Abstract
One of Halliday’s original purposes in developing Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) was to address and redress equity questions such as how and why certain groups of people are discriminated against because of their language use. This chapter provides an overview of SFL theory and why and how it has been used in recent years in the United States and elsewhere to support the academic, linguistic and cultural repertoires of multilingual and multicultural students and teachers. It further outlines key concepts drawn on by the mostly U.S. contributors throughout this volume, highlighting the similarities and differences of contributors’ approaches to critical SFL. Finally, it provides an overview of each of the three sections in the volume: (1) Reflection Literacy and Critical Language Awareness; (2) Register Variation and Equity; and (3) Multimodal Designing as they relate to SFL.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Informed by Garcia et al. (2008) we use the term emergent bilinguals (EBs) to highlight how students acquiring English through school or other social contexts are in the process of becoming bilingual, a fact that is eliminated by use of deficit terms such as English learners.
- 2.
Multilingual learner is a term used in this book to include a range of populations: heritage learners, second language learners, code switchers among various dialects etc.
References
Achugar, M., & Carpenter, B. D. (2012). Developing disciplinary literacy in a multilingual history classroom. Linguistics and Education, 23(3), 262–276.
Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M. O., & Oteiza, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 8–24.
Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Park, J., Amabisca, A., & Boscardin, C. (2008). Developing teacher capacity for serving ELLs’ writing instructional needs: A case for systemic functional linguistics. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1/2), 295–323.
Ajayi, L. (2011). Video “reading” and multimodality: A study of ESL/literacy Pupils’ interpretation of “Cinderella” from their socio-historical perspective. Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 44(1), 60–89.
Allexsaht-Snider, M., Buxton, C., & Harman, R. (2013). Research and praxis on challenging anti-immigration discourses in school and community contexts. Norteamérica, 8(2), 191–217.
Avalos, M. A., Medina, E., & Secada, W. (2015). Planning for instruction: Increasing multilingual learners’ access to algebraic word problems and visual graphics. In A. Bright, H. Hansen-Thomas, & L. C. de Oliveira (Eds.), The common core state standards in mathematics and English language learners: High school (pp. 5–28). Alexandria: TESOL Press.
Brisk, M. (2012). Young bilingual writers’ control of grammatical person in different genres. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 445–468.
Brisk, M. (2014). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre-based pedagogy for k-5 classrooms. New York: Routledge.
Brisk, M., & DeRosa, M. (2014). Young writers’ attempts at making meaning through complex sentence structures while writing a variety of genres. In L. De Oliveira & J. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in classrooms and contexts (pp. 8–24). Sheffield: Equinox.
Brisk, M., & Zisselberger, M. (2011). We’ve let them in on a secret: Using SFL theory to improve the teaching of writing to bilingual learners. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners (pp. 111–126). Mahwah: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
Butler, C. (1985). Systemic linguistics: Theory and applications. London: Batsford.
Byrnes, H. (2006). Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum.
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Code meshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 3, 401–417.
Christie, F. (2007). Ongoing dialogue: Functional linguistic and Bernsteinian sociological perspectives on education. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy (pp. 3–13). London: Continuum.
Christie, F., & Unsworth, L. (2000). Developing socially responsible language research. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities (pp. 1–26). London/Washington, DC: Cassell.
Colombi, M. C. (2009). A systemic functional approach to teaching Spanish for heritage speakers in the United States. Linguistics and Education, 20, 39–49.
Crandall, J. A., Jaramillo, A., Olsen, L., & Peyton, J. K. (2001). Diverse teaching strategies for immigrant children. In R. W. Cole (Ed.), More strategies for educating everybody’s children (pp. 33–71). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Daniello, F. (2014). Elementary grade teachers using systemic functional linguistics to inform genre-based writing instruction. In L. De Oliveira & J. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in classrooms and contexts. Sheffield: Equinox.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
de Oliveira, L. C. (2011). Knowing and writing school history: The language of students’ expository writing and teachers’ expectations. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
de Oliveira, L., & Schleppegrell, M. (2015). Focus on grammar and meaning. Oxford University Press.
Djonov, E. N. (2007). Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design: A systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis perspective. Information Design Journal, 15(2), 144–162.
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.
Fang, Z. (2012). Language correlates of disciplinary literacy. Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 19–34.
Fang, Z. (2013). Learning to teach against the institutional grain: A professional development model for teacher empowerment. In X. Zhu & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Preparing teachers for the 21st century (pp. 237–250). London: Springer.
Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Fenwick, L., Humphrey, S., Quinn, M., & Endicott, M. (2014). Developing deep understanding about language in undergraduate pre-service teacher education programs. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 1–39.
Firth, R. (Ed.). (1957). Man and culture: An evaluation of the work of Bronislav Malinowski. London: Routledge.
Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingualism and translanguaging. In Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Garcia, K., & Falchi (2008) From English language learners to emergent bilinguals. Equity matters: Research Review No. 1. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Gebhard, M., Harman, R., & Seger, W. (2007). Unpacking academic literacy for ELLs in the context of high-stakes school reform: The potential of systemic functional linguistics. Language Arts, 85(5), 419–430.
Gebhard, M., Willett, J., Jimenez, J., & Piedra, A. (2011). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers’ professional development, and ELLs’ academic literacy practices. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners (pp. 91–110). Mahwah: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
Gebhard, M., Chen, I., Graham, H., & Gunawan, W. (2013). Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 107–124.
Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 339–376). London: Longman.
Halliday, M. (2002). On grammar and grammatics. In J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar: Volume 1: The collected works of M.A.K. Halliday (pp. 384–417). London: Continuum.
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotician perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M., & Matthiesen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M., Mcintosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longmans.
Hamann, E., & Harklau, L. (2010). Education in the new Latino diaspora. In E. Murillo (Ed.), Handbook of Latinos and education: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 157–169). New York: Routledge.
Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 125–140.
Harman, R. & Khote, N. (2017). Critical SFL Praxis with bilingual youth: Disciplinary instruction in a third space. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 2, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1318663
Harman, R., & Simmons, A. (2014). Critical systemic functional linguistics and literary narratives in subject English: Promoting language awareness and social action among K-12 students. In L. C. de Oliveira & J. G. Iddings (Eds.), Genre studies and language in education (pp. 75–91). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Hasan, R. (1996). Literacy, everyday talk and society. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 377–424). Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
Hasan, R. (2011). Language and education: Learning and teaching in society. London: Equinox.
Humphrey, S. (2010). Modelling social affiliation and genre in the civic domain. In A. Mahboob & N. Knight (Eds.), Appliable linguistics (pp. 76–91). London: Continuum.
Humphrey, S., Martin, J., Dreyfus, S., & Mahboob, A. (2010). A 3×3 toolkit for academic writing. In A. Mahboob & N. Knight (Eds.), Directions in appliable linguistics. London: Continuum.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania Press.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.
Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Introduction. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 1–18). New York: Lang.
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing multimodality. London/New York: Routledge.
Kanno, Y., & Harklau, L. (Eds.). (2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence. New York: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.
Lam, W. S. E., & Warriner, D. S. (2012). Transnationalism and literacy: Investigating the mobility of people, languages, texts, and practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 191–215.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2013). Teacher professional development to improve science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Theory into Practice, 52(2), 110–117.
Lukin, A., Moore, A. R., Herke, M., Wegener, R., & Wu, C. (2011). Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4, 187–213.
Macken-Horarik, M. (1996). Literacy and learning across the curriculum: Towards a model of register from secondary school teachers. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 232–278). London: Longman.
Macken-Horarik, M., Love, K., & Unsworth, L. (2011). A grammatics ‘good enough’ for school English in the 21st century: Four challenges in realizing the potential. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34, 9–23.
Martin, J. (2014). Evolving systemic functional linguistics: Beyond the clause. Functional Linguistics, 1(3), 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-419X-1-3.
Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2005). Designing literacy pedagogy: Scaffolding asymmetries. In R. Hasan, C. Matthiesen, & J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language (pp. 251–280). London: Equinox.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Oakville: Equinox Publishing.
Martin, J., Christie, F., & Rothery, J. (1987) Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others) In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates, (pp. 58–82). Center for studies in literary education: Deakin University Press.
Matthiesen, C. (in press). Multilingual studies in systemic functional linguistics. In A. Baklouti (Ed.), Perspectives on systemic functional linguistics. New York: Routledge Press.
Matthiessen, C., Kazuhiro, T., & Wu, C. (2008). Multilingual studies as a multi-dimensional space of interconnected language studies. In J. Webster (Ed.), Meaning in context (pp. 146–221). London/New York: Continuum.
Moll, L. C. (2001). The diversity of schooling: A cultural-historical approach. In M. Reyes & Halcon (Eds.), The best for our children: Critical perspectives on literacy for Latino students. New York: Teachers College Press.
Molle, D., Sato, E., Boals, T., & Hedgspeth, C. A. (Eds.). (2015). Multilingual learners and academic literacies: Sociocultural contexts of literacy development in adolescents. New York: Routledge.
Morgan, B., & Ramanathan, V. (2005). Critical literacies and language education: Global and local perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 151–169.
Myhill, D., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2011). Making meaning with grammar: A repertoire of possibilities. English in Australia, 47(2), 1–10.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–91.
O’Halloran, K. (Ed.). (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London/New York: Continuum.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2007). Mathematical and scientific forms of knowledge: A systemic functional multimodal grammatical approach. In F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy, functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 205–236). London/New York: Continuum.
O’Halloran, C. (2014). Supporting ELLs’ argumentative writing development. Written Communication, 31, 304–331.
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
Paugh, P., & Moran, M. (2013). Growing language awareness in the classroom garden. Language Arts, 90(4), 253–267.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Potts, D., & Moran, M. J. (2013). Mediating multilingual children’s language resources. Language and Education, 27(5), 451–468.
Ramirez, J. A. (2014). Genre-based principles in a content-based English as a second language classroom. In L. de Oliveira & J. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in classrooms and contexts (pp. 55–74). Sheffield: Equinox.
Ravitch, D. (2013). Why I cannot stand the common core standards. Found 27 May 2014 at URL: http://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/26/why-i-cannot-support-the-common-core-standards/
Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. South Yorkshire: Equinox.
Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1994). Spine-chilling stories: A unit of work for junior secondary English. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Rowling, J. K. (1997). Harry potter and the sorcerer’s stone. London: Bloomsbury.
Schleppegrell, M. (2002). Challenges of the science register for ESL students: Errors and meaning making. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 119–142). Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah.
Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2006). The challenges of academic language in school subjects. Retrieved Jan 2008, from http://www.umich.edu/~govrel/adoles_lit/ schleppegrell.pdf.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning: Introduction to the special issue. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 409–418.
Schleppegrell, M. (2013). The role of meta-language in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(1), 153–170.
Schleppegrell, M. (2014). Language and education: Learning and teaching in society. Ruqaiya Hasan. (Book Review) Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 10(2), 195–200.
Schleppegrell, M. J., & Colombi, M. C. (2002). Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 1–20). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schleppegrell, M., & Go, A. L. (2007). Analyzing the writing of English learners: A functional approach. Language Arts, 84(6), 529–538.
Schulze, J. (2011). Writing to persuade: A systemic functional view. GIST Educational Research and Teaching Journal, 5, 127–157.
Shin, D., & Cimasko, T. (2008). Multimodal design and second language composition: New tools, traditional norms. Computers and Composition, 25(4), 373–458.
Shin, D., Gebhard, M., & Seger, W. (2010). Weblogs and academic literacy development: Expanding audience and linguistic repertoires. In S. Rilling & M. Dantas-Whitney (Eds.), Authenticity in the classroom and beyond (pp. 99–111). Alexandria: TESOL.
Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Williams, G. (2000). Children’s literature, children and uses of language description. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities. London: Cassell.
Zygouris-Coe, V. I. (2012). Disciplinary literacy and the common core state standards. Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 35–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harman, R. (2018). Transforming Normative Discourses of Schooling: Critical Systemic Functional Linguistics Praxis. In: Harman, R. (eds) Bilingual Learners and Social Equity. Educational Linguistics, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60951-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60953-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)