Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Female Leadership Within the Military: The Influence of Neoliberal Institutionalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Inclusive Leadership

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership ((PASTLEFO))

Abstract

Approximately one third of senior management positions across government departments in the UK are held by women. One exception to this pattern is the military arm of the UK’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) where the figure drops to below two per cent. To gain greater insight into what might account for this high variation relative to other departments, an exploratory case study was conducted in the UK’s MoD. The study investigated the structural and individual impediments faced by women seeking access to the highest organisational leadership echelons. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 52 high-ranked female officers drawn from all three military services. Because changes occurring within the UK government departments are informed primarily by neoliberalism and this ideology strongly values entrepreneurship, the specific leadership lens used for analysis drew heavily on entrepreneurial theories. The findings revealed a complex, dynamic interrelationship involving context, structure, agency and networks. The recursive relationship among these four components at the level of the individual represented a rich mixture of cognitive interpretation, risk taking, opportunity recognition and the use of scarce resources. Evidence was found which demonstrated that female institutional leaders could increase their career progression chances by minimising institutional deviation, thereby allowing individuals to benefit from increased leadership legitimacy. However, the evidence also suggested that women still faced many impediments which were inhibiting their chances of reaching the very top leadership roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acker, J. (1988). Class, gender, and the relations of distribution. Signs, 13(3), 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 138–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5), 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2013). Epistemology, opportunities, and entrepreneurship: Comments on Venkataraman et al. (2012) and Shane (2012). Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 154–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J. B. J., & Autio, E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and leadership. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (SIOP organizational frontiers series, pp. 189–208). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C., & Eveline, J. (2003). Mainstreaming and neoliberalism: A contested relationship. Policy and Society, 22(2), 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, H. (1998). Competent to collaborate: Towards a competency-based model for inter professional education. Journal of Inter Professional Care, 12(2), 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, D., & Dibben, P. (2010). Public sector innovation and entrepreneurship; case studies from local government. Local Government Studies, 28(4), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batmanghlich, C. A. (2014). Why leaders fail ethically: A paradigmatic evaluation of leadership. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2013). RAF nurse Wendy Williams wins sexism tribunal. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-23053008

  • Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, N. G. (1997). Gender, place and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 9(3), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevelander, D., & Page, M. (2011). Ms. Trust: Gender, networks and trust— implications for management and education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(4), 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 2328, 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organi-zational Behaviours, 22, 345–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., Hogarth, R. M., & Michaud, C. (2000). The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science, 11(2), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callewaert, S. (2006). Bourdieu, critic of Foucault the case of empirical social science against double-game-philosophy. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(6), 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P., & Sherer, P. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for meso level approach. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 13, 55–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., Anderson, S., & Shaw, E. (2001). Women’s business ownership: A review of the academic, popular and internet literature. Report to the Small Business Service. Strathclyde University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caton, J. (2015). Entrepreneurship in the public sector: When middle managers create value. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 4(2), 275–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, M. (2015). R. Taylor-Norton, Britain faces further cuts to armed forces. The Guardian. Retrieved March 10, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/news/defence-and-security-blog/2015/mar/09/britain-faces-further-cuts-to-armed-forces

  • Chartered Management Institute. (2013). Women in Leadership Chartered Management Institute & Women in Management (White Paper). Accessed at: http://www.managers.org.uk/insights/research/current-research/2013/march/women-in-leadership-white-paper

  • Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2004). The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship: Mutual lessons to be learned. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 771–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R., Fawcett, B., & Meagher, G. (2009). Neoliberalism, new public management and the human service professions: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den-Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., & Dorfman, P. W. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diefenbach, F. E. (2011). Entrepreneurship in the public sector (pp. 31–64). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1988a). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1988b). The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154(4), 696–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization Studies, 26(3), 385–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EHRC. (2011). Women in ‘top jobs’ in the UK 2011–2012, equality human rights commission. London: The Stationery Office, Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., Pallud, J., & Kalika, M. (2011). The influence of individual, contextual, and social factors on perceived behavioral control of information technology: A field theory approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. The America Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young. (2016). Senior civil service women’s leadership index 2016 UK. Accessed at: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-senior-civil-service-womens-leaders-index-UK/$FILE/EY-senior-civil-service-womens-leaders-index-UK.pdf

  • Eyal, O., & Kark, R. (2004). How do transformational leaders transform organizations? A study of the relationship between leadership and entrepreneurship. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2003). Women entrepreneurs: A critical review of the literature. Edmonton: Department of Educational Policy Studies, University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, S. M., & Leenders, R. T. A. J. (1999). CSC: The structure of advantage and disadvantage. In R. T. A. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 1–14). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, S. M., & Zuckerman, E. W. (1998). Social capital and opportunity in corporate R and D: The contingent effect of contact density on mobility expectations. Social Science Research, 27, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1988). ‘Who is an entrepreneur?’ Is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism (Vol. 1): Power, property and the state. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D., McKone-Sweet, K., & Wilson, H. J. (2011). The new entrepreneurial leader: Developing leaders who shape social and economic opportunity. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V., Macmillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three institutionalisms. Political Studies, XLIV, 936–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. M. (1994). Entrepreneurship and leadership: The implications for education and development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 6(2), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, M. (2007). Dictionary of critical realism. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1989). In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 398–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. G., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). Leadership deja vu all over again. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 435–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. F. (1960). Towards the explication of the concept of leadership in terms of the concept of power. Human Relations, 13, 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. (2001). In praise of context. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 22, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behaviour. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, D. L., Dhanani, L. Y., Shen, W., McHugh, B. C., & McCord, M. A. (2015). Is a happy leader a good leader? A meta-analytic investigation of leader trait affect and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(4), 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, M. (1998). Faithful and fearless: Moving feminist protest inside the church and military. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. (2007). Gender, institutions and power: A critical review. Politics, 27(2), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., Tsai, W., & Hanke, R. (2006). A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1021–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). 1.6 Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., & Scully, M. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28(7), 971–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38(3), 599–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marttila, T. (2013). The culture of enterprise in neoliberalism: Spectres of entrepreneurship (Vol. 87). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNae, R., & Vali, K. (2015). Diverse experiences of women leading in higher education: Locating networks and agency for leadership within a university context in Papua New Guinea. Gender and Education, 27(3), 288–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. G., & Kaptchuk, T. J. (2008). The power of context: Reconceptualizing the placebo effect. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(5), 222–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defence. (2016). UK Armed Forces: Biannual diversity statistics. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/530586/Biannual_Diversity_Statistics_1Apr16_revised.pdf

  • Miroff, B. (2003). Entrepreneurship and leadership. Studies in American Political Development, 17(02), 204–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., & Jones, F. (1999). Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 24(1), 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D., & Cassidy, M. F. (2001). A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: Development and validation of a social capital inventory. Current Sociology, 49(2), 59–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government; How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public Sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender and Society, 18, 510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, B., Felfe, J., & Blank, H. (2007). The relationship between romance of leadership and the perception of transformational/charismatic leadership: A meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M., & Creed, D. (2002). Institutional contradictions and institutional change: A dialectic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, H., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, l–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, D. L., & Bowman-Upton, N. (1990). Female and male entrepreneurs: Psychological characteristics and their role in gender-related discrimination. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. A. (2005). Old questions and new answers about institutions: The riker objection revisited. Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/kshepsle/publications.

  • Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2008). Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 266–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. B., & Roy, R. K. (2011). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E. (2011). Entrepreneurship and the reorganization of the public sector: A gendered story. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32, 631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E., & Tillmar, M. (2008). A nurse and a civil servant changing institutions: Entrepreneurial processes in different public sector. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(2), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, S. (2005). Social capital and gender in the workplace. Journal of Management Development, 24, 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, G. (2009). The Reagan Revolution: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Gellecum, Y., Baxter, J., & Western, M. (2008). Neoliberalism, gender inequality and the Australian labour market. Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. (2003). Entrepreneurship and leadership: Common trends and common threads. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1639–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship – conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, A. (2016). Neoliberal paternalism and paradoxical subjects: Confusion and contradiction in UK activation policy. Critical Social Policy, 36(3), 412–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijen, F., & Ansari, S. (2007). Overcoming inaction through collective institutional entrepreneurship: Insights from regime theory. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1079–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. (2011). ‘Race’, Gender and Neoliberalism: Changing visual representations in development. Third World Quarterly, 32(2), 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windrum, P., & Koch, P. M. (Eds.). (2008). Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. l., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research and policy. World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cranfield University, Steventon, Abington, Oxford, UK

    Derek McAvoy

  2. Cranfield University, Graceville, QLD, Australia

    Kevin Burgess

Authors
  1. Derek McAvoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin Burgess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia

    Sujana Adapa

  2. UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia

    Alison Sheridan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McAvoy, D., Burgess, K. (2018). Female Leadership Within the Military: The Influence of Neoliberal Institutionalism. In: Adapa, S., Sheridan, A. (eds) Inclusive Leadership. Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60666-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation