Advertisement

Virtual Out-of-Body Experience as a Potential Therapeutic Tool After Kidney Transplantation

  • Péter CsibriEmail author
  • Róbert Pantea
  • Attila Tanács
  • Alexandra Kiss
  • Gyula Sáry
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10325)

Abstract

The last wave of commercially available virtual reality (VR) devices opened ways to more immersive medical applications. We present a virtual reality system that exploits the virtual out-of-body experience to assist the acknowledgment of the transplanted body organ. We give an overview of the physiological background and set goals towards the VR system. An implementation using Oculus Rift hardware is presented. We describe the applied physiological evaluation process for kidney transplantation. The studies are currently still ongoing.

Keywords

Medical VR Virtual out-of-body experience Transplant adoption 

References

  1. 1.
    Paolis, L.T., Ricciardi, F., Giuliani, F.: Development of a serious game for laparoscopic suture training. In: De Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2014. LNCS, vol. 8853, pp. 90–102. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-13969-2_7 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laver, K.E., George, S., Thomas, S., Deutsch, J.E., Crotty, M.: Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2), Art. No. CD008349 (2015). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub3
  3. 3.
    Gobron, S.C., Zannini, N., Wenk, N., Schmitt, C., Charrotton, Y., Fauquex, A., Lauria, M., Degache, F., Frischknecht, R.: Serious games for rehabilitation using head-mounted display and haptic devices. In: Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9254, pp. 199–219. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22888-4_15 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seymour, N.E., Gallagher, A.G., Roman, S.A., OBrien, M.K., Bansal, V.K., Andersen, D.K., Satava, R.M.: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann. Surg. 236(4), 458–464 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henderson, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., Levin, M.: Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 14(2), 52–61 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunn, J., Yeo, E., Moghaddampour, P., Chau, B., Humbert, S.: Virtual and augmented reality in the treatment of phantom limb pain: a literature review. NeuroRehabilitation Preprint, 1–7 (2016). doi: 10.3233/NRE-171447. [Preprint]
  7. 7.
    Bourdin, P., Barberia, I., Oliva, R., Slater, M.: A virtual out-of-body experience reduces fear of death. PLOS ONE 12(1), 1–19 (2017). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169343. e0169343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foerster, R.M., Poth, C.H., Behler, C., Botsch, M., Schneider, W.X.: Using the virtual reality device Oculus Rift for neuropsychological assessment of visual processing capabilities. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016). doi: 10.1038/srep37016. 37016
  9. 9.
    Abram, H.S., Buchanan, D.C.: The Gift of Life: a review of the psychological aspects of kidney transplantation. IJPM 7(2), 153–164 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baines, L.S., Joseph, J.T., Jindal, R.M.: Emotional issues after kidney transplantation: a prospective psychotherapeutic study. Clin. Transplant. 16, 455–460 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., et al.: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 4, 561–571 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blanke, O., Metzinger, T.: Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 7–13 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blanke, O., Landis, T., Spinelli, L., Seeck, M.: Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. Brain 127, 243–258 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Botvinick, M., Cohen, J.: Rubber hands touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 756 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brugger, P.: Reflective mirrors: perspective-taking in autoscopic phenomena. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 7, 179–194 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burloux, G., Bachmann, D.: Psychology and hand transplantation: clinical experiences. In: Mac Lachlan, M., Gallagher, P. (eds.) Enabling Technologies: Body Image and Body Function, pp. 169–185. Churchill Livingston, Edingburgh (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Corruble, E., Barry, C., Varescon, I., et al.: The transplanted organ questionnaire: a validation study. J. Psychosom. Res. 73, 319–324 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ehrsson, H.H., Spence, C., Passingham, R.E.: Thats my hand! activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305, 875–877 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fogassi, L., et al.: Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). J. Neurophysiol. 76, 141–157 (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fukunishi, I.: Psychosomatic problems surrounding kidney transplantation. Psychother. Psychosom. 57, 42–49 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Graziano, M.S., Cooke, D.F., Taylor, C.S.: Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 290, 1782–1786 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ionta, S., et al.: Multisensory mechanisms in temporo-parietal cortex support self-location and first-person perspective. Neuron 70, 363–374 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., Iwamura, Y.: Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7, 2325–2330 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Látos, M., Devecsery, Á., Lázár, G., Horváth, Z., Szederkényi, E., Szenohradszky, P., Csabai, M.: The role of body image integrity and posttraumatic growth in kidney transplantation: a 3-year longitudinal study. Health Psychol. Open 2(1), 1–8 (2015). doi: 10.1177/2055102915581214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., Blanke, O.: Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317, 1096–1099 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Makin, T.R., Holmes, N.P., Ehrsson, H.H.: On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behav. Brain Res. 191, 1–10 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maravita, A., Iriki, A.: Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 79–86 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schlitt, H.J., Brunkhorst, R., Schmidt, H.H.J., et al.: Attitudes of patients before and after transplantation towards various allografts. Transplant. 68, 510–514 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H.H., Sanchez-Vives, M.V.: Towards a digital body: the virtual arm illusion. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2, 6 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P.: The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 80–91 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kammers, M.P., de Vignemont, F., Verhagen, L., Dijkerman, H.C.: The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47, 204–211 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lo, W.T., So, R.H.: Cybersickness in the presence of scene rotational movements along different axes. Appl. Ergon. 32(1), 1–14 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Blanke, O.: Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 556–571 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nrn3292 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., et al.: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 4, 561–571 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tedeschi, R., Calhoun, L.: The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J. Trauma. Stress 9, 455–471 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Péter Csibri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Róbert Pantea
    • 2
  • Attila Tanács
    • 2
  • Alexandra Kiss
    • 1
  • Gyula Sáry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  2. 2.Institute of InformaticsUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations