Abstract
This chapter traces the role played by the Democratic Deficit during the deployment of an Urban Governance Network in the City of Madrid. The Deficit is considered as an actor—rather than a feature of Urban Governance- that helps authorities, private actors and citizens, to contest or sustain configurations of power, politicise or de-politicisice topics related to urban life, and ultimately to produce the materiality of the City.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barry, Andrew. 2013. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. John Wiley & Sons.
Blakeley, G. 2010. Governing Ourselves: Citizen Participation and Governance in Barcelona and Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (1): 130–145.
Callon, Michel. 1986. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge 32: 196–223.
Chhotray, Vasudha, and Gerry Stoker. 2009. Governance Theory and Practice. A Cross- Disciplinary Approach. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Harvard University Press.
Farias, Ignacio, and Thomas Bender, eds. 2010. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. Routledge.
Hajer, Maarten. 2003. Policy Without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void. Policy Sciences 36 (2): 175–195.
Harman, Graham. 2009. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Prahran, VIC: Re. press.
Harvey, Penelope. 2005. The Materiality of State-Effects: An Ethnography of a Road in the Peruvian Andes. In State Formation, ed. C. Krohn-Hansen et al. London: Pluto.
Keil, R. 2009. The Urban Politics of Roll‐With‐It Neoliberalization. City 13 (2–3): 230–245.
Latour, Bruno. 1986. Visualization and Cognition. Knowledge and Society 6: 1–40.
———. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
———. 1990. Technology is Society Made Durable. The Sociological Review 38 (S1): 103–131.
———. 1993. The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.
———. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press.
———. 2003. What If We Talked Politics a Little? Contemporary Political Theory 2 (2): 143–164.
———. 2005. Reassembling the Social-An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Laurent, Brice. 2011. Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 649–666.
Marres, Noortje. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Springer.
Marres, Noortje Suzanne. 2005. No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits After the Displacement of Politics. Diss., Universiteit Van Amsterdam. UvA-DARE, Amsterdam, Web, August 7, 2015.
McFarlane, Colin. 2011. Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. John Wiley & Sons.
Metzger, Jonathan, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck. 2015. The Contested Terrain of European Territorial Governance. In Planning Against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance, ed. Jonathan Metzger, Philip Allmendiger, and Sitjn Oosterlynck, 1–28. New York: Routledge.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2005a. On the Political. London: Routledge.
———. 2005b. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oosterlynck, Stijn, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2010. Noise Reduction: The Postpolitical Quandary of Night Flights at Brussels Airport. Environment and Planning A 42 (7): 1577–1594.
Rancière, Jacques. 2007. Hatred of Democracy. London: Verso.
Rubio, Fernando Domínguez, and Uriel Fogué. 2015. Unfolding the Political Capacities of Design. In What is Cosmopolitical Design? ed. Albena Yaneva and Zaera Polo Alejandro, 143–160. London: Ashgate.
Schmitt, Carl. 2008. The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition. University of Chicago Press.
Sørensen, Eva, and Jacob Torfing. 2007. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Swyngedouw, Erik. 2005. Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-Beyond-The-State. Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006.
———. 2007. The Post-Political City. In Urban Politics Now: Re-imagining Democracy in the Neoliberal City, ed. BAVO. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
———. 2009. The Antinomies of the Postpolitical City: In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (3): 601–620.
———. 2010. Impossible Sustainability and the Post-political Condition. In Making Strategies in Spatial Planning, 185–205. Netherlands: Springer.
———. 2011. Interrogating Post-Democratization: Reclaiming Egalitarian Political Spaces. Political Geography 30 (7): 370–380.
———. 2014a. Depoliticization (‘The Political’). In Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era, ed. G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, and G. Kallis. London: Routledge.
———. 2014b. Insurgent Architects, Radical Cities and the Promise of the Political. In The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticization, Specters of Radical Politics, ed. J. Wilson and E. Swyngedouw. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
———. 2015. Depoliticized Environments and the Promises of the Anthropocene. In International Handbook of Political Ecology, ed. R. Bryant. London: Edward Elgar.
Swyngedouw, Erik, and Guy Baeten. 2001. Scaling the City: The Political Economy of ‘Glocal’ Development- Brussels’ Conundrum. European Planning Studies 9 (7): 827–849.
Swyngedouw, Erik, F. Moulaert, and A. Rodriguez. 2002. Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy. Antipode 34 (3): 542–577.
Taylor, M. 2007. Community Participation in the Real World: Opportunities and Pitfalls in New Governance Spaces. Urban Studies 44 (2): 297–317.
Žižek, Slavoj. 1999. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sepúlveda, G.H.T. (2018). Tracing the Democratic Deficit: An Actor-Network Theory Approach to an Urban Governance Network in Madrid. In: Kurath, M., Marskamp, M., Paulos, J., Ruegg, J. (eds) Relational Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60462-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60462-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60461-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60462-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)