Skip to main content

The Effect of Font Type on Character Legibility for Different Age Groups

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 3841 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 588))

Abstract

The readability of 8 popular English fonts and 9 Chinese font types were studied in this study. The reaction time (RT/ms) and the legibility correctness (RC/%) were recorded in the experiment while the information transmission rate (ITR for short) were calculated from RT and RC. Two aged groups of subjects participated in the experiment, and it was found that the font recognition task performance of the youth group was better than that of the middle aged group. The legibility of sans serif English font was better than the serifs. However, the effect of sans serif fonts could not be found with the Chinese characters. At last, bold art font was the most difficult for reading and should be avoided for important information display interfaces. The results of our study could give some suggestions to the design of human machine interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Banerjee, J., Majumdar, D.: Readability, subjective preference and mental workload studies on young Indian adults for selection of optimum font type and size during onscreen reading. Al Ameen J. Med. Sci. 04, 131–143 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard, M., Liao, C.H., Mills, M.: The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. In: ACM/SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 175–176 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard, M., Lida, B., Riley, S., et al.: A comparison of popular online fonts: which size and type is best? Usability News (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Franken, G., Podlesek, A., Možina, K.: Eye-tracking study of reading speed from LCD displays: influence of type style and type size. J. Eye Mov. Res. 8 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kai, K., Wehlitz, T., Knobelsdorff, S.V., et al.: A matter of font type: the effect of serifs on the evaluation of scientific abstracts. Int. J. Psychol. 50, 372 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kong, Y.K., Lee, I., Jung, M.C., et al.: The effects of age, viewing distance, display type, font type, colour contrast and number of syllables on the legibility of Korean characters. Ergonomics 54, 453–465 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lange, R.W.D., Esterhuizen, H.L., Beatty, D.: Performance differences between Times and Helvetica in a reading task. Electron. Publ. 6, 213–217 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moret-Tatay, C., Perea, M.: Do serifs provide an advantage in the recognition of written words? J. Cogn. Psychol. 23, 619–624 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y., Shao, Z.: Stroke frequency and font effects on Chinese character recognition threshold. Psychol. Sci. 32, 134–136 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, L.N., Zhang, X.M., Chen, X.Y.: The legibility research of chinese font and font structure. Chin. J. Ergon. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gong, Y., Zhang, S.Y., Liu, Z.F., et al.: An eye movement study on the effect of color on visual search efficiency. J. Zhejiang Univ. 50, 1987–1994 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guan, Y.J., Fang, F.X.: New progress in the research of Chinese character recognition. J. Adv. Psychol. Sci. 18, 1–6 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. King, W.X., Zhu, Z.X., Shen, M.W.: The influence of Chinese characters on the interpretation. Appl. Psychol. 8–11 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ouyang, L.S., Li, S.S., Yuan, S.: The study of “sans serif font” under “visual information design”. J. Hubei Inst. Fine Arts 16–21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Su, P.: Outline of Modern Chinese Characters. Peking University Press, Beijing (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, B.L., Cao, H.Y.: A new stroke effect in the recognition of Chinese characters—on the frequency effects. J. Psychol. 24, 10–16 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, A.B., Zhang, X.M., Shu, H.: The influence of font, font size and part of speech on Chinese character cognitive processing. Appl. Psychol. 11, 128–132 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kronegg J., Voloshynovskyy S., Pun, T.: Information-transfer rate modeling of EEG-based synchronized brain-computer interfaces (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Woods, R.J., Davis, K., Scharff, L.F.V.: Effects of typeface and font size on legibility for children. Am. J. Psychol. Res. 1, 86–102 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by science and technology support program 2014BAK01B01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunqian Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, Y., Ding, L., Ran, L., Li, Y. (2018). The Effect of Font Type on Character Legibility for Different Age Groups. In: Rebelo, F., Soares, M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 588. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60581-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60582-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics