Abstract
‘Health, Culture and Society’ has been explored in classic texts by a diverse range of scholars. We want to demonstrate that enduring concepts have consistently been complex and contested. We pose questions about the ways they have been defined, used and applied to health. Our tone is recharging arguments through enduring concepts, and we want to demonstrate the relevance of these concepts to practice and apply them in an overtly political way to the ‘here and now’. While these enduring concepts are commonly used, they are at times used inappropriately. We take a unique approach to the configuration of ‘Health, Culture and Society’. Despite the wealth of material in medical sociology and medical anthropology, no existing texts attempt to take on the approach we offer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Best, S., & Keller, D. (2001). The postmodern adventure: Science, technology and cultural studies at the third millennium. London: Routledge.
Blaxter, M. (1990). Health and lifestyles. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
Blaxter, M. (2010). Health (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourgeois, P. (1995). In search of respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bury, M. (1997). Health and illness in a changing society. London: Routledge.
Clarke, A. E., & Olsen, V. L. (Eds.). (1999). Revisioning women, health and healing feminist, cultural and Technoscience perspectives. New York/London: Routledge.
Clarke, A. E., & Shim, J. (2011). Medicalization and biomedicalization revisited: Technoscience and transformations of health, illness and American medicine. In B. A. Pescosolido, J. K. Martin, J. D. McLeod, & A. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of health, illness and healing: A blueprint for the 21st century (pp. 173–199). New York: Springer.
Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68, 161–194.
Clarke, A. E., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., Fishman, J. R., & Shim, J. K. (Eds.). (2010a). Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S. Durham: Duke University Press.
Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2010b). Biomedicalization: A theoretical and substantive introduction. In A. E. Clarke, L. Mamo, J. R. Fosket, J. R. Fishman, & J. K. Shim (Eds.), Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S. (pp. 1–43). Durham: Duke University Press.
Conrad, P. (2001). Preface. In The sociology of health and illness: Critical perspectives. New York: Worth Publications.
Douglas, M. (1969). Purity and danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Doyal, L. (1979). The political economy of health. London: Pluto Press.
Farmer, P. (2004). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied progress: A cultural account of assisted conception. London: Routledge.
Friedson, E. (1970). Professional dominance: The social structure of medical care. New York: Atherton Press.
Good, B. (1994). Medicine, rationality and experience: An anthropological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Helman, C. (2007). Culture health & illness (5th ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.
Hill Collins, P. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32. Special Theory Issue (October–December, 1986).
Inhorn, M. (2003). Local babies, global science: Gender, religion and in vitro fertilisation in Egypt. New York: Routledge.
Jordan, B. (1993). Birth in four cultures: A cross-cultural investigation of childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden and the United States (4th ed.). Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives. New York: Basic Books.
Lock, M. (2002). Twice dead: Organ transplants and the reinvention of death. Berkeley: University of California.
Lorber, J. (1997). Gender and the social construction of illness. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lupton, D. (1994). Medicine as culture: Illness, disease and the body in Western societies. London: Sage.
Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Rapp, R. (2000). Testing the woman: Testing the fetus. New York: Routledge.
Scheper-Hughes, N. (1993). Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Strauss, A. L., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., & Wiener, C. (Eds.). (1985/1997). Social organization of medical work (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. New Brunswick: Transaction Press (2nd ed.).
Strauss, A. L., Schatzman, L., Bucher, R., Ehrlich, D., & Sabshin, M. (1964). Psychiatric ideologies and institutions. Glencoe: Free Press.
White, K. (2002). An introduction to the sociology of health and illness. London: Sage.
Williams, S. J. (2003). Medicine and the body. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ettorre, E., Annandale, E., Hildebrand, V.M., Porroche-Escudero, A. (2017). Why Conceptual Legacies and Contemporary Applications?. In: Health, Culture and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60786-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60786-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60785-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60786-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)