Skip to main content

Clerical Fascism: Chile and Austria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 442 Accesses

Part of the book series: Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics ((AIEE))

Abstract

Had Hayek and Mises been genuine Classical Liberals they would have objected to human rights abuses; had they been White Terror promoters masquerading as scholars they would have been indifferent. Mises insisted that countries where order is maintained by ‘the knout and the prison-camp’ should be left ‘alone’; and Hayek objected to ‘interference with the policy of other countries.’ Mises praised the achievements of Fascist Austria and its one-party Corporatist State; and Hayek defended the ‘one-party’ state, Pinochet’s Chile, and the ‘civilisation’ of apartheid from the American ‘fashion’ of ‘human rights’ while dismissing Amnesty International’s evidence about Pinochet’s human rights abuses as ‘allegations’ from ‘a bunch of leftists.’ This chapter describes some common White Terror characteristics of the Clerical Fascist regimes that ruled Austria (1934–1945) and Chile (1973–1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leeson, R. (2017). Clerical Fascism: Chile and Austria. In: Leeson, R. (eds) Hayek: A Collaborative Biography. Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60708-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60708-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60707-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60708-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics