Abstract
Inclusive citizen engagement in which ordinary citizens and civil society organizations participate to demand accountability, commonly referred to as social accountability, has increasingly been recognized as a key strategy in enhancing government performance and improving access to quality public services on an equitable basis. Transparent and structured engagement between citizen and state actors prepare the ground for bolstering ‘answerability,’ and allow for direct input into ways in which government performance can be improved. Inclusion within the social accountability discourse means that citizen groups on the margins of society can address the inequity in their ‘voice relationship’ with the government and public institutions responsible for service delivery. However, citizen engagement on its own is not sufficient to improve service delivery outcomes, especially for the poor; it needs to be embedded in broader state-led reform.
Countries in South Asia have made impressive strides in expanding citizens’ access to governance and basic public service infrastructure, but issues of accountability remain a serious concern. Citizens are typically subjected to a persistent lack of responsiveness, corruption and overall weak accountability in almost all instances of engagement with the government. These entrenched practices are increasingly being challenged now by citizens’ groups, civil society organizations and independent media, using a broad range of tools and mechanisms to benchmark adequacy and quality of government service obligations; and engaging constructively with officials, public service providers and policymakers to exact answerability. There is encouraging evidence that points to the contribution of these efforts towards making public decision-making more transparent and mitigating accountability challenges at least to some extent; at the same time there is still a long way to go. These accomplishments, challenges and opportunities will be deliberated upon in this chapter, drawing upon experiences from select social accountability initiatives in South Asia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Power-holders refers to those who hold political, administrative, financial or other forms of authority, control or influence; and usually include functionaries of the state, international financial institutions, large private corporations and even civil society actors.
- 2.
Union Parishads are the lowest tier of rural local government units in Bangladesh.
- 3.
Dalit refers to members of those oppressed castes who are born with the stigma of ‘untouchability’ because of the extreme impurity and pollution connected with their traditional menial occupations. Dalits were ‘outcastes’ falling outside the traditional fourfold caste system; and were physically and socially excluded and isolated from the rest of society. Dalits constitute around 17% of India’s population.
References
Grandvoinnet, H., Aslam, G., & Raha, S. (2015). Opening the Black Box: The Contextual Drivers of Social Accountability. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/21686. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Malena, C., & McNeil, M. (2010). Demanding Good Governance. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
World Bank. (2003). World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5986. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
World Bank. (2012). How, When and Why to Use Demand-Side Governance Approaches in Projects. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/13064. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahman, N. (2018). Social Accountability for Inclusive Governance: The South Asian Experience. In: Ahmed, N. (eds) Inclusive Governance in South Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60904-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60904-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60903-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60904-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)