Skip to main content

Revealing Big Data Emerging Technology as Enabler of LMS Technologies Transferability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics Toward Next-Generation Intelligence

Part of the book series: Studies in Big Data ((SBD,volume 30))

Abstract

We are living in the information age where almost every aspect of our life, directly or indirectly, relies on information and communication technology (ICT). The uses of ICT through big data has increased which therefore ended to be everything can directly go through online and people are now able to upload, retrieve, store their information and collect information to big data. Through big data learning management system (LMS), student managed and stored their intangible assets such as knowledge and information, documents, report, and administration purpose. LMS is basically application software that is capable and designed to provide electronic learning, and has been acknowledged to yield an integrated platform providing content, the delivery as well as management of learning, while supplying accessibility to a wide range of users that include students, content creators, lecturers as well as administrators. Universities aim to successfully implement a LMS in order to ease the learning process. This successful implementation lead to Universities make Business Process Re-engineering for their learning activity. Throughout the years, successful implementations of LMS have proven to be a very beneficial tool, providing ease and convenience. LMS is used not only in academic institutions such as schools and universities, but is also popularly used in a number of private corporations to provide online learning, training and is also capable of automating the process of record-keeping as well as employee registration. The objectives of this study are to reveal big data as enabler of LMS as Business Process Re-engineering bring users specifically, various benefits of its multi-function ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wiberg, M. (2012). Interaction per se: Understanding the ambience of. Innovative Applications of Ambient Intelligence: Advances in Smart Systems, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kamal, S., Ripon, S. H., Dey, N., Ashour, A. S., & Santhi, V. (2016). A MapReduce approach to diminish imbalance parameters for big deoxyribonucleic acid dataset. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 131, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgarten, M., Mulvenna, M., Rooney, N., & Reid, J. (2013). Keyword-based sentiment mining using Twitter. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence, 5(2), 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eke, H. N. (2010). The perspective of E-learning and libraries in Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Library Review, 59(4), 274–290. doi:10.1108/00242531011038587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of E-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1634473719?accountid=9765

  6. Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Antoine, J. E. (2011). E-learning: A student’s perspective a phenomenological investigation (Order No. 3494459). Available from ProQuest Central (921887410). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/921887410?accountid=9765

  8. Tao, Y. H., Yeh, C. R., & Sun, S. I. (2006). Improving training needs assessment processes via the internet: System design and qualitative study. Internet Research, 16(4), 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2003). Exploring the world wide web for on-line learning: A perspective from Taiwan. Educational Technology, 40(3), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alvandi, E. O. (2011). Emotions and information processing: A theoretical approach. International Journal of Synthetic Emotions (IJSE), 2(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Odella, F. (2017). Technology studies and the sociological debate on monitoring of social interactions. In Biometrics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 529–558). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, A., & Madigan, D. (2006). Digital literacies for learning. London: Facet Publishing. ISBN 9781856045636.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ndubisi, N. O. (2004). Factors influencing E-learning adoption intention: Examining the determinant structure of the decomposed theory of planned behaviour constructs (pp. 252–262).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harasim, L. (1995). Learning networks; A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falvo, D. A., & Johnson, B. F. (2007). The use of learning management systems in the United States. TechTrends, 51(2), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heirdsfield, A., Walker, S., Tambyah, M., & Beutel, D. (2011). Blackboard as an online learning environment: What do teacher education students and staff think? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(7), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lonn, S., Teasley, S. D., & Krumm, A. E. (2010). Who needs to do what where?: Using learning management systems on residential vs. commuter campuses. Computers and Education, 56, 642–649. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2009). Criteria for evaluating synchronous learning management systems: Arguments from the distance language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 1–18.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Busaidi, A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2010). Instructors’ acceptance of learning management systems: A theoretical framework. Communications of the IBIMA, 2010, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. (2009). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers and Education, 53(3), 575–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, A., & Johnson, J. (2007). Five advantages of using learning management system.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lindgaard, G. (1994). Usability testing and system evaluation: A guide for designing useful computer system (1st ed.). UK: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Algahtani, A. F. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of the e-learning experience in some universities in Saudi Arabia from male students’ perceptions. Durham theses, Durham University.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Almunawar, M., Susanto, H., & Anshari, M. (2013b). A cultural transferability on IT business application: iReservation system. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 4(2), 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  25. López, M. (2014). Right-time experiences: Driving revenue with mobile and big data. Somerset, NJ, USA: Wiley. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.com

  26. Bhatt, C., Dey, N., & Ashour, A. S. (2017). Internet of things and big data technologies for next generation healthcare. Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Mason, C. (2015). Engineering kindness: Building a machine with compassionate intelligence. International Journal of Synthetic Emotions (IJSE), 6(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hurwitz, J., Halper, F., & Kaufman, M. (2013). Big data for dummies. Somerset, NJ, USA: Wiley. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.com

  29. Kshetri, Nir. (2014). The emerging role of big data in key development issues: Opportunities, challenges, and concerns. Big Data and Society. doi:10.1177/2053951714564227

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hannu, K. Ã., Jussila, J., & Jaani, V. Ã. (2013). Social media use and potential in business-to-business companies innovation. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), 5(1), 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mongo D. B. (n.d.). What is big data? Selecting a big data technology: Operational vs. analytical. Retrieved from https://www.mongodb.com/big-data-explained

  32. Fast Company Staff. (2015). The World’s top 10 most innovative companies of 2015 in big data. Most innovative companies. Retrieved from http://www.fastcompany.com/3041638/most-innovative-companies-2015/the-worlds-top-10-most-innovative-companies-in-big-data

  33. Why big data has some big problems when it comes to public policy. (2014). San Francisco: Newstex. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1618317749?accountid=9765

  34. Toub, C., & Alliance B. (2012). Big data provides big risk and big opportunity. Institutional Investor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1030124978?accountid=9765

  35. Morton, J., Runciman, B., & Gordon, K. (2014). Big data: Opportunities and challenges. Swindon, GBR: BCS Learning & Development Limited. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.com

  36. Smith, K. (2015). Big data big concerns. Best’s Review, 7, 58–61. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1729782816?accountid=9765

  37. Susanto, H., Almunawar, M. N., & Tuan, Y. C. (2011a). Information security management system standards: A comparative study of the big five. International Journal of Electrical Computer Sciences IJECSIJENS, 11(5), 23–29

    Google Scholar 

  38. Susanto, H., Almunawar, M. N., Tuan, Y. C., Aksoy, M., & Syam, W. P. (2011b). Integrated solution modeling software: A new paradigm on information security review and assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Susanto, H., & Almunawar, M. N. (2012). Information security awareness within business environment: An it review.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Susanto, H., & Bin Muhaya, F. (2010). Multimedia information security architecture framework. In 5th International Conference on Future Information Technology (FutureTech) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Susanto, H., Almunawar, M. N., & Tuan, Y. C. (2012b). I-Sol framework: As a tool for measurement and refinement of information security management standard.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Horton, W. K. (2001). Leading e-learning. Unites States of America: ASTD.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). Challenges of assessment for E-learning. E-learning: Concepts and practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stair, R. M., & Reynolds, G. W. (2014). Principles of information systems (Vol. 11). USA: Course Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Suneja, V. (2015). Issues with big data analytics–As it is.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (from paper to online).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Anderson, T. (2008). Characteristics of interactive online learning media. In P. J. Fahy (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (Vol. 2, p. 167). Canada: AU Press, Athabasca University.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Almunawar, M. N., Anshari, M., & Susanto, H. (2013a). Crafting strategies for sustainability: How travel agents should react in facing a disintermediation. Operational Research, 13(3), 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vasilescu, C., & Codreanu, A. (2013). E-learning behaviors and their impact on andragogy. In Conference proceedings of» eLearning and Software for Education «eLSE (No. 01, pp. 126–137). Universitatea Nationala de Aparare Carol I.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Maddix, M. A. (2013). E-learning in the 21st century: A selected top ten book reviews since 2001. Christian Education Journal, 10(1), 163–179. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1344162401?accountid=9765

  51. Arkorful, V. (2014). The role of E-learning, the advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research, 2, 397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Susanto, H., Almunawar, M. N., & Tuan, Y. C. (2012a). Information security challenge and breaches: novelty approach on measuring ISO 27001 readiness level. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(1) (UK: IJET Publications).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heru Susanto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Susanto, H., Chen, C.K., Almunawar, M.N. (2018). Revealing Big Data Emerging Technology as Enabler of LMS Technologies Transferability. In: Dey, N., Hassanien, A., Bhatt, C., Ashour, A., Satapathy, S. (eds) Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics Toward Next-Generation Intelligence. Studies in Big Data, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60435-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60435-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60434-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60435-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics