Skip to main content

Comparative Evaluation of Techniques and Devices for the Removal of Fractured Instruments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In most cases fractured instruments do not present diagnostic problems, with the exception of retreatment cases where the fragment in some instances might be “hidden,” obscured by root filling material and not very clearly visible. The recognition of remaining fragments is important for treatment planning. This involves the need to choose between various acceptable nonsurgical orthograde and surgical options. Evaluating, analyzing, and comparing the performance of the techniques proposed for the management of intracanal fractured endodontic instruments are important prerequisites for the selection of the most appropriate strategy and for the prediction of the outcome. For the best modality of treatment, good clinical judgment and experience in assessing objective findings are absolutely essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Aboud LR, Ormiga F, Gomes JA. Electrochemical induced dissolution of fragments of nickel-titanium endodontic files and their removal from simulated root canals. Int Endod J. 2014;47(2):155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fouzan KS. Incidence of rotary ProFile instrument fracture and the potential for bypassing in vivo. Int Endod J. 2003;36(12):864–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alomairy KH. Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2009;35(4):559–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral CC, Ormiga F, Gomes JA. Electrochemical-induced dissolution of stainless steel files. Int Endod J. 2015;48(2):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuje J, Bargholz C, Hülsmann M. The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice. Int Endod J. 2010;43(7):545–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cvikl B, Klimscha J, Holly M, Zeitlinger M, Gruber R, Moritz A. Removal of fractured endodontic instruments using an Nd:YAG laser. Quintessence Int. 2014;45:569–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebihara A, Takashina M, Anjo T, Takeda A, Suda H. Removal of root canal obstructions using pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Int Cong Ser. 2003;1248:257–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman G, Solomon C, Notaro P, Moskowitz E. Retrieving broken endodontic instruments. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;88(3):588–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fors UG, Berg JO. A method for the removal of broken endodontic instruments from root canals. J Endod. 1983;9(4):156–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman S, Stabholz A, Tamse A. Endodontic retreatment–case selection and technique. 3. Retreatment techniques. J Endod. 1990;16(11):543–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu M, Zhang Z, Hou B. Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome. J Endod. 2011;37(5):619–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gencoglu N, Helvacioglu D. Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems. Eur J Dent. 2009;3(2):90–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gettleman BH, Spriggs KA, ElDeeb ME, Messer HH. Removal of canal obstructions with the Endo Extractor. J Endod. 1991;17(12):608–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman LI. Endodontic case reports. Dent Clin N Am. 1974;18(2):509–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara R, Suehara M, Fujii R, Kato H, Nakagawa K, Oda Y. Laser welding method for removal of instruments debris from root canals. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2013;54:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan M. Success rates in removal of fractured instruments using ultrasonics or the EndoRescue-Kit: an in vitro study on extracted teeth. Master Thesis, Düsseldorf Dental Academy (DDA); 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann M. Removal of silver cones and fractured instruments using the Canal Finder System. J Endod. 1990a;16(12):596–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann M. [Removal of fractured root canal instruments using the Canal Finder System]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1990b;45(4):229–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann M. Methods for removing metal obstructions from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1993;9(6):223–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann M, Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(6):252–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ketterl W. Instrumentenfraktur im Wurzelkanal. Munich: Hanser; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough AJ. Opinions and attitudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intra-canal fracture of endodontic instruments. Part 2. Int Endod J. 2008;41(12):1079–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell Q, Jeansonne BG, Stoute D, Lallier TE. Electrochemical dissolution of nickel-titanium endodontic files induces periodontal ligament cell death. J Endod. 2013;39(5):679–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molyvdas I, Lambrianidis T, Zervas P, Veis A. Clinical study on the prognosis of endodontic treatment of teeth with broken endodontic instruments. Stoma. 1992;20:63–72. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagai O, Tani N, Kayaba Y, Kodama S, Osada T. Ultrasonic removal of broken instruments in root canals. Int Endod J. 1986;19(6):298–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nehme W. A new approach for the retrieval of broken instruments. J Endod. 1999;25(9):633–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nevares G, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML, Bueno CE. Success rates for removing or bypassing fractured instruments: a prospective clinical study. J Endod. 2012;38(4):442–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okiji T. Modified usage of the Masserann kit for removing intracanal broken instruments. J Endod. 2003;29(7):466–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ormiga F, da Cunha Ponciano Gomes JA, de Araujo MC. Dissolution of nickel-titanium endodontic files via an electrochemical process: a new concept for future retrieval of fractured files in root canals. J Endod. 2010;36(4):717–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ormiga F, Aboud LR, Gomes JA. Electrochemical-induced dissolution of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments with different designs. Int Endod J. 2015;48(4):342–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pai AR, Kamath MP, Basnet P. Retrieval of a separated file using Masserann technique: a case report. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2006;4(2):238–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi M, Parashos P. A novel technique for the removal of fractured instruments in the apical third of curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2009;42(3):264–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod. 2004;30(12):827–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sano S, Miyake K, Osada T. A clinical study on the removal of the broken instrument in the root canal using Masserann Kit. Kanagawashigaku. 1974;9(1):50–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahabinejad H, Ghassemi A, Pishbin L, Shahravan A. Success of ultrasonic technique in removing fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals and its effect on the required force for root fracture. J Endod. 2013;39(6):824–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98(5):605–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiyakov K, Vasileva R. Success for removing or bypassing instruments fractured beyond the root canal curve-45 clinical cases. In: Journal of IMAB – Annual Proceeding; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyttner B. Endodontic instrument separations. Evaluation of a patient cases series with separated endodontic instruments and factors related to the treatment regarding separated instruments. Master of Medical Science in Odontology, Karolinska Institute for Odontology; 2007. p. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souter NJ, Messer HH. Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique. J Endod. 2005;31(6):450–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stasinopoulos E. Dental pathology and therapeutics, Vol. II: Therapeutics. Athens: Parisianos; 1978. p. 212–5. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter B, Lussi A, Sequeira P. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals. Int Endod J. 2005;38(2):112–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terauchi Y. Separated file removal. Dent Today. 2012;31(5):108, 110–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terauchi Y, O’Leary L, Suda H. Removal of separated files from root canals with a new file-removal system: case reports. J Endod. 2006;32(8):789–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terauchi Y, O’Leary L, Kikuchi I, Asanagi M, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, et al. Evaluation of the efficiency of a new file removal system in comparison with two conventional systems. J Endod. 2007;33(5):585–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tzanetakis GN, Kontakiotis EG, Maurikou DV, Marzelou MP. Prevalence and management of instrument fracture in the postgraduate endodontic program at the Dental School of Athens: a five-year retrospective clinical study. J Endod. 2008;34(6):675–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J Endod. 2003a;29(11):756–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases. J Endod. 2003b;29(11):764–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wefelmeier M, Eveslage M, Burklein S, Ott K, Kaup M. Removing fractured endodontic instruments with a modified tube technique using a light-curing composite. J Endod. 2015;41(5):733–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wei X, Ling JQ, Gao Y, Huang XY, Li XX. [Management of intracanal separated instruments with the microsonic technique and its clinical outcome]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004;39(5):379–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth P, Cuocolo D, Vandrangi P, Sigurdsson A. Effectiveness of the GentleWave System in Removing Separated Instruments. J Endod. 2015;41(11):1895–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoldas O, Oztunc H, Tinaz C, Alparslan N. Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97(4):513–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu DG, Kimura Y, Tomita Y, Nakamura Y, Watanabe H, Matsumoto K. Study on removal effects of filling materials and broken files from root canals using pulsed Nd:YAG laser. J Clin Med Surg. 2000;18:23–8.r

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodor Lambrianidis D.D.S., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hülsmann, M., Lambrianidis, T. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Techniques and Devices for the Removal of Fractured Instruments. In: Lambrianidis, T. (eds) Management of Fractured Endodontic Instruments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60651-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60651-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60650-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60651-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics