Advertisement

Climate Finance

  • Antonio A. Romano
  • Giuseppe Scandurra
  • Alfonso Carfora
  • Monica Ronghi
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Climate Studies book series (BRIEFSCLIMATE)

Abstract

Since 1992, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has set out a framework for international action to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) to prevent dangerous climate change. The UNFCCC recognizes that developed country Parties (Annex II Parties) have to provide financial resources to assist developing country Parties in implementing the set goals.

During the 15th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP15) held in Copenhagen, the developed countries pledged to cooperatively provide USD 100 billion annually by 2020 to developing countries and guaranteed immediate “Fast-start Finance” of up to USD 30 billion over 2010–2012 to launch the project. Such financing can support developing nations by enabling poorer countries to move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development pathways.

In this chapter we focus on climate finance as it appears from the meetings that have taken place from the COP1 to the COP22. We propose a first analysis of the financial flows intended to promote energy generation and supply with renewable sources and those funds intended for the protection of the physical environment in order to identify preferential channels in “Fast-start finance” distribution and whether these preferences can affect the effectiveness of such measures.

Keywords

Conference of the Parties Climate finance Fast Start Finance Funds’ distribution Energy generation Biosphere protection 

References

  1. Agence Française de Développement, “AFD’s Strategy in Turkey”, (2015) Available at http://www.afd.fr/webdav/site/afd/shared/PUBLICATIONS/THEMATIQUES/AFD_Turquie_GB.pdf. Accessed 07 Oct 2016
  2. Bazilian M, Nussbaumer P, Gualberti G, Haites E, Levi M, Siegel J, Fenhann J (2011) Informing the financing of universal energy access: An assessment of current financial flows. Electr J 24(7):57–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tej.2011.07.006 Google Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyya SC (2013) Financing energy access and off-grid electrification: A review of status, options and challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev 20:462–472. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigsten A, Tengstam S (2015) International coordination and the effectiveness of aid. World Dev 69:75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird N, Tilly H, Trujillo NC, Tumushabe G, Welham B, and Yanda P (2013) Measuring the effectiveness of public climate finance delivery at the national level, ODI; London. http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8303.pdf. Accessed 08 Oct 2016]
  6. Bourguignon F, Platteau JP (2015) The hard challenge of aid coordination. World Dev 69:86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunner S, Enting K (2014) Climate finance: a transaction cost perspective on the structure of state-to-state transfers. Glob Environ Chang 27:138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis J, Caruso R, Ockenden S (2013) Exploring climate finance effectiveness, Climate Change Expert Group Paper No. 2013(4). OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Espagne E (2016) Climate finance at COP21 and after: lessons learnt, CEPII, Policy Brief, No 9 – February 2016. CEPII research center, Paris. http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/pb/2016/pb2016-09.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2016Google Scholar
  10. Indipendent Commission for Aid Impact (2014) The UK’s international climate funds. ICAI Report 38 http://icai.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/ICAI-Report-International-Climate-Fund.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2017
  11. Keeley AR (2016) Renewable energy in pacific small island developing states: the role of international aid and the enabling environment from donor’s perspectives. J Clean Prod. Available online 11 May 2016, doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.011. Accessed 3 Oct 2016
  12. Markandya A, Antimiani A, Costantini V, Martini C, Palma A, Tommasino MC (2015) Analyzing trade-offs in international climate policy options: The case of the green climate fund. World Dev 74:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marquardt J, Steinbacher K, Schreurs M (2016) Driving force or forced transition?: The role of development cooperation in promoting energy transitions in the Philippines and Morocco. J Clean Prod 128:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakhooda S (2013) The effectiveness of climate finance: a review of global environment facility. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakhooda S, Norman M (2014) Climate finance: is it making a difference? a review of the effectiveness of multilateral climate funds. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Nakhooda S, Fransen T, Kuramochi T, Caravani A, Prizzon A, Shimizu N, Tilley H, Halimanjaya A, Welham B (2013) Mobilising international climate finance: lessons from the fast-start finance period. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. OECD (2008) Handbok on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and User Guide. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. OECD (2015) Climate finance in 2013–14 and the USD 100 billion goal. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Pickering J, Skovgaard J, Kim S, Roberts JT, Rossati D, Stadelmann M, Reich H (2015) Acting on climate finance pledges: Inter-agency dynamics and relationships with aid in contributor states. World Dev 68:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tierney MJ, Nielson DL, Hawkins DG, Timmons Roberts J, Findley MG, Powers RM, Parks B, Wilson SE, Hicks RL (2011) More dollars than sense: refining our knowledge of development finance using AidData. World Dev 39(11):1891–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tirpak D, Brown L, Ronquillo-Ballesteros A (2014) Monitoring climate finance in developing countries: challenges and next steps. World Resources Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Tol RS (2017) The structure of the climate debate. Energy Policy 104(May 2017):431–438. ISSN 0301-4215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. UNFCCC (2014) Biennial assessment and overview of climate finance flows 2014. Accessible at: http://unfccc.int/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/standing_committee/items/2807.php
  24. UNFCCC (2016b) Report of the conference of the parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session. United Nations Office at Geneva, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. UNFCCC (2016a) Summary and recommendations by the standing committee on finance on the 2016 biennial assessment and overview of climate finance flows. Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance FlowsGoogle Scholar
  26. Urpelainen J (2012) Strategic problems in North–South climate finance: creating joint gains for donors and recipients. Environ Sci Pol 21:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao SX, Chan RC, Chan NYM (2012) Spatial polarization and dynamic pathways of foreign direct investment in China 1990–2009. Geoforum 43(4):836–850. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio A. Romano
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Scandurra
    • 1
  • Alfonso Carfora
    • 2
  • Monica Ronghi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management Studies and Quantitative MethodsUniversity of Naples “Parthenope”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Italian Revenue AgencyRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations