Skip to main content

Application of Graph Theory to Analysing Student Success Through Development of Progression Maps

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Education for a Smart Society (GEDC 2016, WEEF 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 627))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Student progression is influenced by a number of factors including the pre- and co-requisite structures. Simply viewing pass/fail rates of individual courses is not sufficient to understand an academic programmes progression profile. In this study, the emphasis was on identifying the major obstacles to progression towards graduation.

The approach involved generating progression tree structures that revealed the routes by which students pass through the curriculum. Identifying these routes allows for their support to be implemented in practical ways, e.g. by alternative timetabling so that frequently occurring progression routes would experience fewer scheduling clashes.

It was discovered that an large number of progression paths exist even in a structured degree programmes. Further tree analysis was therefore required. The primary approach was to observe the students on the minimum-time-to-graduate route and to determine which events (which courses) caused students to fail out of the minimum time route. The approach was therefore to determine which courses caused the (remaining) minimum time students fail onto longer graduation routes. This result was further distilled to the top five areas obstructing graduation.

The methods were applied to an undergraduate Chemical Engineering programme. The system identified three courses in the second year second semester of the programme, with one course in particular, ENCH2TD, causing 45% of all minimum time students in that semester to fail out onto a route requiring an extra year of study. The method therefore consistently identified major obstacles to progression in an academic programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Clements, D.H.: Curriculum Research: towards a framework for ‘research-based’ curricula. J. Res. Math. Educ. 38(1), 35–79 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.: The role of learning progressions in competency-based pathways. A report by the Achieve organisation, United States of America (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatthorn, A.A., Carr, J.F., Harris, D.E.: Planning and organising for curriculum renewal. In: ASCD Curriculum Handbook, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, N.: Mapping learning outcomes: what you map is what you see. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, X., Wah, B.W., Cheng, X., Wang, Y.: Significance and challenges of Big Data research. Big Data Res. 2(2), 59–64 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, J., Plomp, T.: A relational approach to curriculum design. J. Curriculum Stud. 31(6), 679–709 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabiyev, V.V., Cakiroglu, U., Karal, H., Erumut, A.E., Cebi, A.: Application of graph theory in an intelligent tutoring system for solving mathematical world problems. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 12(4), 689–703 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel-Levitz: Noel-Levitz Retention Codifications, Student Success, Retention, and Graduation: Definitions, Theories, Practices, Patterns, and Trends, November 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinas, I.: Learning progressions in science education: two approaches for development. In: Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, E., Nagle, K., Cameto, R., Sheinker, A., Lehr, D., Harayama, N., Cook, H.G., Whetstone, P.: Understanding Learning Progressions and Learning Maps to Inform the Development of Assessment for Students in Special Populations. Colloqium on Learning Models, Washington, D.C. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, J., Darby, D.: Educational Research: A Critique. Office for Standards in Education, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes hereby to acknowledge the Modern Scholarship project through which the Autoscholar Advisor is implemented and maintained:

http://modernscholarship.org.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randhir Rawatlal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rawatlal, R. (2018). Application of Graph Theory to Analysing Student Success Through Development of Progression Maps. In: Auer, M., Kim, KS. (eds) Engineering Education for a Smart Society. GEDC WEEF 2016 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 627. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60937-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60937-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60936-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60937-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics