideology. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and education: Learning and teaching in society (pp. 207–231). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
- Kress, G. (2000). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153–161). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1996).Google Scholar
- Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (Eds.). (2005). Making things public. Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(5), 448–461.Google Scholar
- Moran, M. J. (n.d.-a). Term one – Literature circles: Reflections. The Multiliteracy Project. http://www.multiliteracies.ca/index.php/folio/viewDocument/110/12959. Accessed 6 Jan 2016.
- Moran, M. J. (n.d.-b). Term two – Talking, drawing, writing: The why and how. The Multiliteracy project. http://www.multiliteracies.ca/index.php/folio/viewDocument/110/9915. Accessed 6 Jan 2016.
- Moran, M. J. (n.d.-c). Term two – Talking, drawing, writing: The process. The Multiliteracy Project. http://www.multiliteracies.ca/index.php/folio/viewDocument/110/11471. Accessed 6 Jan 2016.
- Moran, M. J. (n.d.-d). Term two – Talking, drawing, writing: Preparation for presentations. The Multiliteracy Project. http://www.multiliteracies.ca/index.php/folio/viewDocument/110/11473. Accessed 6 Jan 2016.
- Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
- van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Williams, G. (in press). Reflection literacy in the first years of schooling: Questions of theory and practice. In W. Bowcher & J. Liang (Eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar