Skip to main content

Regulation as Global Drug Governance: How New Is the NPS Phenomenon?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Novel Psychoactive Substances

Abstract

This work focuses on the lessons of efforts to internationalise prohibitions and regulation over the last century and what these mean for contemporary control efforts around novel psychoactive substances (NPS). In particular it will focus on the system of ‘scheduling’ and how it might be affected by the rapid emergence of NPS. The former was designed as a reactive system of commodity regulation, where the key substances had medical use and therefore required a global trading arranging to minimise the negative externalities from their production and use. It examines the key tenets of the global regulatory system and how they emerged in response to perceived key global issues and the emergence of new narcotic and psychotropic substances. It thereby seeks to determine the continued relevance of the global drug regulatory system to the issue of NPS and how it may evolve in response to the rapid proliferation of these substances. Ultimately, it concludes that the NPS phenomenon will merely accelerate shifts already underway within the system, towards a greater role for national regulatory decisions, an expansion of regulatory experimentation and options and a more general recourse to the principle of ‘policy pluralism’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This was not the case for Group II since the PCOB only received yearly statistics, and it was only for that year the PCOB was authorised to impose an embargo.

  2. 2.

    “A medicine prepared by extracting one or more active constituents of a plant” (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/galenical).

References

  • Bewley-Taylor DR (2012) International drug control: consensus fractured. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brownfield WR (2014) Trends in global drug policy. New York City, October 9, 2014. http://fpc.state.gov/232813.htm

  • Collins J (2014) The economics of a new global strategy. In: Collins J (ed) Ending the drug wars: report of the LSE expert group on the economics of drug policy. LSE IDEAS, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins J (2015) Regulations and prohibitions: Anglo-American relations and international drug control, 1939–1964. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins J (2017) Rethinking “flexibilities” in the international drug control system – potential, precedents and models for reforms. Int J Drug Policy, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 (1971) United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • EMCDDA (2015) New psychoactive substances in Europe: an update from the EU Early Warning System, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayle D (2015) Psychoactive substances ban will “end brain research” in Britain, experts warn. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/29/psychoactive-substances-ban-end-brain-research-britain-david-nutt. Accessed 17 Mar 2017

  • Gimenez Corte C (2010) The forms of international institutional law: an historical analysis of the scheduling decisions of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances taken by the United Nations’ commission on narcotics drugs. Int Organ Law Rev 7:171–221. doi:10.1163/157237310X523786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman MAR, Ziskind JA (2014) Lawful access to cannabis: gains, losses and design criteria. In: Collins J (ed) Ending the drug wars: report of the LSE expert group on the economics of drug policy. The London School of Economics and Political Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister WB (2004) The global political economy of scheduling: the international–historical context of the controlled substances act. Drug Alcohol Depend 76:3–8. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister WB (2012) Reflections on a century of international drug control. Gov Glob Drug Wars, LSE IDEAS special reports 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer K, Parssinen TM (2002) Webs of smoke: smugglers, warlords, spies, and the history of the international drug trade. Rowman & Littlefield, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills JH (2014) Cocaine and the British empire: the drug and the diplomats at the Hague opium conference, 1911–12. J Imp Commonw Hist 42:400–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol (1961) United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane J, Mcallister WB (2003) Keeping the lid on: a century of drug regulation and control. Drug Alcohol Depend 70:S5–S12. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00096-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH (1969) American diplomacy and the narcotics traffic, 1900–1939: a study in international humanitarian reform. Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoumi FE (2016) Re-examining the “medical and scientific” basis for interpreting the drug treaties: does the “regime” have any clothes? In: Collins J (ed) After the drug wars: report of the LSE expert group on the economics of drug policy. LSE IDEAS, London

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1973) Commentary on the single convention on narcotic drugs, 1961. United Nations Secretariat, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1976) Commentary on the convention on psychotropic substances, 1971. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1998) Commentary on the United Nations convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances 1988. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (1988) United Nations, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • UNODC (2008) A century of international drug control. United Nations, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence (1968) Sixteenth report (no. 407), WHO technical report series. WHO

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence (n.d.) Seventeenth report, WHO technical report series

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Collins Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collins, J. (2017). Regulation as Global Drug Governance: How New Is the NPS Phenomenon?. In: Corazza, O., Roman-Urrestarazu, A. (eds) Novel Psychoactive Substances. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60600-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60600-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60599-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60600-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics