Abstract
This chapter contributes to the discussion on meaningful work by examining professional virtues and agency in the context of software development work. The study referenced in this chapter provides an example of an ethnographic, practice-based research setting. While asking, ‘How do organisational practices enable professional agency?’ the questions, ‘What agency-enabling practices are in the organisation?’ and ‘What kind of professional virtues do these practices enable?’ are discussed. As a result, four practices that enable professional agency were identified: democracy, experimentation, self-directed development and independent project teams. The focus on the moral dimension of work challenges us to think about professional agency in relation to the virtues of a professional practice: This chapter emphasizes that the pursuit of meaningful work is not solely about the asset of universal best practices but also about the virtues important to a particular group of professionals in a particular organisation. As the organisation studied was an award-winning workplace recognized for employee well-being and satisfaction, the findings of this study suggest that one element of a great place to work is the fact that the organisation’s practices provide space for a virtue-driven professional agency, and that these organisational practices have formed with respect to professional virtues. To create a great workplace, organisations should see themselves as spaces for professional agency, enabling such work conditions that it is possible for professionals’ virtues to guide their work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65(3), 367–390.
Barley, S., & Kunda, G. (2011). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1), 76–95.
Beadle, R., & Moore, G. (2011). MacIntyre, Neo-Aristotelianism and organization theory. Philosophy and Organization Theory Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 32, 85–121.
Billet, S. (2006). Work, subjectivity and learning. In S. Billet, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning. Understanding learning through working life (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Springer.
Chia, R. (2003). Organization theory as a postmodern science. In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Eds.), The oxford handbook of organization theory. Meta-theoretical perspectives (pp. 113–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collin, K., Lemmetty, S., Herranen, S., Paloniemi, S., Auvinen, T. & Riivari, E. (2017). Professional agency and creativity in information technology work. In M. Gollerm, & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development. (pp. 249–270). Cham: Springer.
Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283.
Covaleski, M., Dirsmith, M., Heian, J., & Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in big six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 293–327.
Cunliffe, A. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426.
Czarniawska, B. (2008). A theory of organizing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd..
Damarin, A. (2006). Rethinking occupational structure: The case of web site production work. Work and Occupations, 33(4), 429–463.
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9–10), 833–859.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (2010). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. London: Sage.
Eriksson, P., Henttonen, E., & Meriläinen, S. (2008). Managerial work and gender—Ethnography of cooperative relationships in small software companies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(4), 354–363.
Eteläpelto, A., Heiskanen, T., & Collin, K. (2011a). Mahdollisuudet, tilat ja toisin toimimisen paikat työssä ja koulutuksessa [Opportunities, spaces and places for doing things differently in work and education]. In A. Eteläpelto, T. Heiskanen, & K. Collin (Eds.), Valta ja toimijuus aikuiskasvatuksessa [Power and agency in adult education] (pp. 355–365). Helsinki: Kansanvalistusseura.
Eteläpelto, A., Heiskanen, T., & Collin, K. (2011b). Vallan ja toimijuuden monisäikeisyys [The complexity of power and agency]. In A. Eteläpelto, T. Heiskanen, & K. Collin (Eds.), Valta ja toimijuus aikuiskasvatuksessa [Power and agency in adult education] (pp. 9–30). Helsinki: Kansanvalistusseura.
Eteläpelto, A., Heiskanen, T., & Collin, K. (Eds.). (2011c). Valta ja toimijuus aikuiskasvatuksessa [Power and agency in adult education]. Helsinki: Kansanvalistusseura.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.
Feldman, M., & Orlikowski, W. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.
Fleming, P. (2013). ‘Down with big brother!’ The end of ‘corporate culturalism’? Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 474–495.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2006). Contesting the corporation: Struggle, power and resistance in organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fletcher, D., & Watson, T. (2007). Voice, silence and the business of construction: Loud and quiet voices in the construction of personal, organizational and social realities. Organization, 14(2), 155–174.
Gherardi, S. (2009). Practice? It’s a matter of taste! Management Learning, 40(5), 535–550.
Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology (5th ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goller, M., & Harteis, C. (2017). Human agency at work: Towards a clarification and an operationalisation of the concept. In M. Goller, & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development. (pp. 85–103). Cham: Springer.
Green, B. (2009). Introduction: Understanding and researching professional practice. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Grey, C. (2005). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying organizations. London: Sage.
Henttonen, E., & LaPointe, K. (2015). Työelämän toisinajattelijat [Dissidents of working life]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Himanen, P. (2001). The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. Helsinki: WSOY.
Hökkä, P., Paloniemi, S., Vähäsantanen, K., Herranen, S., Manninen, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (Eds.) (2014). Ammatillisen toimijuuden ja työssä oppimisen vahvistaminen – Luovia voimavaroja työhön! [Promoting professional agency and learning at work – Creative resources for work!] University of Jyväskylä.
Humphreys, M., & Watson, T. (2009). Ethnographic practices: From ‘Writing-up ethnograpic research’ to ‘Writing ethnography’. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels, & F. Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational ethnography. Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp. 40–55). London: Sage.
Iivari, J., & Iivari, N. (2011). The relationship between organisational culture and the deployment of agile methods. Information and Software Technology, 53, 509–520.
Järvensivu, A. (2010). Tapaus työelämä, ja voiko sitä muuttaa? [The case for working life, and how to change it?]. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Kemmis, S. (2009). Understanding professional practice: A synoptic framework. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kemmis, S. (2010). What is professional practice? Recognizing and respecting diversity in understandings of practice. In C. Kanes (Ed.), Elaborating professionalism: Studies in practice and theory (pp. 139–166). New York: Springer.
Kerosuo, H. (2017). Transformative agency and the development of knotworking in building design. In M. Goller, & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development. (pp. 331–349). Cham: Springer.
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture. Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Kylliäinen, A. (2012). Paksunahkaisuudesta suurisieluisuuteen. Hyveet työssä ja elämässä [From thick-skinness to magnanimity. Virtues in work and life]. Helsinki: Otava.
LaPointe, K., & Tienari, J. (2013). HR, identiteettityö ja ammatillinen eetos [HR, Identity work and professional ethos]. Työn tuuli, 2(2013), 7–18.
Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating between ‘Meaningful work’ and the ‘Management of meaning’. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 491–511.
MacIntyre, A. (1987). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.
Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2010). Re-turn to practice: An introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309–1327.
Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and zooming out: A package of method and theory to study work practices. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels, & F. Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational ethnography. Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp. 120–138). London: SAGE.
Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Introduction: Toward a practice-based view of knowing and learning in organizations. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 3–31). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
O’Riain, S. (2010). The missing customer and the ever-present market: Software developers and the service economy. Work and Occupations, 37(3), 320–348.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 23–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Räsänen, K., & Trux, M.-L. (2012). Työkirja. Ammattilaisen paluu [Workbook. Return of the professional]. Helsinki: Kansanvalistusseura.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2010). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23–44.
Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). New York: Routledge.
Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560.
Swidler, A. (2001). What anchors cultural practices. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 83–101). New York: Routledge.
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P. & Eteläpelto, A. (2017). An agency-promoting learning arena for developing shared work practices. In M. Goller, & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development. (pp. 351–371). Cham: Springer.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Van Maanen, J. (1995). An end to innocence: The ethnography of ethnography. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Representation in ethnography (pp. 1–35). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Van Maanen, J. (2002). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 101–118). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Van Maanen, J. (2006). Ethnography then and now. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 1(1), 13–21.
Watson, T. (2000). Making sense of managerial work and organizational research processes with caroline and terry. Organization, 7(3), 489–510.
Ylén, M. (2015). Labor, Amor, Vincit. Ohjelmistotalon käytännöt ammatillisen toimijuuden tilana [Labor, Amor, Vincit. Practices of a software house as a space for professional agency]. Master’s thesis, Management studies. Aalto University School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/15488
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ylén, M. (2017). Professional Virtues and Agency at Work: An Ethnography of Software Developers. In: Goller, M., Paloniemi, S. (eds) Agency at Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60942-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60943-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)