Skip to main content

Predicting Stimulus-Driven Attentional Selection Within Mobile Interfaces

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC,volume 586)

Abstract

Masciocchi and Still [1] suggested that biologically inspired computational saliency models could predict attentional deployment within webpages. Their stimuli were presented on a large desktop monitor. We explored whether a saliency model’s predictive performance can be applied to small mobile interface displays. We asked participants to free-view screenshots of NASA’s mobile application Playbook. The Itti et al. [2] saliency model was employed to produce the predictive stimulus-driven maps. The first six fixations were used to select values to form the saliency maps’ bins, which formed the observed distribution. This was compared to the shuffled distribution, which offers a very conservative chance comparison as it includes predictable spatial biases by using a within-subjects bootstrapping technique. The observed distribution values were higher than the shuffled distribution. This suggests that a saliency model was able to predict the deployment of attention within small mobile application interfaces.

Keywords

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Mobile interface
  • Cognitive engineering
  • Saliency model
  • Visual search

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_24
  • Chapter length: 7 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-60642-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

References

  1. Masciocchi, C.M., Still, J.D.: Alternative to eye tracking for predicting stimulus-driven attentional selection within interfaces. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 34, 285–301 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Itti, L., Koch, C., Niebur, E.: A model of saliency-based fast visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 1254–1259 (1998)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Theeuwes, J.: Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 65–70 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfe, J.M.: Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress with a Model of Visual Search. In: Gray, W. (eds.) Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems, pp. 99–119, New York, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Theeuwes, J.: Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Percept. Psychophys. 51, 599–606 (1992)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., Niebur, E.: Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vis. Res. 42, 107–123 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Still, J.D., Masciocchi, C.M.: A saliency model predicts fixations in web interfaces. In: 5th International Workshop on Model Driven Development of Advanced User Interfaces Computer-Human Interaction Conference, pp. 25–29 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, M., Marsden, G., Mohd-Nasir, N., Boone, K., Buchanan, G.: Improving web interaction on small displays. J. Comput. Netw. 31, 1129–1137 (1999)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Christie, J., Klein, R.M., Watters, C.: A comparison of simple hierarchy and grid metaphor for option layouts on small-size screens. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 60, 564–584 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A., de-Marcos, L.: An experiment with content distribution methods in touchscreen mobile devices. J. Appl. Ergon. 50, 79–85 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim, J.J., Feria, C.: Visual search on a mobile device while walking. In: Mobile HCI Conference, pp. 295–304, San Francisco, CA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Watters, C., Duffy, J., Duffy, K.: Using large tables on small display devices. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 58, 21–37 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Marquez, J.J., Pyrzak, G., Hashemi, S., Ahmed, S., McMillin, K., Medwid, J., Chen, D., Esten, H.: Supporting real-time operations and execution through timeline and scheduling aids. In: 43rd International Conference on Environmental Systems, pp. 1–11. ICES (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harel, J., Koch, C., Perona, P.: Graph-based visual saliency. In: NIPS, vol. 1, pp. 5–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenholtz, R., Dorai, A., Freeman, R.: Do predictions of visual perception aid design? ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 8, 1–20 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Steven Hillenius for providing access to the Playbook software through a demo site. In addition, we thank the Virginia Space Grant Consortium for financially supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremiah D. Still .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Still, J.D., Hicks, J., Cain, A., Billman, D. (2018). Predicting Stimulus-Driven Attentional Selection Within Mobile Interfaces. In: Baldwin, C. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 586. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60641-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60642-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)