Abstract
The present volume has aimed to cover a broad range of approaches to agency at work, exploring its relationship with professional learning and development. Thus, the chapters included in this book have discussed the role of agency in learning and development, considering a variety of working life contexts and applying both conceptual and empirical perspectives. This final chapter provides an overview of both the conceptual approaches and the empirical implementations. We see the perspectives as complementary. From the content of the book, we discern the phenomena as falling on two main dimensions, clustering at opposite ends of these dimensions. Thus, the following contrasts are evidenced: (a) agency understood as a personal capacity, vs. agency as behaviour, and (b) agency as an individual phenomenon, vs. agency as a collective phenomenon. All the chapters emphasise that agency is needed for learning and development. However, they differ in how they view the relationships between the concepts. They also exhibit differences in the empirical decisions taken and the research strategies chosen. In this concluding chapter, we discuss the main similarities and differences emerging from the chapters. We also highlight avenues for future research on agency and its relationship with professional learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billett, S. (2000). Guided learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 12(7), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620010353351
Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 312–324.
Billett, S. (2011). Subjectivity, self and personal agency in learning through and for work. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. O’Conner (Eds.), The international handbook of workplace learning (pp. 60–72). London: Sage.
Billett, S., & Noble, C. (2017). Individuals’ mediation of learning professional practice: Co-working and learning to prescribe. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 205–227). Cham: Springer.
Collin, K., Paloniemi, S., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Multiple forms of professional agency for (non)crafting of work practices in a hospital organization. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5(3a), 63–83.
Collin, K., Lemmetty, S., Herranen, S., Paloniemi, S., Auvinen, T., & Riivari, E. (2017). Professional agency and creativity in information technology work. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 249–270). Cham: Springer.
Damşa, C., Froehlich, D. E., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2017). Reflections on empirical and methodological accounts of agency at work. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 445–461). Cham: Springer.
Edwards, A. (2015). Recognising and realising teachers’ professional agency. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice. Special Issue 21 (6), 779-784.
Edwards, A., Montecinos, C., Cádiz, J., Jorratt, P., Manriquez, L., & Rojas, C. (2017). Working relationally on complex problems: Building capacity for joint agency in new forms of work. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 229–247). Cham: Springer.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Emerging conceptualisations on professional agency and learning. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 183–201). Cham: Springer.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2014). Identity and agency in professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practicebased learning (pp. 645–672). Dordrecht: Springer.
Evans, K. (2017). Bounded agency in professional lives. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 17–36). Cham: Springer.
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
Goller, M. (2017). Human agency at work: An active approach towards expertise development. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Goller, M., & Billett, S. (2014). Agentic behaviour at work: Crafting learning experiences. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses on professional learning: On the boundary between learning and working (pp. 25–44). Dordrecht: Springer.
Goller, M., & Harteis, C. (2017). Human agency at work: Towards a clarification and operationalisation of the concept. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 85–103). Cham: Springer.
Gustavsson, M. (2007). The potential for learning in industrial work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(7), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710819393
Haapasaari, A., & Kerosuo, H. (2015). Transformative agency: The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 37–47.
Harteis, C., & Goller, M. (2014). New skills for new jobs: Work agency as a necessary condition for successful lifelong learning. In S. Billett, T. Halttunen, & M. Koivisto (Eds.), Promoting, assessing, recognizing and certifying lifelong learning: International perspectives and practices (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
Harwood, J., & Froehlich, D. E. (2017). Proactive feedback-seeking, teaching performance, and flourishing among teachers in an international primary school. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 425–444). Cham: Springer.
Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00303.x
Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2014). Seeking new perspectives on the development of teacher education – A study of the Finnish context. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 39–52.
Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Mahlakaarto, S. (2017a). Teacher educators’ collective professional agency and identity – Transforming marginality to strength. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63(April), 36–46. http://dx.coi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.001
Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017b). The reciprocal relationship between emotions and agency in the workplace. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 161–181). Cham: Springer.
Hopwood, N. (2017). Agency, learning and knowledge work: Epistemic dilemmas in professional practices. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 121–140). Cham: Springer.
Kerosuo, H. (2017). Transformative agency and the development of knotworking in building design. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 331–349). Cham: Springer.
Kreuzer, C., Weber, S., Bley, S., & Wiethe-Körprich, M. (2017). Measuring intrapreneurship competence as a manifestation of work agency in different educational settings. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 373–399). Cham: Springer.
Kwon, H. W. (2017). Expanding the notion of agency: Introducing grit as an additional facet of agency. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 105–120). Cham: Springer.
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2017). Proactive employees: The relationship between work-related reflection and innovative work behaviour. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 141–159). Cham: Springer.
Palesy, D., & Billett, S. (2017). Learning occupational practice in the absence of expert guidance: The agentic action of Australian home care workers. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 271–289). Cham: Springer.
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017). Teacher agency and professional learning communities: What can leaning rounds in Scotland teach us? Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 318–333.
Raemdonck, I., Thijssen, J., & de Greef, M. (2017). Self-directedness in work-related learning processes. Theoretical perspectives and development of a measurement instrument. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 401–423). Cham: Springer.
Rajala, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2017). Researching teachers’ agentic orientations to educational change in Finnish schools. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 311–329). Cham: Springer.
Smith, R. (2012). Clarifying the subject centred approach to vocational learning theory: Negotiated participation. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(2), 159–174.
Smith, R. (2017). Three aspects of epistemological agency: The socio-personal construction of work-learning. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 67–84). Cham: Springer.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior and organisational citizenship behavior: Are they opposite forms of active behavior?. Applied Psychology, 59(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00414.x
Toom, A. & Pyhältö, K. & Rust, F. (2015). Guest editorial. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice. Special Issue 21(6), 615–623.
Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2013). Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Applied Psychology, 62(1), 44–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00514.x
Tynjälä, P. (2013). Toward a 3-P model of workplace learning: A literature review. Vocations and Learning, 6(1), 11–36.
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017a). An agency-promoting learning arena for developing shared work practices. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 351–371). Cham: Springer.
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P. & Eteläpelto, A. (2017b). Agentic perspective on fostering work-related learning. Studies in Continuing Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2017.1310097
Vähäsantanen, K., Räikkönen, E., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P. & Eteläpelto, A. (2017c). Developing an instrument to measure the multidimensional structure of professional agency. Journal of Education and Work. (submitted Spring 2017)
Wiethe-Körprich, M., Weber, S., Bley, S., & Kreuzer, C. (2017). Intrapreneurship competence as a manifestation of work agency: A systematic literature review. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 37–65). Cham: Springer.
Ylén, M. (2017). Professional virtues and agency at work: An ethnography of software developers. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 291–310). Cham: Springer.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland [Grant number 288925, The Role of Emotions in Agentic Learning at Work]. We want to express our warmest thanks to Donald Adamson for proofreading the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paloniemi, S., Goller, M. (2017). The Multifaceted Nature of Agency and Professional Learning. In: Goller, M., Paloniemi, S. (eds) Agency at Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60942-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60943-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)