Skip to main content

Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology

Abstract

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) was introduced in 2008 as one of three “indeterminate” (not clearly benign or malignant) diagnostic reporting categories for thyroid fine needle aspirations. The two terms are alternatives and equally acceptable; it is not recommended that both be used by a laboratory to imply distinctly different interpretations. Each of the indeterminate categories has an elevated risk of malignancy (ROM) compared to a benign aspirate. The AUS/FLUS category is reserved for cases with atypia, cytologic and/or architectural in nature, that is insufficient for either of the other two indeterminate categories. Of the three indeterminate categories, AUS/FLUS has the lowest ROM, meriting its distinction from the other two. Follow-up studies since the introduction of the AUS/FLUS category indicate a ROM that is higher than predicted initially (~10–30% rather than ~5–15%). Furthermore, the risk differs according to the nature of the atypia prompting the AUS/FLUS interpretation. Specifically, AUS/FLUS with cytologic atypia raising concern for papillary carcinoma has a higher ROM than AUS/FLUS associated with architectural atypia alone or Hürthle cells. The introduction of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) terminology in 2016 will decrease the overall ROM for AUS/FLUS. The clinical approach to a nodule with an initial AUS/FLUS interpretation is a repeat FNA or molecular testing, although patient preference and clinical risk factors may also impact management.

Based on published experience with AUS/FLUS in clinical practice, this update:

  1. (a)

    Details the appropriate use of the AUS/FLUS diagnostic terminology

  2. (b)

    Describes subclassification for the most common AUS/FLUS patterns to improve communication between cytologists and clinicians and to allow further refinement of the category as the impact of new information and entities (i.e., NIFTP) are further defined

  3. (c)

    Updates the management of AUS/FLUS, including the use of molecular testing

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ali SZ, Cibas ES. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Definitions, criteria and explanatory notes. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Iskandar ME, Bonomo G, Avadhani V, Persky M, Lucido D, Wang B, Marti JL. Evidence for overestimation of the prevalence of malignancy in indeterminate thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III. Surgery. 2015;157:510–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Straccia P, Rossi ED, Bizzarro T, Brunelli C, Cianfrini F, et al. A meta-analytic review of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: has the rate of malignancy in indeterminate lesions been underestimated? Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123:713–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheffield BS, Masoudi H, Walker B, Wiseman SM. Preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2014;9:97–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, Mazzucchelli L, Baloch ZW. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol. 2012;56:333–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. VanderLaan PA, Marqusee E, Krane JF. Usefulness of diagnostic qualifiers for thyroid fine-needle aspirations with atypia of undetermined significance. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:572–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Renshaw AA. Subclassification of atypical cells of undetermined significance in direct smears of fine-needle aspirations of the thyroid: distinct patterns and associated risk of malignancy. Cancer Cytopathol. 2011;119:322–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu HH, Inman A, Cramer HM. Subclassification of “atypia of undetermined significance” in thyroid fine-needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42:23–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh RS, Wang HH. Eliminating the “atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance” category from the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:896–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horne MJ, Chhieng DC, Theoharis C, et al. Thyroid follicular lesion of undetermined significance: evaluation of the risk of malignancy using the two-tier sub-classification. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40:410–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Olson MT, Clark DP, Erozan YS, et al. Spectrum of risk of malignancy in subcategories of “atypia of undetermined significance”. Acta Cytol. 2011;55:518–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen JC, Pace SC, Khiyami A, McHenry CR. Should atypia of undetermined significance be subclassified to better estimate risk of thyroid cancer? Am J Surg. 2014;207:331–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luu MH, Fischer AH, Stockl TJ, Pisharodi L, Owens CL. Atypical follicular cells with equivocal features of papillary thyroid carcinoma is not a low-risk cytologic diagnosis. Acta Cytol. 2011;55:526–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nishino M, Wang HH. Should the thyroid AUS/FLUS category be further stratified by malignancy risk? Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:481–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikiforov YE, Seethala RR, Tallini G, et al. Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1023–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Strickland KC, Howitt BE, Marqusee E, et al. The impact of noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma on rates of malignancy for fine-needle aspiration diagnostic categories. Thyroid. 2015;25:987–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Faquin WC, Wong LQ, Afrogheh AH, et al. Impact of reclassifying noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma on the risk of malignancy in the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;124:181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cibas ES, Baloch ZW, Fellegara G, LiVolsi VA, Raab SS, Rosai J, Diggans J, Friedman L, Kennedy GC, Kloos RT, Lanman RB, Mandel SJ, Sindy N, Steward DL, Zeiger MA, Haugen BR, Alexander EK. A prospective assessment defining the limitations of thyroid nodule pathologic evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:325–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Henry M. The potential for overuse of atypical thyroid diagnoses. Cancer Cytopathol. 2012;120(2):108–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. VanderLaan PA, Renshaw AA, Krane JF. Atypia of undetermined significance and nondiagnostic rates in the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology are inversely related. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137(3):462–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seningen JL, Nassar A, Henry MR. Correlation of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology with corresponding histology at Mayo Clinic, 2001–2007: an institutional experience of 1,945 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40(Suppl 1):E27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faquin WC, Cibas ES, Renshaw AA. “Atypical” cells in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens of benign thyroid cysts. Cancer Cytopathol. 2005;105(2):71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Renshaw AA. Histiocytoid cells in fine needle aspirates of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: frequency and significance of an under-recognized cytologic pattern. Cancer Cytopathol. 2002;96:240–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harshan M, Crapanzano JP, Aslan DL, Vazquez MF, Saqi A. Papillary thyroid carcinoma with atypical histiocytoid cells on fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37(4):244–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang GC, Stern CM, Messina AV. Cystic papillary thyroid carcinoma in fine needle aspiration may represent a subset of the encapsulated variant in WHO classification. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38(10):721–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ellison E, Lapuerta P, Martin SE. Psammoma bodies in fine-needle aspirates of the thyroid: predictive value for papillary carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol. 1998;84(3):169–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krane JF, VanderLaan PA, Faquin WC, Renshaw AA. The AUS:M ratio: a proposed performance measure for reporting in the Bethesda system for thyroid cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2012;120:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pusztaszeri MP, Krane JF, Cibas ES, Daniels G, Faquin WC. FNAB of benign thyroid nodules with papillary hyperplasia: a cytological and histological evaluation. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:666–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Absher KJ, Truong LD, Khurana KK, Ramzy I. Parathyroid cytology: avoiding diagnostic pitfalls. Head Neck. 2002;24(2):157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu F, Gnepp DR, Pisharodi LR. Fine needle aspiration of parathyroid lesions. Acta Cytol. 2004;48(2):133–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Layfield LJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cystic parathyroid lesions. A cytomorphologic overlap with cystic lesions of the thyroid. Acta Cytol. 1991;35(4):447–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tseng FY, Hsiao YL, Chang TC. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of parathyroid lesions. A review of 72 cases. Acta Cytol. 2002;46(6):1029–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kloos RT. Molecular profiling of thyroid nodules: current role for the Afirma gene expression classifier on clinical decision making. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2017;26(Suppl 1):36–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Domingo R, Ogden L, Been L, Kennedy G, Traweek T. Cytologic and molecular identification of parathyroid tissue in thyroid nodule fine needle aspiration biopsies. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2016;5(5):S81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nikiforov YE, Carty SE, Chiosea SI, Coyne C, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Gooding WE, LeBeau SO, Ohori NP, Seethala RR, Tublin ME, Yip L, Nikiforova MN. Impact of the multi-gene ThyroSeq next-generation sequencing assay on cancer diagnosis in thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology. Thyroid. 2015;25(11):1217–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Roh MH, Jo VY, Stelow EB, Faquin WC, Zou KH, Alexander EK, Larsen PR, Ellen Marqusee E, Benson CB, Frates MC, Gawande A, Moore FD, Cibas ES. The predictive value of the fine needle aspiration diagnosis “Suspicious for a Follicular Neoplasm, Hürthle Cell Type” in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:139–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Renshaw AA. Focal features of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid in fine-needle aspiration material are strongly associated with papillary carcinoma at resection. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118(2):208–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Weber D, Brainard J, Chen L. Atypical epithelial cells, cannot exclude papillary carcinoma, in fine needle aspiration of the thyroid. Acta Cytol. 2008;52(3):320–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Logani S, Gupta PK, LiVolsi VA, et al. Thyroid nodules with FNA cytology suspicious for follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: follow-up and management. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;23(6):380–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Smejkal V, Smejkalova E, Rosa M, et al. Cytologic changes simulating malignancy in thyrotoxic goiters treated with carbimazole. Acta Cytol. 1985;29:173–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Granter SR, Cibas ES. Cytologic findings in thyroid nodules after 131iodine treatment of hyperthyroidism. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107:20–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Centeno BA, Szyfelbein WM, Daniels GH, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid gland in patients with prior Graves’ disease treated with radioactive iodine: morphologic findings and potential pitfalls. Acta Cytol. 1996;40:1189–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Haugen BR, Alexander E, Bible KC, et al. American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Renshaw AA. Does a repeated benign aspirate change the risk of malignancy after an initial atypical thyroid fine-needle aspiration? Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134(5):788–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. VanderLaan PA, Marqusee E, Krane JF. Clinical outcome for atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: should repeated FNA be the preferred initial approach? Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135(5):770–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Baloch Z, LiVolsi VA, Jain P, Jain R, Aljada I, Mandel S, Langer JE, Gupta PK. Role of repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the management of thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;29:203–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Krane JF, Cibas ES, Alexander EK, Paschke R, Eszlinger M. Molecular analysis of residual ThinPrep material from thyroid FNAs increases diagnostic sensitivity. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123:356–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Chudova D, Diggans J, Friedman L, Kloos RT, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Raab SS, Rosai J, Steward DL, Walsh PS, Wilde JI, Zeiger MA, Lanman RB, Haugen BR. Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(8):705–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Baca SC, Wong KS, Strickland KC, Kim MI, Barletta JA, Cibas ES, Krane JF, Marqusee E, Angell TE. Qualifiers of atypia in the cytologic diagnosis of thyroid nodules are associated with different Afirma Gene expression classifier results and clinical outcomes. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017; doi:10.1002/cncy.21827. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28152275

  50. Brauner E, Holmes BJ, Krane JF, Nishino M, Zurakowski D, Hennessey JV, Faquin WC, Parangi S. Performance of the Afirma gene expression classifier in Hürthle cell thyroid nodules differs from other indeterminate thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2015;25:789–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ali SZ, Nayar R, Krane JF, Westra WH. Atlas of thyroid cytopathology with histopathologic correlations. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey F. Krane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krane, J.F., Nayar, R., Renshaw, A.A. (2018). Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance. In: Ali, S., Cibas, E. (eds) The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60570-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60570-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60569-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60570-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics