Skip to main content

Autonomous Stall Recovery Dynamics as a Prevention Tool for General Aviation Loss of Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 597))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Loss of control in general aviation is responsible for 48% of reported accidents. The United States government has encouraged ulterior training in the field of stall recovery and understanding of the various factors that cause loss of control events. Although recommendations have been implemented, loss of control related accidents continue to mark a high percentage among aviation accidents. This paper proposes an enhanced autonomous loss of control recovery avionic, developed upon the Trajectory Recovery System (TRS). The newly developed system (TRS Mk.2) is described in this document with regards to its design characteristics and high-level requirements. The system will provide autonomous stall recovery, backup information to avoid workload spikes in case of system failure, and a parameter summary to inform the pilot of the recovery’s performance. The system is also proposed as a means to increase pilot training, as a byproduct of recovering from real LOC events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Transportation Safety Board: NTSB 2017-2018 most wanted list of transportation safety improvements. In: National Transportation Safety Board. https://www.ntsb.gov/safety/mwl/Documents/2017-18/MWL-Brochure2017-18.pdf. Accessed 2016

  2. Milne-Thomson, L.: Theoretical Aerodynamics, 1st edn. Dover Publications, Inc., New York (1973). (All rights reserved under Pan American and International Copyright Conventions)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell, M.: Complexity A Guided Tour 1. Oxford University Press Inc., New York (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Lorenz, E.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130–141 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boy, G.: Orchestrating Human-Centered Design, 1st edn. Springer, London (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Kasdaglis, N., Bernard, T., Stephane, L., Boy, G.: Affordant Guidance for In-Flight Loss of Control: The Trajectory Recovery System (TRS). HCI Aero, Paris (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasdaglis, N.: Trajectory recovery system: angle of attack guidance for inflight loss of control. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Conference Proceedings on Human-Computer Interaction International - Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, pp. 397–408 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernard, T., Kasdaglis, N., Rolins, A., Troshchenko, A., Stephane, L.: LOC-S: Improved model and control algorithm for a stall recovery on-board avionics system. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky (2017, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Troshchenko, A., Kasdaglis, N., Bernard, T., Stephane, L.: Development of an OpenGL stall recovery system in a restricted-resource being 737 simulator with external data feed for flight testing. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky (2017, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Aviation Safety Agency: Notice of Proposed Amendment 2015-13: Loss of Control Prevention and Recovery Training. Proposed Amendment, EASA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flight Standard Services: Private Pilot For Airplane Single-Engine Land and Sea Practical Test Standards. Aviation Supplies & Academics Inc., Washington (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forrest, F.: Angle of attack presentation in pilot training. Final Report, Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pope, S.: Flying angle of attack - flying with the technology will improve safety. In: Flying Magazine. http://www.flyingmag.com/technique/tip-week/flying-angle-attack. Accessed 11 Feb 2014

  14. Cummings, M., Stimpson, A., Clamann, M.: Functional requirements for onboard intelligent automation in single pilot operations. In: AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace, San Diego (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, A., Cotter, T.: Human opinion counts-making decisions in critical situations when working with highly automated systems. In: Long, S., Ng, D.C., Nepal, B. (eds.) American Society for Engineering Management (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor, A.: Human-machine interaction in the cockpit and applicable design changes towards better collaboration. In: AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors and System Interactions, vol. 497, pp. 271–279. Springer, Orlando (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boy, G.: On the complexity of situation awareness. In: 19th Triennal Congress of the IEA, Melbourne, Australia (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McIntyre, C., Roozendaal, B.: Adrenal stress hormones and enhanced memory for emotionally arousing experiences. In: Bermudez-Rattoni, F. (ed.) Neural Plasticity and Memory: From Genes to Brain Imaging, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiziano Bernard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bernard, T., Stephane, L., Boy, G.A. (2018). Autonomous Stall Recovery Dynamics as a Prevention Tool for General Aviation Loss of Control. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60440-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60441-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics