Skip to main content

Promoting Healthy Leader–Follower Dynamics to Enhance Workplace Equality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Inclusive Leadership

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership ((PASTLEFO))

Abstract

For five decades literature and research has exposed the entrenched and enduring factors that reproduce inequality in workplaces and offered effective methods to address it. However, inequality in pay status and opportunity continues, most noticeably for the targeted equity groups of women, people from non-English-speaking backgrounds, people with disabilities and people with LGBT orientations. The complex structural factors that reproduce inequality in organizations are so entrenched that they have formed ‘inequality regimes’ (Acker, Gend Soc 20(4): 441–464, 2006) that are highly resistant to change. Leaders can negotiate and change these gendered spaces for the better, and a healthy leader–follower dynamic is part of that solution. More leaders need to have transformational leadership qualities in order to challenge stereotypical biases against women, the practice of ‘homo-sociability’ in management and the structures that reproduce ‘inequality regimes’ within organizations. Progress toward equity has stalled since the 1990s due to the strengthening of perceptual biases against women, the lack of government programs to address gender inequity and the practice of devolving responsibility for Equal Employment Opportunity programs to a ‘managing diversity’ process within human resources departments. Leaders and followers can either participate in the continuation of inequality by allowing inequality regimes to continue or work for change by adopting a more inclusive and transformational leadership style and implementing the recommendations for change to improve equity. The chapter will discuss the characteristics of a healthy leader–follower dynamic that is open and authentic and focuses on merit, fairness and transparency in order to foster and enhance workplace equality. Recommendations for a ‘Charter for Equity’ that leaders can follow to bring about workplace equality will also be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abendroth, A., Melzer, S., Kalev, A., & Tomaskouk-Devey, D. (2016). Women at work: Women’s access to power and the gender earnings gap. ILR Review. doi:10.1177/0019793916668530. Downloaded 8 Sept 2016.

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adapa, S., Rindfleish, J., & Sheridan, A. (2016). ‘Doing Gender’ in a regional context: Explaining women’s absence from senior roles in regional accounting firms in Australia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 35, 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Due Billing, Y. (1997). Understanding gender and organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). The nature of leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (1990). Same difference. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsh, J., Nudelman, S., & Yee, L. (2013, April). Lessons from the leading edge of gender diversity. McKinsey Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C. (1991). The promise and the price: The struggle for equal opportunity in women’s employment. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C. (1996). The role of employment equity units in the public sector and in universities. The Journal of Public Administration, 55(3), 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliper Organisation. (2014). Whitepaper: The qualities that distinguish women leaders. Retrieved from http://www.calipercorp.com/portfolio/the-qualities-that-distinguish-women-leaders/

  • Cartwright, S., & Gale, A. (1995). Project management: Different gender, different culture? A discussion on gender and organizational culture – part 2. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 16(4), 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassells, R., Duncan, A., & Ong, R. (2016, March). Gender equity insights 2016: Inside Australia’s gender pay gap. BCEC/WGEA Gender Equity Series, Issue #1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Economic Development of Australia (CEDA). (2013). Women in leadership: Understanding the gender gap. Melbourne: CEDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, S. (2013, February). Why gender equality stalled. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. (1996). Leading women. Sydney: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, H. (2009, March 23). Women better fund managers than men. Financial Times (London, UK), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, J., McGannon, C., & Ginnivan, L. (2012). Game-changers: Economic reform priorities for Australia. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J., Kersley, R., & Natella, S. (2016). The CS 3000: The reward for change. Zurich: Credit Suisse AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mascia, S. (2015). Are women better leaders than men? Human Resource Management International Digest, 23(7), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezso, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1072–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance? Journal of Social Issues, 72(1), 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 685–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EMILY’S List Australia. (2015). Status of women report 2015. Melbourne: Emily’s List.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, K. (2014, October). Why women are better managers than men. Gallup Business Journal, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, E., Stachan, G., & Burgess, J. (2012). The challenges in developing a strategic approach to managing diversity. EDI Conference, Toulouse, 23–25 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, B. (1964). The feminine mystique. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant Thornton International Ltd. (2015). Women in business: The value of diversity. London: Grant Thornton International Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J., & Parkin, W. (1987). Sex at work: The power and paradox of organisational sexuality. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccola, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, A. (2015). Workplace leadership perceptions between men and women. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30(8), 598–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, J. (2016). Ethical leadership: How to develop ethical leaders (Transpersonal leadership series: White paper one, leader shape). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (1984). Women managers: Travellers in a male world. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2013). Foreword, Women in leadership: Understanding the gender gap, Committee for the Economic Development of Australia (CEDA), Australia, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company. (2015, November). A CEO’s guide to gender equality, executive briefing. McKinsey Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medhora, S. (2016, April 20). Women in politics: Sex discrimination commissioner open to idea of quotas. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. (2012). Identities & inequalities (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, P. (2015). Gender, power and organization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. (2016, June 30). Crumbs from the table: There’s nary a scrap for women in this election. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, C. (2015). When is female leadership an advantage? Coordination requirements, team cohesion, and team interaction norms. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 36, 1153–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Graves, L. M. (2003). Women and men in management (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, H. (2013, June). The young and the restless: Gen Y and the 21st century barriers to women in leadership. CEDA: Understanding the gender gap. 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleish, J. (2002). Senior management women and gender equality. Equal Opportunities International, 21(7), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1998). Doing leadership differently. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. R., & Hutchinson, J. (1995). Gender: A strategic management issue. Sydney: Business & Professional Publishing Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Australian Government Report. (2015). Gender equality in leadership: A strategy for gender equality in leadership in South Australian public sector. Adelaide: The South Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • The United Nations (UN). (2016). UN women report: Facts and figures: Leadership and political participation.New York: The United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., Martin, R., Epitropaki, O., Guillaume, Y., & Lee, A. (2013). Social cognition in leader-follower relationships: Applying insights from relationship science to understanding relationship-based approaches to leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S65–S81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting, S., Perales, F., & Baxter, J. (2016). Gender, ethnicity and the division of household labour within heterosexual couples in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (1999). Managing like a man. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, J., & Wood, R. (2013). Targets and quotas for women in leadership: A global review of policy, practice and psychological research. Melbourne: Melbourne Business School, The Centre for Ethical Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P. (2013). The financial impact of welfare, tax and childcare arrangements. Women in leadership: Understanding the gender gap. Committee for Economic Development Australia (CEDA), Australia, 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rindfleish, J. (2018). Promoting Healthy Leader–Follower Dynamics to Enhance Workplace Equality. In: Adapa, S., Sheridan, A. (eds) Inclusive Leadership. Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60666-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics