Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Chapter 6 Moral Virtue and the Principles of Practical Reason

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Reproductive Genetics

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 128))

  • 703 Accesses

Abstract

This paper addresses the claim that we have a moral obligation, where a choice can be made, to bring to birth the ‘best’ child possible. Savulescu has termed this demand the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. Thus far, a number of critical arguments have been put forward to discredit this Principle. Some focus mainly on the consequences which would follow from establishment of such an obligation, others appeal to the philosophical assumptions on which this principle is based. After a short presentation of the state of the debate over the principles of reproductive decisions, I formulate two counter-arguments which aim to demonstrate that in so far as we identify the claim that parents have some reasons to produce the best children possible and the more radical claim that they are morally obliged to attempt to do this, as biomedical decisions guidance they have little prospect of success in providing the best life possible for their children. To elucidate this problem, I turn to the ancient idea of the “good life” and to the virtue ethics with its fundamental concepts of practical wisdom and eudaimonia, which, as I argue, may provide us with a deeper understanding of what the “good life” consists in and with an explanation of what truly determines the quality of individual and one’s self-fulfillment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annas J (1993) The morality of happiness. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1915) Works (trans:Smith JA, Ross WD). Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1973) Ethics (trans:Ackrill JL). Faber & Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1998) Politics (trans: Reeve CDC). Hackett Publishing Company Inc., Indianapolis/Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1999) Nicomachean ethics (trans: Irwin T). Hackett Publishing Company Inc., Indianapolis/Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett R (2009) The fallacy of the principle of procreative beneficence. Bioethics 23(5):265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N (2003) The transhumanist FAQ – a general introduction (Version 2.1.). http://www.nickbostrom.com/. Accessed 10 Jun 2016

  • Bostrom N (2005) In defence of posthuman dignity. Bioethics 19:202–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadie S (2012) Aristotle and beyond. Essays on metaphysics and ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas T (2008) Moral enhancement. J Appl Philos 25(3):228–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover J (1992) Future people, disability, and screening. In: Laslett P, Fishkin J (eds) Justice between age groups and generations. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2003) The future of human nature. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare R (2002) The abnormal child. Moral dilemmas of doctors and parents. In: idem essays on bioethics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (2001) One principle and three fallacies of disability studies. J Med Ethics 27:383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (2007) Enhancing evolution. The ethical case for making better people. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Herissone-Kelly J (2006) Procreative beneficence and the prospective parents. J Med Ethics 32(3):166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotke A (2014) The principle of procreative beneficence: old arguments and a new challenge. Bioethics 28(5):255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse R (1999) On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm FM (2013) Bioethical prescriptions to create, end, choose, and improve lives. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kass L (2003) Beyond therapy: biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Prepared for the president’s council on bioethics. Regan Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kołakowski L (1971) Killing handicapped babies as the fundamental problem of philosophy. In: Choices on our conscience. An international symposium on human rights, retardation and research, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden RB (1984) On some vices of virtue ethics. Am Philos Q 21:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden RB (1990) Virtue ethics and anti-theory. Philosophia 20:93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben B (2004) Enough: staying human in an engineered age. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill O (2007) Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker M (2007) The best possible child. J Med Ethics 33(5):279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson I, Savulescu J (2008) The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. J Appl Philos 25(3):162–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1973) Laches and Charmides (trans: Sprague RK). The Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc., Indianapolis/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell DC (2009) Practical intelligence and the virtues. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel M (2007) The case against perfection. Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J (2001) Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15(5/6):413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J, Kahane G (2009) The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics 23(5):274–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J, Persson I (2012) Unfit for the future: the need for moral enhancement. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer GO, Kahane G, Savulescu J (2014) Autonomy and enhancement. Neuroethics 7(2):123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare T (1998) Choice and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability and equality. Disability & Society 13(5):665–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (2011) Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soniewicka M (2015) Failures of imagination: disability and the ethics of selective reproduction. Bioethics 29(8):557–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow R (2007) Procreative beneficence, obligation, and eugenics. Genomics, Society and Policy 3:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow R (2011) A not-so-new eugenics. Hastings Cent Rep 41:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller SE (2008) Why we are not morally required to select the best children: a response to Savulescu. Bioethics 22(7):364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker M (2009) Enhancing genetic virtue. A Project for twenty-first century humanity? Politics Life Sci 2(28):27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warmbier A (2015) Moral perfection and the demand for human enhancement. Ethics in Progress 6(1):23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmbier A (2017) Moral enhancement. Enhancing motivational process and agent-based ethics. In: Warmbier A (ed) The idea of excellence and human enhancement. Reconsidering the debate on transhumanism in light of moral philosophy and science. Peter Lang GmbH, Frankfurt am Main. (in print)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

    Adriana Warmbier

Authors
  1. Adriana Warmbier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Warmbier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Ethics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

    Marta Soniewicka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Warmbier, A. (2018). Chapter 6 Moral Virtue and the Principles of Practical Reason. In: Soniewicka, M. (eds) The Ethics of Reproductive Genetics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 128. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60684-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation