Skip to main content

Ergonomic Assessment and Workplace Design in Dairy Processing Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 605))

Abstract

Ergonomics plays an important role in occupational safety, productivity and occupational diseases. For this reason, the creation of the auxiliary equipment or the machine and the work place designs to improve human life quality and working conditions is necessary at every area where manufacturing is made. Musculoskeletal System Diseases (MSDs) constitute 50% of new cases in occupational diseases. Unproper postures and ergonomic inadequacies in repetitive work activities in the formation of these diseases which may be painful during work or at rest are the main factors. Ergonomic improvements made are not only protect from occupational diseases, but also provide job satisfaction. This study has been carried out in a dairy-processing machine manufacturer where labor-intensive project-type manufacturing is conducted according to the customer orders. Human continues to be the most important element of manufacturing in this industry. So, ergonomic problems were determined by observing the all manufacturing process and suggestions were made by RULA analysis to improve existing problems by considering anthropometric data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bridger, R.S.: Introduction to Ergonomics. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stephen Pheasant, S., Haslegrave, C.M.: Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foster, Sabancı, A., Sümer, S., Say, S.: Endüstriyel Ergonomi. Nobel Akademik Yayınevi, Ankara (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Güler, Ç.: Sağlık boyutuyla Ergonomi, pp. 291–314. Palme Yayınevi, Ankara (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dul, J., Weerdmeester, B.: Ergonomi, Ne, Neden, Nasıl, Çeviren. In: Yavuz, M., Kahraman, N., Kitabevi, S. (eds.) Ankara (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Urlings, I.J.M., Nuboer, I.D., Dul, J.: A method for changing the attitudes and behaviour of management and employees to stimulate the implementation of ergonomic improvement. Ergonomics 33, 629–637 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mirka, G.A., Smith, C., Shivers, C., Taylor, J.: Ergonomic interventions for the furniture manufacturing industry: part I e lift assist devices. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 29, 263–273 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Akay, D., Dağdeviren, M., Kurt, M.: Çalışma Duruşlarının Ergonomik Analizi. J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi University 18(3), 73–84 (2003). CILT

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sutton, I.: Human Factors and Ergonomics, Plant Design and Operations, pp. 160–177 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sabancı, A., Korkut, S.S.: Ergonomi. Nobel Kitabevi, Ankara (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erkan, N.: Ergonomi. MilliProdüktiveMerkezi Yayınları, Ankara (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Babalık, F.C.: Mühendisler için Ergonomi-İşbilim. Dora Yayınları, s.377 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heskett, J., Tasarım, Kültür Kitaplığı 131, Dost Kitabevi Yayınları, s.75 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parkes, K.R., Carnell, S., Farmer, E.: Research Report on Musculoskeletal Disorder, Mental Health and Work Environment. Health and Safety Executive. University of Oxford, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yelin, E.H., Trupin, L.S., Sebesta, D.S.: Transitions in employment, morbidity and disable among persons aged 51 to 61 with musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions in U.S., 1992–1994. Arthitis Rheum. 42, 769–779 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Praemer, A., Furner, S., Rice, D.P.: Musculosketal Conditions in the United States. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schierhout, G.H., Myers, J.E., Bridger, R.S.: Musculoskeletal pain and workplace ergonomic stressors in manufacturing industry in South Africa. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 12(1–2), 3–11 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Waters, T.R.: National efforts to identify research issues related to prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 14, 7–12 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaffar, N., Abdul-Tharim, A.H., Mohd-Kamar, I.F., Lop, N.S.: A literature review of ergonomics risk factors in construction industry. Procedia Eng. 20, 89–97 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kazutaka, K.: participatory methods effective for ergonomic workplace improvement. Appl. Ergon. 37(4), 547–554 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaya, Ö.: Design of work place and ergonomics in garment enterprises. Procedia Manufact. 3, 6437–6443 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kushwaha, D.K., Kane, P.V.: Ergonomic assessment and workstation design of shipping crane cabin in steel industry Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 52, 29–39 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sutalaksana, I.Z., Widyanti, A.: Anthropometry approach in workplace redesign in Indonesian Sundanese roof tile industries. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 53, 299–305 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Özcan, E., Kesiktaş, N.: Mesleki kas iskelet hastalıklarından korunma ve ergonomi. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Dergisi 34, 6–9 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jurgens, H.W., Aune, L.A., Pieper, U.: International Data on Anthropometry, Occupational Safety and Health Studies. International Labour Office, Geneva (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Koca Özer, B.: Secular trend in body height and weight of Turkish adults. Anthropol. Sci. 116(3), 191–199 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Şaşmaz, T., Öner, S., Buğdaycı, R., Kurt, A.Ö., Öner, H., Güler, Ç.: Büro Ergonomisi. Editör Güler Ç. Sağlık Boyutuyla Ergonomi Hekim ve Mühendisler İçin. Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara, s. 345–361 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. McPhee, B.J.: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper extremities in workers engaged in light, highly repetitive ivork’. In: Osterholz, U., Karmaut, W., Hullma, B., Ritz, B. (eds.) Proceedings of Irzt Symposium Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Bonn, pp. 244–258 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Das, B., ve Sengupta, A.K.: Industrial workstation design: a systematic ergonomics approach. Appl. Ergon. 27(3), 157–163 (1996). CILT

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nevra Akbilek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akbilek, N. (2018). Ergonomic Assessment and Workplace Design in Dairy Processing Industry. In: Goossens, R. (eds) Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 605. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60828-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60828-0_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60827-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60828-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics