Statistical Concepts in Laboratory Quality Control

  • Amir Momeni
  • Matthew Pincus
  • Jenny Libien


Quality control ensures that the performance of a test is within the limits set by validation experiments as well as the requirements of the lab and regulatory bodies. The goal of quality control is to minimize variability and maximize accuracy and precision; this requires measurements of quality metrics and interpretation and analysis of these quality metrics by statistical methods.

Quality control requires frequent monitoring of quality metrics and application of statistical tools to identify possible performance problems. These quality metrics measure variability and error through either internal or external quality control experiments. The statistical tests identify whether the observed variability is random as well as identifying error in excess of the lab’s acceptability criteria.

In this chapter, we will review the statistical concepts that are used in laboratory quality management.


  1. 1.
    Dasgupta A, Wahed A. Clinical chemistry, immunology and laboratory quality control: a comprehensive review for board preparation, certification and clinical practice. Academic Press: USA; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sampson ML, Rehak NN, Sokoll LJ, Ruddel ME, Gerhardt GA, Remaley AT. Time adjusted sensitivity analysis: a new statistical test for the optimization of delta check rules. J Clin Ligand Assay. 2007;30(1–2):44–54.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McPherson RA, Pincus MR. Henry's clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods. Elsevier Health Sciences: USA; 2016.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Westgard JO. Six sigma quality design and control. Madison: Westgard QC, Incorporated; 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karkalousos P, Evangelopoulos A. Quality control in clinical laboratories. INTECH Open Access Publisher: USA; 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Westgard JO, Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing today. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(3):343–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Westgard JO. Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies. Ann Clin Biochem. 2003;40(6):593–611.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Green GA, Carey RN, Westgard JO, Carten T, Shablesky L, Achord D, Page E, Van Le A. Quality control for qualitative assays: quantitative QC procedure designed to assure analytical quality required for an ELISA of hepatitis B surface antigen. Clin Chem. 1997;43(9):1618–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cembrowski GS, Chandler EP, Westgard JO. Assessment of “average of normals” quality control procedures and guidelines for implementation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984;81(4):492–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Douville P, Cembrowski GS, Strauss JF. Evaluation of the average of patients: application to endocrine assays. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;167(2):173–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wheeler LA, Sheiner LB. A clinical evaluation of various delta check methods. Clin Chem. 1981;27(1):5–9. ChicagoPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, Minchinela J, Perich C, Simon M. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59(7):491–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bull BS, Elashoff RM, Heilbron DC, Couperus J. A study of various estimators for the derivation of quality control procedures from patient erythrocyte indices. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974;61(4):473–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aslan D, Kuralay F, Tanyalsin T, Topraksu M. Use of averages of patient data for quality control. Accred Qual Assur J Qual Comp Reliab Chem Meas. 1999;4(9):431–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lucas JM, Saccucci MS. Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics. 1990;32(1):1–12. ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunter JS. The exponentially weighted moving average. J Qual Technol. 1986;18(4):203–10. ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Momeni
    • 1
  • Matthew Pincus
    • 1
  • Jenny Libien
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PathologyState University of New York, Downstate Medical CenterBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations