Advertisement

Self, Normativity and Embodiment

  • Elizabeth EttorreEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

As a corporeal overlay upon which healthy and unhealthy identities are fashioned, the notion of ‘embodied self’ allows for ‘social interaction’ implying diversity and the need for ‘normativity’ as a powerful paradigm in which health and illness are often shaped as normal and ‘deviant’. How ‘the agentic self’ was formative in developing sociological constructions of the body; how Mead, Goffman and Elias aid in this development; and why the study of the body is important in sociology are explored. The concept ‘medicalized bodies’ is used in applying the body to health. Recognizing the significance of embodiment and the ubiquitous moralities of health helps to consider the significance of embodied ethics. The conclusion is that past and related conceptualizations of the body become sources for future conceptualizations.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2002). This other and other others. Economy and Society, 31(4), 558–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Allen-Collinson, J., & Owton, H. (2015). Intense embodiment: Senses of heat in women’s running and boxing. Body and Society, 21(2), 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amzat, J., & Razum, O. (2014). Medical sociology in Africa. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Annandale, E. (1998). The sociology of health & medicine: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, D. (2002). A new history of identity: A sociology of medical knowledge. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barker, K. K. (2008). Electronic support groups, patient-consumers, and medicalization: The case of contested illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49, 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayles, M. D. (1984). Reproductive ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Berg, M., & Akrich, M. (2004). Introduction – Bodies on trial: Performances and politics in medicine and biology. Body and Society, 10, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernays, S., Seeley, J., Rhodes, T., & Mupambireyi, Z. (2015). What am I ‘living’ with? Growing up with HIV in Uganda and Zimbabwe. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(2), 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bordo, S. (1993). Feminism, Foucault and the politics of the body. In C. Ramazanoglu (Ed.), Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism (pp. 179–202). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. (1971). Our bodes ourselves: A book by and for women. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction, a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bowring, F. (2003). Science, seeds and cyborgs: Biotechnology and the appropriation of life. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Brook, B. (1999). Feminist perspectives on the body. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Bunton, R., & Barrows, R. (1995). Consumption and health in the ‘epidemiological’ clinic of late modern medicine. In R. Bunton, S. Nettleton, & R. Burrows (Eds.), The sociology of health promotion (pp. 206–222). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Cambrisio, A., Young, A., & Lock, M. (2000). Introduction. In M. Lock, A. Young, & A. Combrisio (Eds.), Living and working with the new medical technologies: Intersections of inquiry (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Campbell, N., & Ettorre, E. (2011). Gendering addiction: The politics of drug treatment in a neurochemical world. Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Casper, M. J., & Moore, L. J. (2009). Missing bodies: The politics of visibility. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Castaneda, C. (2014). Developing gender: The medical treatment of transgender young people. Social Science & Medicine. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.03.
  26. Coleman, E., Bockting, W., Botzer, M., Cohen-Kettenis, P., DeCuypere, G., Feldman, J., Fraser, L., Green, J., Knudson, G., Meyer, W. J., Monstrey, S., Adler, R. K., Brown, G. R., Devor, A. H., Ehrbar, R., Ettner, R., Eyler, E., Garofalo, R., Karasic, D. H., Lev, A. I., Mayer, G., Meyer-Bahlburg, H., Hall, B. P., Pfaefflin, F., Rachlin, K., Robinson, B., Schechter, L. S., Tangpricha, V., van Trotsenburg, M., Vitale, A., Winter, S., Whittle, S., Wylie, K. R., & Zucker, K. (2011). Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. International Journal of Transgenderism, 13, 165–232. © WPATH website http://www.wpath.org/site_page.cfm?pk_association_webpage_menu=1351&pk_association_webpage=3926. Accessed 21 Mar 2014.
  27. Conrad, P., & Rondini, A. (2010). The internet and medicalization. In E. Ettorre (Ed.), Culture, bodies and the sociology of health (pp. 107–120). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  28. Crossley, N. (2005). Mapping reflexive body techniques: On body modification and maintenance. Body & Society, 11, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crossley, N. (2006). Reflexions in the flesh. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Cruz, T. M. (2014). Assessing access to care for transgender and gender nonconforming people: A consideration of diversity in combating discrimination. Social Science & Medicine, 110, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davis, K. (1995). Reshaping the female body. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, K. (2007). The making of our bodies ourselves: How feminism travels across borders. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis, K. (2009). Revisiting feminist debates on cosmetic surgery: Some reflections on suffering, agency, and embodied difference. In C. J. Heyes & M. Jones (Eds.), Cosmetic surgery. A feminist primer (pp. 35–48). Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Davis, G., & Murphy, E. L. (2014). Intersex bodies as states of exception: An empirical explanation for unnecessary surgical modification. Feminist Formations, 25(2), 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. De Sutter, P., Kir, K., Verschoor, A., & Hotimsky, A. (2002). The desire to have children and the preservation of fertility in transsexual women. The International Journal of Transgenderism, 6, 3. Website http://web.archive.org/web/20070502000918/http://www.symposion.com/ijt/ijtvo06no03_02.htm#Introduction. Accessed 21 Mar 2014.
  36. Elias, N. (1978 first published 1939). The civilising process. Volume 1: The history of manners. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Elias, N. (1991 first published 1939). In M. Schröter (Ed.), The society of individuals. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  38. Elias, N. (2006). The court society. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
  39. Elias, N. (2007). In S. Quilley (Ed.), Involvement and detachment, the collected works of Norbert Elias (Vol. 8). Dublin: University College Dublin Press/Dufour Editions.Google Scholar
  40. Ettorre, E. (2002). Reproductive genetics, gender and the body. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ettorre, E. (2005). Gender, older female bodies and medical uncertainty: Finding my feminist voice by telling my illness story. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28, 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ettorre, E. (2007). Revisioning women and drug use: Gender, power and the body. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ettorre, E. (2015). Embodied deviance, gender, and epistemologies of ignorance: Re-visioning drugs use in a neurochemical, unjust world. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(6), 794–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ettorre, E., Rothman, B. K., & Steinberg, D. (2006). Feminism confronts the genome: Introduction. New Genetics and Society, 25(2), 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Falk, P. (1994). The consuming body. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Fallon, P., Katzman, M. A., & Wooley, S. C. (1996). Feminist perspectives on eating disorders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Farmer, P. (2005). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights and the new war on the poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Feathersone, M. (1991). Consumer culture and postmodernism. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Fortun, K. (2001). Advocacy after Bhopal; environmentalism, disaster, new global orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  51. Fox, N. (1998). The promise of postmodernism for the sociology of health and medicine. In G. Scambler & P. Higgs (Eds.), Modernity, medicine and health: Medical sociology towards 2000 (pp. 29–45). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Frank, A. (1991). At the will of the body: Reflections on illness. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  53. Frank, A. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Frank, A. (2001). Can we research suffering? Qualitative Health Research, 11(3), 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Frank, A. (2004). The renewal of generosity: Illness, medicine, and how to live. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Franklin, S. (2006). The IVF stem cell interface. International Journal of Surgery, 4, 86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Fuller, S. (2007). New Frontiers in science and technology studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  58. Garland-Thomson, R. (2012). The case for conserving disability. Bioethical Inquiry, 9, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  60. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  61. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  62. Gordon, R. A. (2000). Eating disorders: Anatomy of a social epidemic. Oxford: Blackwell Publications.Google Scholar
  63. Hollin, G. J. S., & Pilnick, A. (2014). Infancy, autism, and the emergence of a socially disordered body. Social Science & Medicine. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.050.
  64. Holmes, H. B. (1992). A call to heal medicine. In H. B. Holmes & L. Purdy (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in medical ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Howson, A. (2004). The body in society: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  66. International Classification of Disease (ICD – 10). (2014). Geneva, World Health Organization. Website http://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/F01-F99/F60-F69/F64-/F64.1. Accessed 21 Mar 2014.
  67. James, A., & Hockey, J. (2007). Embodying health identities. Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (1999). Introduction. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), Bioethics an anthology (pp. 1–7). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Kingdon, C. (2009). Sociology for midwives. London: Quay Books.Google Scholar
  70. Koffman, O. (2014). Fertile bodies, immature brains?: A genealogical critique of neuroscientific claims regarding the adolescent brain and of the global fight against adolescent motherhood. Social Science & Medicine. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.
  71. Kosut, M. (2014). The artification of tattoo: Transformations within a cultural field. Cultural Sociology, 8(2), 142–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Little, M. O. (1996). Why a feminist approach to bioethics? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 6(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lorber, J., & Moore, L. J. (2007). Gendered bodies: Feminist perspectives. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  74. Lundin, S. (1997). Visions of the body. In S. Lundin & M. Ideland (Eds.), Gene technology and the public. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
  75. Lupton, D. (1994). Medicine as culture: Illness, disease and the body in western societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  76. Lupton, D. (1995). The imperative of health: Public health and the regulated body. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  77. Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lupton, D. (2014). The commodification of patient opinion: The digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(6), 856–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lyon, M. L., & Barbalet, J. M. (1994). Society’s body: Emotion and the ‘somatization’ of social theory. In T. J. Csordas (Ed.), Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and the self (pp. 48–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Mahowald, M. B. (1994). Reproductive genetics and gender justice. In K. Rothenberg & E. J. Thomson (Eds.), Women and prenatal testing: Facing the challenges of genetic testing. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Maller, C. J. (2015). Understanding health through social practices: Performance and materiality in everyday life. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(1), 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mamo, L. (2007). Queering reproduction: Achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Manning, E. (2014). Wondering the world directly – Or, how movement outruns the subject. Body and Society, 20(3&4), 162–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Martin, E. (1992). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  85. Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. McDermott, E., & Roen, K. (2016). Queer youth, suicide and self-harm: Troubled subjects, troubling norms. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  88. Metzl, J. M., & Kirkland, A. (Eds.). (2010). Against health: How health became the new morality: Biopolitics, medicine, technoscience, and health in the 21st century. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Moore, L. J., & Casper, M. J. (2015). The body: Social and cultural dissections. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. Morrow, R. A. (2009). Norbert Elias and figurational sociology: The comeback of the century. Contemporary Sociology, 38(3), 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Murphy, T. F. (2012). The ethics of fertility preservation in transgender body modifications. Bioethical Inquiry, 9, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Musolino, C., Warin, M., Wade, T., & Gilchrist, P. (2015). ‘Healthy anorexia’: The complexity of care in disordered eating. Social Science & Medicine, 139, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Nettleton, S. (1995). The sociology of health and illness. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  94. Nettleton, S., & Watson, J. (1998). The body in everyday life. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Nordqvist, P., & Smart, C. (2014). Relative strangers: Family life, genes and donor conception. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ortiz-Gómez, T., & Santesmases, M. J. (2014). Gendered drugs and medicine historical and socio-cultural perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  97. Payne, S. (2006). The health of men & women. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  98. Peterson, A., & Bunton, R. (Eds.). (1997). Foucault, health and medicine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  99. Phillips, G., & Green, J. (2015). Working for the public health: Politics, localism and epistemologies of practice. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(4), 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Pitts-Taylor, V. (2003). In the flesh: The cultural politics of body modification. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pitts-Taylor, V. (2007). Surgery junkies: Wellness and pathology in cosmetic culture. Rutgers: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Pitts-Taylor, V. (2016). The brain’s body: Neuroscience and corporeal politics. Durham: North Carolina, Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Roberts, T. K., & Fantz, C. R. (2014). Barriers to quality health care for the transgender population. Clinical Biochemistry, 47, 983–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rojek, C. (1986). Problems of involvement and detachment in the writings of Norbert Elias. British Journal of Sociology, 37(4), 584–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rose, N. (2001). The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Salecl, R. (2001). Cut in the body: From clitoridectomy to body art. In S. Ahmed & J. Stacey (Eds.), Thinking through the skin (pp. 21–35). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Scambler, G., & Higgs, P. (Eds.). (1998). Modernity, medicine and health: Medical sociology towards 2000. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. Scheffler, I. (1974). Four pragmatists: A critical introduction to Peirce, James, Mead and Dewey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  110. Scheper-Hughes, N., & Lock, M. M. (1987). The mindful body: A prolegomenon to future work in medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1(1), 6–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schillmeier, M. (2014). Eventful bodies: The cosmopolitics of illness. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  112. Shaw, M., Doröling, D., & Mitchell, R. (2002). Health, place and society. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  113. Sheaff, M. (2005). Sociology & health care. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  115. Shildrick, M. (2002). Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  116. Shilling, C. (2005). The body in culture, technology and society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  117. Shilling, C. (2008). Changing bodies: Habit, crisis and creativity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  118. Shiva, V. (2016). Who really feeds the world?: The failures of agribusiness and the promise of agroecology. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  119. Stabile, C. A. (1994). Feminism and the technological fix. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Tulle, E. (2007). Running to run: Embodiment, structure and agency amongst veteran elite runners. Sociology, 41(2), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Turner, B. (1987). Medical power and social knowledge. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  122. Turner, B. (1991). Recent developments in the theory of the body. In M. Featherston, M. Hepworth, & B. Turner (Eds.), The body: Social process and cultural theory (pp. 1–35). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  123. Turner, B. (1992). Regulating bodies: Essays in medical sociology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Turner, B. (2008). The body & society. London: Sage. (Third Edition). First published 1984.Google Scholar
  125. Urla, J., & Terry, J. (1995). Introduction: Mapping embodied deviance. In J. Terry & J. Urla (Eds.), Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular cultures (pp. 1–18). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  126. Vågerö, D., & Illsley, R. (2004). Explaining health inequalities: Beyond Black and Barker. In M. Bury & J. Gabe (Eds.), The sociology of health and illness (pp. 122–133). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  127. Wahlert, L., & Fiester, A. (2012). Commentary: The questions we shouldn’t ask. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 21, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Webster, A. (2007). Health, technology & society: A sociological critique. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wetherell, M. (2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body and Society, 21(2), 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  131. Williams, S. J. (2003). Medicine and the body. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  132. Williams, S. J., & Bendelow, G. (1996). Emotions, health and illness: The ‘missing link’ in medical sociology? In Sociology of health & illness monograph series (pp. 25–53). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  133. Williams, S. J., & Bendelow, G. (1998). The lived body: Sociological themes, embodied issues. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations