Abstract
The nipple-areolar complex is evaluated as a separate region of the breast, and optimal clinical and diagnostic techniques are needed for best evaluation of the region because of the complicated anatomy and superficial location. In this chapter, we will discuss various diseases of nipple-areolar complex lesions, including Montgomery tubercles, nipple inversion, benign calcifications, inflammation, duct dilatations, intraductal papilloma, fibroadenomas, neurofibromatosis, dermatoses of the nipple, and breast malignancy. A comprehensive understanding of the anatomic variant and benign and malignant processes and the imaging features of each lesion are essential for accurate differentiation and diagnosis.
References
Kopans DB. Anatomy, histology, physiology, and pathology. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 3–27.
Nicholson BT, Harvey JA, Cohen MA. Nipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processes. Radiographics. 2009;29(2):509–23.
Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML, Gerson D, Poppiti R Jr, Esserman LE. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics. 2007;27(Suppl 1):S65–77.
Kopans DB. Breast anatomy and basic histology, physiology, and pathology. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 7–43.
Kalbhen CL, Kezdi-Rogus PC, Dowling MP, Flisak ME. Mammography in the evaluation of nipple inversion. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(1):117–21.
Kopans DB. Interpreting the mammogram. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 365–479.
Kim HS, Cha ES, Kim HH, Yoo JY. Spectrum of sonographic findings in superficial breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(5):663–80.
Kopans DB. Breast ultrasound. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 555–605.
Huynh PT, Parellada JA, de Paredes ES, Harvey J, Smith D, Holley L, Maxin M. Dilated duct pattern at mammography. Radiology. 1997;204(1):137–41.
Cilotti A, Bagnolesi P, Napoli V, Lencioni R, Bartolozzi C. Solitary intraductal papilloma of the breast. An echographic study of 12 cases. Radiol Med. 1991;82(5):617–20.
Ganesan S, Karthik G, Joshi M, Damodaran V. Ultrasound spectrum in intraductal papillary neoplasms of breast. Br J Radiol. 2006;79(946):843–9.
Boonjunwetwat D, Prathombutr A. Imaging of benign papillary neoplasm of the breast: mammographic, galactographic and sonographic findings. J Med Assoc Thail. 2000;83(8):832–8.
Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, Goldberg BB. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonomammography correlated with pathology in 122 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(2):369–75.
Harper AP, Kelly-Fry E, Noe JS, Bies JR, Jackson VP. Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology. 1983;146(3):731–6.
Jackson VP, Rothschild PA, Kreipke DL, Mail JT, Holden RW. The spectrum of sonographic findings of fibroadenoma of the breast. Investig Radiol. 1986;21(1):34–40.
Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP. Benign processes-tumors. In: Tohno E, editor. Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases. 1st ed. Edinburgh; New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 76–91.
Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology. 1989;172(3):671–5.
Adler DD. Ultrasound of benign breast conditions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1989;10(2):106–18.
Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Rubin CM, Butcher C, Royle GT, Theaker J. Ultrasonic attenuation in fibroadenoma of the breast. Clin Radiol. 1992;45(3):175–8.
Murat A, Kansiz F, Kabakus N, Kazez A, Ozercan R. Neurofibroma of the breast in a boy with neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin Imaging. 2004;28(6):415–7.
Gokalp G, Hakyemez B, Kizilkaya E, Haholu A. Myxoidneurofibromas of the breast: mammographical, sonographical and MRI appearances. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(958):e234–7.
Reynolds DL Jr, Jacobson JA, Inampudi P, et al. Sonographic characteristics of peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):741–4.
Lin J, Martel W. Cross-sectional imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: characteristic signs on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(1):75–82.
Cordoliani F, Rybojad M, Verola O, Espié M. Dermatoses of the nipple and the areola. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol. 1995;43(1–2):82–7.
Parlakgumus A, Yildirim S, Bolat FA, Caliskan K, Ezer A, Colakoglu T, Moray G. Dermatoses of the nipple. Can J Surg. 2009;52(2):160–1.
Iancu D, Nochomovitz LE. Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: presentation as a mass in the female nipple. Breast J. 2001;7(4):263–5.
Amamo G, Yajima M, Moroboshi Y, Kuriya Y, Ohuchi N. MRI accurately depicts underlying DCIS in a patient with Paget’s disease of the breast without palpable mass and mammography findings. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35:149–53.
Lloyd J, Flanagan AM. Mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:742–9.
Capobianco G, Spaliviero B, Dessole S, Cherchi PL, Marras V, Ambrosini G, Meloni F, Meloni GB. Paget’s disease of the nipple diagnosed by MRI. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274:316–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, K.S. (2018). The Nipple-Areolar Complex: A Pictorial Review of Common and Uncommon Conditions. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60925-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60925-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60924-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60925-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)