Skip to main content

A Framework for Understanding Operator Decision Making in Simulated Nuclear Power Plant Cyber Attacks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 589))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1499 Accesses

Abstract

Malicious cyber-attacks are becoming increasingly prominent due to the advance of technology and methods over the last decade. These attacks have the potential to bring down critical infrastructures, such as nuclear power plants (NPP’s), which are so vital to the country that their incapacitation would have debilitating effects on national security, public health, or safety. Despite the devastating effects a cyber-attack could have on NPP’s, there is a lack of understanding as to the effects on the plant from a discreet failure or surreptitious sabotage of components and a lack of knowledge in how the control room operators would react to such a situation. In this project, the authors are collaborating with NPP operators to discern the impact of cyber-attacks on control room operations and lay out a framework to better understand the control room operators’ tasks and decision points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lloyd’s: Business Blackout: The Insurance Implications of a Cyber Attack on the US Power Grid. Emerging Risk Report (2015). https://www.lloyds.com/news-and-insight/risk-insight/library/society-and-security/business-blackout

  2. Stevens-Adams, S., Cole, K., Haass, M., Warrender, C., Jeffers, R., Burnham, L., Forsythe, C.: Situation awareness and automation in the electric grid control room. Procedia Manufact. 3, 5277–5284 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Voss, J.F., Greene, T.R., Post, T.A., Penner, B.C.: Problem-solving skills in the social sciences. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, vol. 17, pp. 165–213. Academic, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Militello, L.G., Hutton, R.J.B.: Applied cognitive task analysis: a practitioner’s toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. Ergonomics 41(11), 1618–1641 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Klein, G.A., Calderwood, R., MacGreggor, D.: Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 19(3), 462–472 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., Wang, Y.: Expertise in a complex skill: diagnosing X-ray pictures. In: Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., Farr, M.J. (eds.), The Nature of Expertise, pp. 311–342. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Woods, N.N.: Science is fundamental: The role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med. Educ. 41(12), 1173–1177 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Feltovich, P.J., Barrows, H.S.: Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In: Schmidt, H.G., de Volder, M.L. (eds.) Tutorials in Problem-Based Learning, pp. 128–142. Van Gorcum, Maastricht (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glenberg, A.M., Epstein, W.: Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Mem. Cogn. 15, 84–93 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffman, R.R., Trafton, G., Roebber, P.: Minding the Weather. How Expert Forecasters Think. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ericsson, K.A.: The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, pp. 685–705 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. J. Learn. Sci. 4(2), 167–207 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lester, S.: Novice to expert: the dreyfus model of skill acquisition (2005). http://devmts.org.uk/dreyfus.pdf. Adapted from Dreyfus, S.E.: Formal models vs. human situational understanding: inherent limitations on the modeling of business expertise, USAF, Office of Scientific Research, Report ORC-81-3 (1981). http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a097468.pdf

  14. Ericsson, K.A.: The search for general abilities and basic capacities. In: The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise, pp. 93–125 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss, D.J., Shanteau, J.: Empirical assessment of expertise. Hum. Fact. 45(1), 104–116 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jipp, M.: Expertise development with different types of automation: a function of different cognitive abilities. Hum. Fact. 58(1), 92–106 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Camerer, C.F., Johnson, E.J.: The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: how can the experts know so much and predict so badly? In: Ericsson K.A., Smith, J. (eds.) Towards a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits, pp. 195–217. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991). https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/mygsb/faculty/research/pubfiles/1152/Process_and_performance_of_experts.pdf

  18. Shanteau, J., Stewart, T.R.: Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and comments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 53, 95–106 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shanteau, J., Weiss, D.J., Thomas, R.P., Pounds, J.C.: Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 136(2), 253–263 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ericsson, K.A., Smith, J.: Prospects and limits of empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In: Ericsson, K.A., Smith, J. (eds.) Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits, pp. 1–38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vicente, K.J., Wang, J.H.: An ecological theory of expertise effects in memory recall. Psychol. Rev. 1(105), 33–57 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., Tesch-Romer, C.: The role of deliberate practice in acquisition of expert performance. Psychol. Rev. 100, 363–406 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000, SAND2017-2674 C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Adams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Adams, S., Hendrickson, S., Turner, P. (2018). A Framework for Understanding Operator Decision Making in Simulated Nuclear Power Plant Cyber Attacks. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 589. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60644-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60645-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics