Skip to main content

From Broken to Linked Innovation: The Underlying Concept

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Linked Innovation
  • 594 Accesses

Abstract

Promising to drive economic sustainability in research centers while preserving research quality, linked innovation is framed in this chapter as the connected process between research and commercialization, a route in which the investigation done is transformed into economic value to make the process sustainable. It is a track that interconnects two aspects: the pull of market needs and the push of knowledge. Perceived demand will be met only if the appropriate knowledge is available, and innovation will happen only if there is a market for it. Eight symptoms are then described for identifying the gaps in the innovation process, called broken innovation, through the examination of four challenges: performance metrics, market understanding, industry collaborations, and innovation ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stevens, G. A. & Burley, J. 3000 raw ideas equal 1 commercial success! Research Technology Management 40, 16–27 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schumpeter, J. A. Creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy 82–85 (George Allen and Unwin, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lane, J. P. & Flagg, J. L. Translating three states of knowledge–discovery, invention, and innovation. Implementation Science 5, 9 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts, E. B. What we’ve learned: managing invention and innovation. Research Technology Management 31, 11–29 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baily, M., Haskel, J., Hazan, E., Marston, N. & Rajah, T. Innovation Matters Reviving The Growth Engine (McKinsey, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lichtenthaler, U. External commercialization of knowledge: Review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 7, 231–255 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Institute of Medicine (US). Forum on Drug Discovery, development, and translation Challenges in Clinical Research (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kose, A. & Claessens, S. Financial Crises Explanations, Types, and Implications (International Monetary Fund, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Şendoğdu, A. A. & Diken, A. A research on the problems encountered in the collaboration between university and industry. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 99, 966–975 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E. & Link, A. N. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 14, 111–133 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Technology 29, 109–123 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Azároff, L. V. Industry–University collaboration: How to make it work. Research Management 25, 31–34 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Dierdonck, R. & Debackere, K. Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian Universities. R & D Management 18, 341–353 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cyert, R. M. & Goodman, P. S. Creating effective university–industry alliances: an organizational learning perspective. Organizational Dynamics 25, 45–57 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faems, D., Van Looy, B. & Debackere, K. Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22, 238–250 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vohora, A., Wright, M. & Lockett, A. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy 33, 147–175 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kline, S. J. & Rosenberg, N. The Positive Sum Strategy 275–305 (National Academies Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sander, E. ERC Best Practices Manual Chapter 5 Industrial Collaboration and Innovation (National Science Foundation, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Perkmann, M. et al. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy 42, 423–442 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josemaria Siota .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siota, J. (2018). From Broken to Linked Innovation: The Underlying Concept. In: Linked Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60546-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics