Abstract
The purpose of the article is to develop a model of global crisis management of entrepreneurial activities, which allows increasing sustainability of modern enterprises against crisis. The authors use the method of time rows analysis to analyze the sense, dynamics, and global consequences of entrepreneurial activity crisis by the example of the financial crisis that started in 2008 on the basis of experience of the USA, Germany, Japan, Russia, and the global economy on the whole. The authors determine and analyze existing approaches to the global crisis management with the help of methods of systematization, classification, and comparative analysis and evaluate their effectiveness by the example of modern Russia at the macro-level with the help of the proprietary method. Three levels of the global crisis management are distinguished: microlevel, at which certain enterprises take measures for preparation for future crises and increase of sustainability of business to influence the global economic recession; macro-level, within which certain countries realize state policy on protection of domestic entrepreneurship from the influence of global crisis; and global level, at which efforts of groups of countries and international organizations are aimed at stabilization of international economic situation. As a result of the research, the authors came to the conclusion that diversification approach is the most effective one, which is followed by insurance and political approach; however, effectiveness of these approaches is rather low. As a perspective direction of increase of effectiveness of global crisis management of entrepreneurial activities in the context of the countries’ orientation at building postindustrial economy, this work offers an innovation-oriented model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Tahous M (2016) Crisis management and business continuity in the Kuwaiti oil sector. Higher education in the twenty-first century II—papers From the two-day workshop, pp 55–64
Avery EJ, Graham M, Park S (2016) Planning makes (closer to) perfect: exploring United States’ local government officials’ evaluations of crisis management. J Conting Crisis Manag 24(2):73–81. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12109
Bartz W, Winkler A (2016) Flexible or fragile? The growth performance of small and young businesses during the global financial crisis—evidence from Germany. J Bus Ventur 31(2):196–215. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.10.002
D’Angelo MJ, Brunstein J, Mainardes EW (2015) Transforming crises into opportunities to generate sustainable business in Brazil. In: Handbook of research on global competitive advantage through innovation and entrepreneurship, pp 46–60. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8348-8.ch004
Dahles H, Susilowati TP (2015) Business resilience in times of growth and crisis. Ann Tour Res 51:34–50. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2015.01.002
Fabregá MB, Nicolau AR (2016) Entrepreneurship and business survival in times of crisis: the case of Barcelona | [Emprendimiento y supervivencia empresarial en época de crisis: El caso de Barcelona]. Intangible Cap 12(1):95–120. doi:10.3926/ic.689
Grynchyshyn Y (2016) Evolution of European approach to using financial restructuring in the system of crisis management of enterprises. Econ Ann XXI 156(1–2):63–66. doi:10.21003/ea.V156-0014
Kravets A, Shcherbakov M, Kultsova M, Iijima T (2014) Knowledge-based software engineering. In: 11th joint conference, JCKBSE 2014, Volgograd, Russia, September 17–20, 2014. Proceedings (2014). Commun Comput Inf Sci 466 CCIS 24(1):56–81
Kundenko A, Dorosh M, Baraniuk I, Itchenko D (2015) Crisis management of small and medium businesses in regional economic policy system. Econ Ann XXI 5–6:108–111
Ministry of Economic Development of the RF (2015) Russia’s economy in 2008-2013 Russia. Ministry of Economic Development of the RF, Moscow, p 335
Morel G, Chauvin C (2016) Crisis management: what are the methodological challenges for ergonomics? Trav Hum 79(1):71–92
Persakis A, Iatridis GE (2016) Audit quality, investor protection and earnings management during the financial crisis of 2008: an international perspective. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 41:73–101. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2015.12.006
RIA-news (2013) Global financial crisis of 2008 and consequences for Russia. http://ria.ru/spravka/20130816/956672411.html. Accessed on 6 Jun 2016
Skiter N, Semenychev V, Litvinova TN (2015) Model of economic growth in Russia under conditions of integration into the world economy. Appl Econ Int Dev 15(2):63–70
Snidaro L, Visentini I (2016) Network methods and plan recognition for fusion in crisis management. In: Fusion methodologies in crisis management: higher level fusion and decision making, pp 287–312. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22527-2_14
Takagi S (2016) Applying the lessons of Asia: the IMF’s Crisis management strategy following the global financial crisis. Int Econ J 1–25. doi:10.1080/10168737.2015.1136669
Verkhovskaya OR, Dorokhina MV (2015) Global monitoring of entrepreneurship: national report. Russia, Higher School of Management of St. Petersburg State University, p 56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Natsubidze, A.S., Likholetov, E.A., Malofeev, A.V., Zabaznova, T.A., Patsyuk, E.V. (2017). Model of Global Crisis Management of Entrepreneurial Activities. In: Popkova, E. (eds) Overcoming Uncertainty of Institutional Environment as a Tool of Global Crisis Management. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60696-5_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60696-5_65
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60695-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60696-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)