Skip to main content

Towards a Framework for Steering Safety Performance: A Review of the Literature on Leading Indicators

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 604))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While remarkable progress has been made recently to improve the state of occupational safety, the number of occupational accidents is still unacceptable. In addition, the organizational costs related to these safety problems in the workplace are staggering. Therefore, effective strategies are needed to guide the continuous improvement of safety performance. Common approaches include setting safety goals, identifying the key activities/interventions to reach those goals, and evaluating performance. The most challenging and fundamental issue within these approaches is evaluating safety performance. While it has been a focus of safety professionals, concerns still exist among researchers with regard to how safety performance can be appropriately and accurately measured to improve decision support systems. Recently, researchers in the field of safety have begun directing efforts towards new approaches for measuring safety performance by addressing leading indicators. However, because of its nature and utility, the ideas and concepts of leading indicators have remained unclear. In an effort to overcome this challenge, this study attempts to distinguish between the two common aspects of safety performance, observable activities and outcomes. The importance of using leading indicators for steering safety performance is then highlighted. In order to meet these objectives, the results chain model, which has been introduced by several researchers for outlining the program development, is employed. The elements of the results chain model are then interrelated with relevant safety concepts. As a result, the relationship between the leading and lagging indicators and safety performance is identified. A set of leading indicators that predict safety performance is proposed. Further, the important implications of this study for both academic communities and practitioners are discussed as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH (2015) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/about/

  2. Vorley, G.: Mini Guide to Root Cause Analysis. Quality Management and Training, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nahrgang, J.D., Morgeson, F.P., Hofmann, D.A.: Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 96, 71–94 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallace, J.C.: Creating a safety conscious organization and workforce. Org. Dyn. 45(4), 305–312 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=TESTIMONIES&p_id=1482#footnote2

  6. Janicak, C.A.: Safety Metrics: Tools and Techniques for Measuring Safety Performance. Government Institutes (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Neal, A., Griffin, M.A.: A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J. Appl. Psychol. 91(4), 946 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, T.C., Chen, C.H., Li, C.C.: A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 21(3), 307–318 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Törner, M.: Safety climate in a broad context-what is it, how does it work, and can it be managed? SJWEH Suppl. 1(5), 5–8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gertler, P.J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L.B., Vermeersch, C.M.: Impact Evaluation in Practice. The World Bank (2011) http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTHDOFFICE/Resources/5485726-1295455628620/Impact_Evaluation_in_Practice.pdf

  11. World Health Planning: WHO (2014) http://www.who.int/about/resources_planning/WHO_GPW12_results_chain.pdf

  12. Jahanmehr, N., Rashidian, A., Khosravi, A., Farzadfar, F., Shariati, M., Majdzadeh, R., Sari, A.A., Mesdaghinia, A.: A conceptual framework for evaluation of public health and primary care system performance in Iran. Glob. J. Health Sci. 7(4), 341 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Christian, M.S., Bradley, J.C., Wallace, J.C., Burke, M.J.: Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(5), 1103 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke, S.: An integrative model of safety climate: linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 83(3), 553–578 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Card, A.J.: A new tool for hazard analysis and force-field analysis: the Lovebug diagram. Clin. Risk 19(4–5), 87–92 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. El-nagar, R., Hosny, H., Askar, H.S.: Development of a safety performance index for construction projects in Egypt. Am. J. Civil Eng. Archit. 3(5), 182–192 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mengolini, A., Debarberis, L.: Effectiveness evaluation methodology for safety processes to enhance organisational culture in hazardous installations. J. Hazard. Mater. 155(1), 243–252 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Toellner, J.: Improving safety and health performance: identifying and measuring leading indicators. Prof. Saf. 46(9), 42 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Findley, M., Smith, S., Kress, T., Petty, G., Enoch, K.: Injury and cost control-safety program elements in construction: which ones best prevent injuries, control costs? Construction remains the most dangerous of all US industries based on the rate of. Prof. Saf. 49(2), 14–21 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cadieux, J., Roy, M., Desmarais, L.: A preliminary validation of a new measure of occupational health and safety. J. Saf. Res. 37(4), 413–419 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Griffin, M.A., Hu, X.: How leaders differentially motivate safety compliance and safety participation: the role of monitoring, inspiring, and learning. Saf. Sci. 31(60), 196–202 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Griffin, M.A., Neal, A.: Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 5(3), 347 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hinze, J., Thurman, S., Wehle, A.: Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Saf. Sci. 51(1), 23–28 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reiman, T., Pietikäinen, E.: Leading indicators of system safety–monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Saf. Sci. 50(10), 1993–2000 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zwetsloot, G.I., Drupsteen, L., de Vroome, E.M.: Safety, reliability and worker satisfaction during organizational change. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 31(27), 1–7 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Step Change in Safety: Leading performance indicators: guidance for effective use. Step Change in Safety, Aberdeen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agumba, J.N., Thwala, W., Haupt, T.: Identification of health and safety performance improvement measuring indicators: a literature review. In: West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, 19–21 July 2011, Accra, Ghana, 19 July 2011 (p. 593)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J.M., Vázquez-Ordás, C.J.: Safety culture: analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. J. Saf. Res. 38(6), 627–641 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rajendran, S., Gambatese, J.A.: Development and initial validation of sustainable construction safety and health rating system. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 135(10), 1067–1075 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinelnikov, S., Inouye, J., Kerper, S.: Using leading indicators to measure occupational health and safety performance. Saf. Sci. 28(72), 240–248 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Sajad Mousavi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mousavi, S.S., Cudney, E.A., Trucco, P. (2018). Towards a Framework for Steering Safety Performance: A Review of the Literature on Leading Indicators. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 604. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60524-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60525-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics