Assessing the Effectiveness of Climate Finance: Composite Indicators and Quantile Regression
In this chapter we briefly explain methods proposed to assess the effectiveness of the climate funds to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions.
Greenhouse gas emissions are constituted by Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), Nitrous oxide (N2O) and Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydro chlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), together called F-gases.
Considering the multidimensional concept and the complexity of the topic we first explain the composite indicator as useful tools to summarize in one indicator the individual components of the greenhouse gas emissions and to compare performances of the countries. Second, we describe the quantile regression, focusing on the theory and possible applications in research fields of interest. Quantile regression, in fact, is one of the tools used to assess the effects of economic policies on some of the target variables.
KeywordsGreenhouse gas Composite indicators Principal components analysis Weighting methods Quantile regression Clustered data
- Allison PD (2001) Missing data, sage university papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no. 07–136, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Chamberlain G (1994) Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wages. In: CA Sims (Ed.) Advances in Econometrics: Volume 1: Sixth World Congress, chapter 5, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Davino C, Furno M, Vistocco D (2014) Quantile regression. Theory and applications. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Government Statistical Service (GSS) (1996) Report of the task force on imputation, government statistical service methodology series, 3, LondonGoogle Scholar
- IEA, World Energy Outlook 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
- IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, SokonaY, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T and Minx JC (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs R, Smith P, Goddard M (2004) Measuring performance: an examination of composite performance indicators, Centre for Health Economics, Technical Paper Series 29Google Scholar
- Little RJA, Rubin DB (2002) Statistical analysis with missing data, wiley interscience. J. Wiley &Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Liu X (2005) Explaining the relationship between CO2 emissions and national income—The role of energy consumption. Econ Lett 87(3), June 2005, 325–328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.09.015
- Melyn W, Moesen WW (1991) Towards a synthetic indicator of macroeconomic performance: unequal weighting when limited information is available, Public Economic research Paper 17, CES, KU LeuvenGoogle Scholar
- Munda G (2005a) Multi-criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple-criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Munda G (2007) Social multi-criteria evaluation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg/New York. Economics SeriesGoogle Scholar
- Mundaca L, Román R, Cansino JM (2015) Towards a green energy economy? A macroeconomic-climate evaluation of Sweden’s CO2 emissions. Appl Energy 148, 15 June 2015, 196–209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.029
- Nardo M, Tarantola S, Saltelli A, Andropoulos C, Buescher R, Karageorgos G, Latvala A, Noel F (2004) The e-business readiness composite indicator for 2003: a pilot study, EUR 21294Google Scholar
- Nicoletti G, Scarpetta S, Boylaud O (2000) Summary indicators of product market regulation with an extension to employment protection legislation, OECD, Economics department working papers No. 226, ECO/WKP(99)18. http://www.oecd.org/eco/eco
- OECD (2008) Handbok on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Quintano C, Castellano R (2001) Strategies for dealing with non-responses for quality in some ISTAT surveys, Essays-ISTAT, n 11: 1–110Google Scholar
- Saisana M, Tarantola S (2002) State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development, EUR 20408 EN. Italy, European Commission-JRCGoogle Scholar
- Yu K, Lu Z, Stander J (2003) Quantile regression: applications and current research areas. The Statistician 52(3):331–350Google Scholar