Advertisement

Gift Giving, Reciprocity, and Exchange

  • Vanessa M. HildebrandEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Using Marcel Mauss’s foundational concept presented in The Gift, that exchanging gifts or services is an act motivated by developing social relationships, this chapter examines attempts made by skilled birth attendants to provide maternal health care to women of rural Indonesia, the rural women’s responses to the offered care, and the social results of those interactions. This chapter argues that by examining exchange and reciprocity important characteristics are revealed about how health care is given and received in contemporary society and how this impacts the health status of individuals. The conclusion is of particular interest for health researchers—how power and inequality are enacted in the health care encounter.

References

  1. Agus, Y., Horiuchi, S., & Porter, S. (2012). Rural Indonesian women’s traditional beliefs about antenatal care. BMC Research Notes, 5, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aktipis, C. A., Lee, C., & De Aguiar, R. (2011). Risk-pooling and herd survival: An agent-based model of a Maasai gift-giving system. Human Ecology, 39(2), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andaya, E. (2009). The gift of health: Socialist medical practice and shifting material and moral economies in post-Soviet Cuba. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 23(4), 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, W. (2006). Colonial pathologies: American tropical medicine, race, and hygiene in the Philippines. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anwar, I., Sami, M., Chowdhury, M. E., Salma, U., Rahman, M., & Koblinsky, M. (2008). Inequity in maternal health-care services: Evidence from home-based skilled-birth-attendant programmes in Bangladesh. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86, 252–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkin, G., & Hildebrand, V. M. (2014). Midwife radio: The entangled trajectories of global health programming, broadcast media, and the Indonesian state. Anthroplogical Quarterly, 87(4), 1105–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basalmo, A. (1999). Public pregnancies and cultural narratives of surveillance. In A. E. Clarke & V. Olesen (Eds.), Revisioning women, health, and healing: Feminist, cultural, and technoscientific perspectives. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Battaglia, D. (1992). The body in the gift: Memory and forgetting in Sabarl mortuary exchange. American Ethnologist, 19(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhutta, Z. A., & Black, R. E. (2013). Global maternal, newborn, and child health: So near and yet so far. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(23), 2226–2235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boellsdorf, T. (2004). The emergence of political homophobia in Indonesia: Masculinity and national belonging. Ethnos, 69(4), 465–486.Google Scholar
  11. Bohannan, P. (1955). Some principles of exchange and investment among the Tiv. American Anthropologist, 57(1), 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borbieva, N. O.’. N. (2010). Troubled relations: Mobility and exchange in post-soviet Kyrgyzstan. Ethnology, 49(3), 167–184.Google Scholar
  13. Bornstein, E. (2012). Disquieting gifts: Humanitarianism in New Delhi. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of culture production. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2011). SUSENAS 2010: National socio-economic survey. Jakarta: BPS.Google Scholar
  16. Brenner, S. A. (1998). The domestication of desire: Women, wealth, and modernity in Java. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brenner, S. A. (2011). Private moralities in the public sector: Democratization, Islam, and gender in Indonesia. American Anthropologist, 113(3), 478–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brunson. (2010). Confronting maternal mortality, controlling birth in Nepal: The gendered politics of receiving biomedical care at birth. Social Science and Medicine, 71(10), 1719–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cashdan, E. A. (1985). Coping with risk: Reciprocity among the Basarwa of Northern Botswana. Man, 20(3), 454–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clarke, A. E., & Olesen, V. (1999). Revisioning women, health, and healing: Feminist, cultural, and technoscientific perspectives. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Clarke, A. E., Shim, J., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. Americal Sociological Review, 68(2), 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis-Floyd, R. (2003). Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ettore, E. (2002). Reproductive genetics, gender and the body. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Filippi, V., Ronsmans, C., Campbell, O. M. R., Graham, W. J., Mills, A., Borghi, J., Koblinsky, M., & Osrin, D. (2006). Maternal health in poor countries: The broader context and a call for action. Lancet, 368, 1535–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Finlayson, K., & Downe, S. (2013). Why do women not use antenatal services in low- and middle-income countries? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. PLoS Medicine, 10(1), e1001373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Firth, R. (1967). We, the Tikopia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Godoy, R., Reyes-Garcia, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., Olivara, R. G., Bauchet, J., Ma, Z., St. John, J., Miodowski, M., Rios, O. Z., Vadez, V., & Seyfreid, C. (2007). The role of community and individuals in the formation of social capital. Human Ecology, 35(6), 709–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 176–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregory, C. A. (2015 [1982]). Gifts and commodities. Chicago: Hau Books.Google Scholar
  30. Hahn, R. A., & Gaines, A. D. (1985). Physicians of Western medicine: Anthropological approaches to theory and practice. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  31. Hart, K. (2007). Marcel Mauss: In pursuit of the whole. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 49(2), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harvey, S. A., Ayabaca, P., Burcagu, M., Djibrina, S., Edson, W. N., Gbangbade, S., McCaw-Binns, A., & Burkhalter, B. R. (2004). Skilled birth attendant competence: An initial assessment in four countries, and implications for the safe motherhood movement. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 87, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hattori, T. (2003). The moral politics of foreign aid. Review of International Studies, 29(2), 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hildebrand, V. M. (2012). Scissors as symbols: Disputed ownership of the tools of biomedical obstetrics in rural Indonesia. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 36 (3), 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kyomuhendo, G. B. (2003). Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: Impact of women’s status, traditional beliefs and limited resources. Reproductive Health Matters, 11(21), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laidlaw, J. (2000). A free gift makes no friends. Journal of the Royal Anthroplogical Institute, 6(4), 617–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levi-Strauss, C. (1987 [1950]). Introduction to the work of Marcel Mauss (trans: Felicity, B.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maheu-Giroux, M., Filippi, V., Samadoulougou, S., Castro, M. C., Maulet, N., Meda, N., & Kirakoya-Samadoulougou, F. (2015). Prevalence of symptoms of vaginal fistula in 19 sub-Saharan Africa countries: A meta-analysis of national household survey data. The Lancet Global Health, 3, e271–e278.Google Scholar
  40. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian new Guinea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Manderson, L., & Whiteford, L. M. (2000). Introduction: Health, globalization, and the fallacy of the level playing field. In L. M. Whiteford & L. Manderson (Eds.), Global health policy, local realities: The fallacy of the level playing field. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  42. Marmot, M. (2009). Closing the health gap in a generation: The work of the commission on social determinants of health and its recommendations. Global Health Promotion, 16(S1), 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maternowska, M. C. (2006). Reproducing inequities: Poverty and the politics of population in Haiti. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mauss, M. (1925). Essai sur Le Don: Forme et Raison de l’Échange dans Les Sociétés Archaïque. Année Sociologiqe, New Series, 1, 30–186.Google Scholar
  45. Mauss, M. (1967). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Translated by Ian Cunnison with an Introduction by E. E. Evans-Pritchard. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  46. Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. Translated by W.D. Halls with an Introduction by Mary Douglas. London and New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  47. Mauss, M. (2016). The gift: Expanded edition. Selected, annotated, and translated by Jane I. Guyer. Chicago, Illinois: Hau Books.Google Scholar
  48. Mawdsley, E. (2012). The changing geographies of foreign aid and development cooperation: Contributions from gift theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(2), 256–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia. (2008). The directorate general of community health: Technical guidelines for health insurance scheme for the population in health centres and its networks, year 2008. Jakarta: Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia, The Directorate of Community Health.Google Scholar
  50. Mortiz, M. (2013). Livestock transfers, risk management, and human careers in a West African pastoral system. Human Ecology, 41, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mpembeni, R. N. M., Killewo, J. Z., Leshabari, M. T., Massawe, S. N., Jahn, A., Mushi, D., & Mwakipa, H. (2007). Use patterns of maternal health services and determinants of skilled care during delivery in Southern Tanzania: Implications for achievement of MDG-5 targets. BMC Pregnancy and Birth, 7, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nichter, M. (2008). Global health: Why cultural perceptions, social representations, and biopolitics matter. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  53. Panoff, M. (1970). Marcel Mauss’s The Gift revisited. Man, 5(1), 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parry, J. (1986). The gift, the Indian gift and the ‘Indian gift.’. Man, 21(3), 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piddocke, S. (1965). The potlatch system of the southern Kwakitul: A new perspective. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 21(3), 244–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pigg, S. L. (1997). Authority in translation: Finding knowing, naming and training ‘traditional birth attendants’ in Nepal. In R. Davis-Floyd & C. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 233–262). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pinto, S. (2008). Where there is no midwife: Birth and loss in rural India. New York: Berghan Books.Google Scholar
  58. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  59. Ronsmans, C., & Graham, W. J. (2006). Maternal mortality: Who, when, where, and why. The Lancet, 368(9542), 1189–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rothman, B. K. (1998). Genetic maps and human imaginations. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  61. Sahlins, M. D. (1965). On the sociology of primitive exchange. In M. Glockmand & F. Eggan (Eds.), The relevance of models for social anthropology, Association of social anthropology monograph (Vol. 1, 9th ed.). London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2007). The tyranny of gift: Sacrificial violence in living donor transplants. American Journal of Transplantation, 7, 507–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sedgh, G., Ashford, L. S., & Hussain, R. (2016). Unmet need for contraception in developing countries: Examining women’s reasons for not using a method. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  64. Smart, A. (1993). Gifts, bribes, and Guanxi: A reconsideration of Bourdieu’s social capital. Cultural Anthropology, 8(3), 388–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stirrat, R. L., & Henkel, H. (1997). The development gift: The problem of reciprocity in the NGO world. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Strathern, A. J. (1971). The rape of Moka: Big-men and ceremonial exchange in Mont Hagan, New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Strathern, M. (1988). The gender of the gift: Problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Strathern, A., & Stewart, P. J. (2005). Ceremonial exchange. In J. G. Carrier (Ed.), A handbook of economic anthropology. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  69. Testart, A. (2013). What is a gift? Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thaddeus, S., & Maine, D. (1994). Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Social Science and Medicine, 38(8), 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tharakan, G. C. (2007). Gift and commodity: On the nature of Muduga transaction. Anthropos, 102(2), 441–454.Google Scholar
  72. Titaley, C. R., Hunter, C. L., Dibley, M. J., & Heywood, P. (2010). Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery?: A qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10(43), 1–14.Google Scholar
  73. Titmuss, R. M. (1971). The gift relationship from human blood to social policy. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  74. Valeri, V. (2013). Marcel Mauss and the new anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 262–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van den Broek, N. R., & Graham, W. J. (2009). Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: The neglected agenda. BJOG, 116(s1), 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Viera, C., Portela, A., Miller, T., Coast, E., Leone, T., & Marston, C. (2012). Increasing the use of skilled health personnel where traditional birth attendants were providers of childbirth care: A systematic review. PloS One, 7(10), e47946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Watanabe, C. (2015). Commitments of debt: Temporality and the meanings of aid work in a Japanese NGO in Myanmar. American Anthropologist, 117(3), 468–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Weiner, A. (1992). Inalienable possessions: The paradox of keeping while giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. World Health Organization. (2004). Making pregnancy safer: The critical role of the skilled birth attendant: A joint statement by WHO, ICM, and FIGO. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations