Skip to main content

The Nipple-Areolar Complex: A Pictorial Review of Common and Uncommon Conditions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction

Abstract

The nipple-areolar complex is evaluated as a separate region of the breast, and optimal clinical and diagnostic techniques are needed for best evaluation of the region because of the complicated anatomy and superficial location. In this chapter, we will discuss various diseases of nipple-areolar complex lesions, including Montgomery tubercles, nipple inversion, benign calcifications, inflammation, duct dilatations, intraductal papilloma, fibroadenomas, neurofibromatosis, dermatoses of the nipple, and breast malignancy. A comprehensive understanding of the anatomic variant and benign and malignant processes and the imaging features of each lesion are essential for accurate differentiation and diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kopans DB. Anatomy, histology, physiology, and pathology. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholson BT, Harvey JA, Cohen MA. Nipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processes. Radiographics. 2009;29(2):509–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML, Gerson D, Poppiti R Jr, Esserman LE. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics. 2007;27(Suppl 1):S65–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kopans DB. Breast anatomy and basic histology, physiology, and pathology. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 7–43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kalbhen CL, Kezdi-Rogus PC, Dowling MP, Flisak ME. Mammography in the evaluation of nipple inversion. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(1):117–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kopans DB. Interpreting the mammogram. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 365–479.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim HS, Cha ES, Kim HH, Yoo JY. Spectrum of sonographic findings in superficial breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(5):663–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kopans DB. Breast ultrasound. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 555–605.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huynh PT, Parellada JA, de Paredes ES, Harvey J, Smith D, Holley L, Maxin M. Dilated duct pattern at mammography. Radiology. 1997;204(1):137–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cilotti A, Bagnolesi P, Napoli V, Lencioni R, Bartolozzi C. Solitary intraductal papilloma of the breast. An echographic study of 12 cases. Radiol Med. 1991;82(5):617–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganesan S, Karthik G, Joshi M, Damodaran V. Ultrasound spectrum in intraductal papillary neoplasms of breast. Br J Radiol. 2006;79(946):843–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boonjunwetwat D, Prathombutr A. Imaging of benign papillary neoplasm of the breast: mammographic, galactographic and sonographic findings. J Med Assoc Thail. 2000;83(8):832–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, Goldberg BB. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonomammography correlated with pathology in 122 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(2):369–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harper AP, Kelly-Fry E, Noe JS, Bies JR, Jackson VP. Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology. 1983;146(3):731–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson VP, Rothschild PA, Kreipke DL, Mail JT, Holden RW. The spectrum of sonographic findings of fibroadenoma of the breast. Investig Radiol. 1986;21(1):34–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP. Benign processes-tumors. In: Tohno E, editor. Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases. 1st ed. Edinburgh; New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology. 1989;172(3):671–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adler DD. Ultrasound of benign breast conditions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1989;10(2):106–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Rubin CM, Butcher C, Royle GT, Theaker J. Ultrasonic attenuation in fibroadenoma of the breast. Clin Radiol. 1992;45(3):175–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murat A, Kansiz F, Kabakus N, Kazez A, Ozercan R. Neurofibroma of the breast in a boy with neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin Imaging. 2004;28(6):415–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gokalp G, Hakyemez B, Kizilkaya E, Haholu A. Myxoidneurofibromas of the breast: mammographical, sonographical and MRI appearances. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(958):e234–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds DL Jr, Jacobson JA, Inampudi P, et al. Sonographic characteristics of peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):741–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin J, Martel W. Cross-sectional imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: characteristic signs on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(1):75–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cordoliani F, Rybojad M, Verola O, Espié M. Dermatoses of the nipple and the areola. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol. 1995;43(1–2):82–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Parlakgumus A, Yildirim S, Bolat FA, Caliskan K, Ezer A, Colakoglu T, Moray G. Dermatoses of the nipple. Can J Surg. 2009;52(2):160–1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Iancu D, Nochomovitz LE. Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: presentation as a mass in the female nipple. Breast J. 2001;7(4):263–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Amamo G, Yajima M, Moroboshi Y, Kuriya Y, Ohuchi N. MRI accurately depicts underlying DCIS in a patient with Paget’s disease of the breast without palpable mass and mammography findings. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35:149–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lloyd J, Flanagan AM. Mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:742–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Capobianco G, Spaliviero B, Dessole S, Cherchi PL, Marras V, Ambrosini G, Meloni F, Meloni GB. Paget’s disease of the nipple diagnosed by MRI. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274:316–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyu Soon Kim M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, K.S. (2018). The Nipple-Areolar Complex: A Pictorial Review of Common and Uncommon Conditions. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60925-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60925-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60924-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60925-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics