Skip to main content

Modeling Operator Workload for the Resource Prospector Lunar Rover Mission

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Human Factors in Simulation and Modeling (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 591))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

NASA’s Resource Prospector mission is an unmanned lunar exploration mission currently in the concept development stage. Early tests have shown that the unique mission characteristics may combine to create the potential for very high workload for operators. This paper applies a taxonomy of workload drivers to identify the contextual variables expected to contribute to operator workload during the mission. Specifically, workload drivers attributed to the environment, task demands, equipment, and operator characteristics are reviewed. This research is intended to support the development of predictive models of operator workload to support the design and evaluation of workload countermeasures for the mission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andrews, D., Colaprete, A., Quinn, J., Bluethmann, B., Trimble, J.: Resource Prospector (RP) - early prototyping and development. In: AIAA Space 2015, Pasadena, CA, pp. 779–793 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pedersen, L., Han, C.S., Vitus, M.: Dark navigation: sensing and rover navigation in permanently shadowed lunar craters. In: 9th i-SAIRAS, Los Angeles, CA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Trimble, J., Carvalho, R.: Lunar prospecting: searching for volatiles at the south pole. In: SpaceOps 2016 Conference, Daejeon, Korea, pp. 2272–2280 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trimble, J., Shirley, M.H., Hobart, S.G.: Agile: from software to mission system. In: SpaceOps 2016, Daejeon, Korea, pp. 1012–1019 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshida, K., Wilcox, B.: Space robots and systems. In: Khatib, O., Siciliano, B. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1031–1063. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gingras, D.: Deployment of the CSA Teleoperation Robotic Testbed 2 at Rougemont Sand Quarry. Test report, Canadian Space Agency (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hart, S.G.: NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of HFES, Los Angeles, CA, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 904–908 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hooey, B.L., Kaber, D.B., Adams, J.A., Fong, T., Gore, B.F.: The Underpinnings of Workload in Unmanned Vehicle Systems. IEEE Trans. Human–Mach. Syst. (2018, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vertesi, J.: Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, D., Peterson, T., Vincenzi, D., Doherty, S.: Effect of time pressure and target uncertainty on human operator performance and workload for autonomous unmanned aerial systems. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 51, 52–58 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. da Silva, F., Scott, S., Cummings, M.: Design methodology for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) team coordination. Technical report HAL2007-04, MIT (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGovern, D.E.: Experience and results in teleoperation of land vehicles. In: Ellis, S. (ed.) Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments, pp. 182–195. Taylor and Francis, Bristol (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McGovern, D.E.: Human interfaces in remote driving. Technical report SAND88-0562, Sandia National Laboratory (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pastore, T.H.: Improved operator awareness of teleoperated land vehicle attitude. Technical report NRAD-TR-1659, Naval Command, Control, and Ocean Surveillance Center, San Diego, CA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, J.Y.C., Durlach, P.J., Sloan, J.A., Bowens, L.D.: Robotic operator performance in simulated reconnaissance missions. Technical report ARL-TR-3628, Hum. Res. Eng. Dir., Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Voshell, M.G., Woods, D.D.: Breaking the keyhole in human–robot coordination: method and evaluation. In: Proceedings of HFES, vol. 49, pp. 442–446, Orlando, FL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCarley, J.S., Wickens, C.D.: Human factors concerns in UAV flight. Technical report AHFD-05-05/FAA-05-01, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Institute of Aviation, Savoy, IL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, J.Y.C., Haas, E.C., Barnes, M.J.: Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.-C: Appl. 37(6), 1231–1245 (2007). IEEE Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. French, J., Ghirardelli, T.G., Swoboda, J.: The effect of bandwidth on operator control of an unmanned ground vehicle. In: Proceedings of the I/ITSEC, Orlando, FL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, J.Y.C., Barnes, M.J.: Human-agent teaming for multirobot control: a review of human factors issues. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 44(1), 13–29 (2014). IEEE Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kress, G., Almaula, H.: Sensorimotor requirements for teleoperation. Report R-6279, FMC Corporation, Santa Clara, CA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Szalma, J.L.: Individual differences in human-technology interaction: incorporating variation in human characteristics into human factors and ergonomics research and design. Theoret. Issues Ergon. Sci. 10(5), 381–397 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lathan, C.E., Tracey, M.: The effect of operator spatial perception and sensory feedback on human-robot teleoperation performance. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 11(4), 368–377 (2002). MIT Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodes, W., Gugerty, L.: Effects of electronic map displays and individual differences in ability on navigation performance. Hum. Factors 54(4), 589–599 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baber, C., Morin, C., Parekh, M., Cahillane, M., Houghton, R.J.: Multimodal control of sensors on multiple simulated unmanned vehicles. Ergonomics 54(9), 792–805 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, J.Y.C.: Concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks and effects of cueing in a simulated multi-tasking environment. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 18(1), 1–15 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gore, B.F., Hooey, B.L., Haan, N., Bakowski, D.L., Mahlstedt, E.: A methodical approach for developing valid human performance models of flight deck operations. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) 14th Annual Human Centered Design Conference, pp. 379–388. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Gore, B.F.: Workload as a performance shaping factor for human performance models. In: 20th BRIMS, Sundance, UT (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the members of the Resource Prospector mission team who have shared their insights and experiences including Mark Allan, Matt Deans, Michael Furlong, Mark Shirley, and Vinh To. Also, we would like to thank Mark Micire, Eric Krotkov, and John Paschkewitz for motivating and encouraging this study as part of an effort to model and predict workload in human-machine systems.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Becky L. Hooey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hooey, B.L., Toy, J.J.N.T., Carvalho, R.E., Fong, T., Gore, B.F. (2018). Modeling Operator Workload for the Resource Prospector Lunar Rover Mission. In: Cassenti, D. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Simulation and Modeling. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 591. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60591-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60591-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60590-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60591-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics