Skip to main content

Cognitive Processes and PEMs of TSA in Digitized MCRs of NPPs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1510 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 589))

Abstract

In order to identified macro-cognitive processes and psychological error mechanisms (PEMs) of TSA in digital NPPs. Firstly, the components of TSA are identified according to team task analysis, which including individual situation awareness (ISA), shared situation awareness (SSA) and mutual awareness (MA). Furthermore, the macro-cognitive processes of TSA are identified respectively from ISA, SSA and MA on the basis of simulation experiments, and the process model of TSA is established to illustrate the forming mechanism of TSA. Finally, the PEMs of TSA errors are identified, it is very useful to prevent and reduce TSA errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Salas, E., Fiore, S.M.: Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance. American Psychological Association, Washington DC (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Banbury, S., Tremblay, S.: A Cognitive Approach to Situation Awareness: Theory and Application. Routledge, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, S.K., Park, J.Y., Byun, S.N.: Crew resource management training for improving team performance of operators in Korean advanced nuclear power plant. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, vol. 44, pp. 2055–2059. IEEE Press, Hong Kong (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salas, E., Muniz, E.J., Prince, C.: Situation awareness in teams. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors. Taylor & Francis Ltd, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, P.D., et al.: Situation awareness in team performance: implications for measurement and training. Hum. Factors 37(1), 123–136 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salmon, P.M., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., et al.: What really is going on? review of situation awareness model for individuals and Teams. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 9(4), 297–323 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuan, X.H.: Effects of Mutual Awareness on Team Performance in Accident Diagnosis under Computerized Working Environment. Tsinghua University, Beijing (2013). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37, 32–64 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, P.C., Zhang, L., Dai, L.C., et al.: Study on operator’s SA reliability in digital NPPs. Part 1: The analysis method of operator’s errors of situation awareness. Ann. Nucl. Energy 102, 168–178 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, D.G., Endsley, M.R.: Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 67, 507–512 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Letsky, M., Warner, N., Fiore, S.M., et al.: Macrocognition in complex team problem solving. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (12th ICCRTS), Newport, pp. 19–21 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whaley, A.M., Xing, J., Boring, R.L., et al.: Building a Psychological Foundation for Human Reliability Analysis, NUREG-2114. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington D.C (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, G., Wiggins, S., Dominguez, C.O.: Team sensemaking. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 11(4), 304–320 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Connor, P., O’Dea, A., Flin, R., et al.: Identifying the team skills required by nuclear power plant operations personnel. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 38(11), 1028–1037 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fiore, S.M., Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Salas, E., et al.: Towards an understanding of macrocognition in teams: developing and defining complex collaborative processes and products. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 11(4), 250–271 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McComb, S., Kennedy, D., Perryman, R., et al.: Temporal patterns of mental model convergence: implications for distributed teams interacting in electronic collaboration spaces. Hum. Factors 4, 264–281 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Foulger, D.: Models of the Communication Process (2004). http://davis.foulger.info/research/unifiedModelOfCommunication.htm

  18. Shu, Y., Furuta, K.: An inference method of team situation awareness based on mutual awareness. Cogn. Technol. Work 7, 272–287 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 11, 411–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, M., Johnson, T., Lee, Y., et al.: The Conceptual Framework of Factors Affecting Shared Mental Model, pp. 561–565. Association for Educational Communications & Technology (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G., Banbury, S., et al.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 4th edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shorrock, S., Kirwan, B.: Development and application of a human error identification tool for air traffic control. Appl. Ergon. 33(4), 319–336 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kirwan, B.: Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high risk systems-Part 2: towards a frame work approach. Appl. Ergon. 29, 299–318 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirwan, B.: A Guide To Practical Human Reliability Assessment. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, J.J., Paterl, V.L., Johnson, T.R., et al.: A cognitive taxonomy of medical errors. J. Biomed. Inform. 37, 193–204 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support by Natural Science Foundation of China (71371070, 71301069, 51674145) and Scientific Research Program supported by Lingdong Nuclear Power Plant (KR70543), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2016M600633), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2017-260), the Humanities and Social Science Projects of Ministry of Education (11YJC630207), Program of China Scholarship Council (CSC) and the Social Science Projects of Hunan Province (16YBA314) are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pengcheng Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, P., Dai, L., Zhang, L., Jiang, Y., Li, X. (2018). Cognitive Processes and PEMs of TSA in Digitized MCRs of NPPs. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 589. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60644-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60645-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics