Skip to main content

Improving the Numerical Stability of Steady-State Differential Viscoelastic Flow Solvers in OpenFOAM\(^{\textregistered }\)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover OpenFOAM®

Abstract

This work reports the developments made in improving the numerical stability of the viscoelastic solvers available in the open-source finite volume computational library \(OpenFOAM^{\textregistered }\). For this purpose, we modify the usual both-side diffusion (BSD) technique, using a new approach to discretize the explicit diffusion operator. Calculations performed with the new solver, for two benchmark 2D case studies of an upper-convected Maxwell (UCM) fluid, are presented and compared with literature results, namely the 4:1 planar contraction flow and the flow around a confined cylinder. In the 4:1 planar contraction flow, the corner vortex size predictions agree well with the literature, and a relative error below \(5.3 \%\) is obtained for \(De \le 5\). In the flow around a confined cylinder, the predictions of the drag coefficient on the cylinder are similar to reference data, with a relative error below \(0.16 \%\) for \(De \le 0.9\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. H. Versteeg and W. Malalasekra. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method Approach. Prentice Hall, London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.G. Oldroyd. On the formulation of rheological equations of state. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 200: 523–541, 1950.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J.L. White and A.B. Metzner. Development of constitutive equations for polymeric melts and solutions. J. App. Polym. Sci., 7: 1867–1889, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.L. Favero, A.R. Secchi, N.S.M. Cardozo, and H. Jasak. Viscoelastic flow analysis using the software OpenFOAM and differential constitutive equations. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 165: 1625–1636, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Habla, A. Obermeier, and O. Hinrichsen. Semi-implicit stress formulation for viscoelastic models: Application to three-dimensional contraction flows. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 199: 70–79, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Guénette and M. Fortin. A new mixed finite element method for computing viscoelastic flows. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 60: 27–52, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.V. Patankar and D.B. Spalding. A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. Int. Heat Mass Transf., 115: 1787–1803, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M.A. Alves, F.T. Pinho, and P.J. Oliveira. Effect of a high-resolution differencing scheme on finite-volume predictions of viscoelastic flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 93: 287–314, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M.A. Alves, F.T. Pinho, and P.J. Oliveira. The flow of viscoelastic fluids past a cylinder: finite-volume high-resolution methods. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 97: 207–232, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Lee, J. Zhang, and C.-C. Lu. Incomplete LU preconditioning for large scale dense complex linear systems from electromagnetic wave scattering problems. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 185: 158–175, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D.A.H. Jacobs. Preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for solving systems of algebraic equations. Technical Report RD/L/N193/80, Central Electricity Research Laboratories, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Ajiz and A. Jennings. A robust incomplete Cholesky-conjugate gradient algorithm. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 20: 949–966, 1984.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 Programme and National Funds through FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the project UID/CTM/50025/2013 and under the scholarship SFRH/BPD/100353/2014. The author M.S.B. Araujo acknowledges funding from CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) proc. BEX 1902-14-8. The authors would like to acknowledge the Minho University cluster under the project Search-ON2: Revitalization of HPC infrastructure of UMinho, (NORTE-07-0162-FEDER-000086), co-funded by the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (ON.2-0 Novo Norte), under the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF), through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Miguel Nóbrega .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernandes, C., Araujo, M.S.B., Ferrás, L.L., Miguel Nóbrega, J. (2019). Improving the Numerical Stability of Steady-State Differential Viscoelastic Flow Solvers in OpenFOAM\(^{\textregistered }\). In: Nóbrega, J., Jasak, H. (eds) OpenFOAM® . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60846-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60846-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60845-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60846-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics