Abstract
While remarkable progress has been made recently to improve the state of occupational safety, the number of occupational accidents is still unacceptable. In addition, the organizational costs related to these safety problems in the workplace are staggering. Therefore, effective strategies are needed to guide the continuous improvement of safety performance. Common approaches include setting safety goals, identifying the key activities/interventions to reach those goals, and evaluating performance. The most challenging and fundamental issue within these approaches is evaluating safety performance. While it has been a focus of safety professionals, concerns still exist among researchers with regard to how safety performance can be appropriately and accurately measured to improve decision support systems. Recently, researchers in the field of safety have begun directing efforts towards new approaches for measuring safety performance by addressing leading indicators. However, because of its nature and utility, the ideas and concepts of leading indicators have remained unclear. In an effort to overcome this challenge, this study attempts to distinguish between the two common aspects of safety performance, observable activities and outcomes. The importance of using leading indicators for steering safety performance is then highlighted. In order to meet these objectives, the results chain model, which has been introduced by several researchers for outlining the program development, is employed. The elements of the results chain model are then interrelated with relevant safety concepts. As a result, the relationship between the leading and lagging indicators and safety performance is identified. A set of leading indicators that predict safety performance is proposed. Further, the important implications of this study for both academic communities and practitioners are discussed as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH (2015) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/about/
Vorley, G.: Mini Guide to Root Cause Analysis. Quality Management and Training, London (2008)
Nahrgang, J.D., Morgeson, F.P., Hofmann, D.A.: Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 96, 71–94 (2011)
Wallace, J.C.: Creating a safety conscious organization and workforce. Org. Dyn. 45(4), 305–312 (2016)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=TESTIMONIES&p_id=1482#footnote2
Janicak, C.A.: Safety Metrics: Tools and Techniques for Measuring Safety Performance. Government Institutes (2009)
Neal, A., Griffin, M.A.: A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J. Appl. Psychol. 91(4), 946 (2006)
Wu, T.C., Chen, C.H., Li, C.C.: A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 21(3), 307–318 (2008)
Törner, M.: Safety climate in a broad context-what is it, how does it work, and can it be managed? SJWEH Suppl. 1(5), 5–8 (2008)
Gertler, P.J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L.B., Vermeersch, C.M.: Impact Evaluation in Practice. The World Bank (2011) http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTHDOFFICE/Resources/5485726-1295455628620/Impact_Evaluation_in_Practice.pdf
World Health Planning: WHO (2014) http://www.who.int/about/resources_planning/WHO_GPW12_results_chain.pdf
Jahanmehr, N., Rashidian, A., Khosravi, A., Farzadfar, F., Shariati, M., Majdzadeh, R., Sari, A.A., Mesdaghinia, A.: A conceptual framework for evaluation of public health and primary care system performance in Iran. Glob. J. Health Sci. 7(4), 341 (2015)
Christian, M.S., Bradley, J.C., Wallace, J.C., Burke, M.J.: Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(5), 1103 (2009)
Clarke, S.: An integrative model of safety climate: linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 83(3), 553–578 (2010)
Card, A.J.: A new tool for hazard analysis and force-field analysis: the Lovebug diagram. Clin. Risk 19(4–5), 87–92 (2013)
El-nagar, R., Hosny, H., Askar, H.S.: Development of a safety performance index for construction projects in Egypt. Am. J. Civil Eng. Archit. 3(5), 182–192 (2015)
Mengolini, A., Debarberis, L.: Effectiveness evaluation methodology for safety processes to enhance organisational culture in hazardous installations. J. Hazard. Mater. 155(1), 243–252 (2008)
Toellner, J.: Improving safety and health performance: identifying and measuring leading indicators. Prof. Saf. 46(9), 42 (2001)
Findley, M., Smith, S., Kress, T., Petty, G., Enoch, K.: Injury and cost control-safety program elements in construction: which ones best prevent injuries, control costs? Construction remains the most dangerous of all US industries based on the rate of. Prof. Saf. 49(2), 14–21 (2004)
Cadieux, J., Roy, M., Desmarais, L.: A preliminary validation of a new measure of occupational health and safety. J. Saf. Res. 37(4), 413–419 (2006)
Griffin, M.A., Hu, X.: How leaders differentially motivate safety compliance and safety participation: the role of monitoring, inspiring, and learning. Saf. Sci. 31(60), 196–202 (2013)
Griffin, M.A., Neal, A.: Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 5(3), 347 (2000)
Hinze, J., Thurman, S., Wehle, A.: Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Saf. Sci. 51(1), 23–28 (2013)
Reiman, T., Pietikäinen, E.: Leading indicators of system safety–monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Saf. Sci. 50(10), 1993–2000 (2012)
Zwetsloot, G.I., Drupsteen, L., de Vroome, E.M.: Safety, reliability and worker satisfaction during organizational change. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 31(27), 1–7 (2014)
Step Change in Safety: Leading performance indicators: guidance for effective use. Step Change in Safety, Aberdeen (2003)
Agumba, J.N., Thwala, W., Haupt, T.: Identification of health and safety performance improvement measuring indicators: a literature review. In: West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, 19–21 July 2011, Accra, Ghana, 19 July 2011 (p. 593)
Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J.M., Vázquez-Ordás, C.J.: Safety culture: analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. J. Saf. Res. 38(6), 627–641 (2007)
Rajendran, S., Gambatese, J.A.: Development and initial validation of sustainable construction safety and health rating system. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 135(10), 1067–1075 (2009)
Sinelnikov, S., Inouye, J., Kerper, S.: Using leading indicators to measure occupational health and safety performance. Saf. Sci. 28(72), 240–248 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mousavi, S.S., Cudney, E.A., Trucco, P. (2018). Towards a Framework for Steering Safety Performance: A Review of the Literature on Leading Indicators. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 604. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60524-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60525-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)