Skip to main content

Crew Performance and Situation Awareness in Three UAS GCS Layouts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems (AHFE 2017)

Abstract

The aim of Canada’s Joint Unmanned Surveillance and Target Acquisition System program is to acquire an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for Royal Canadian Air Force’s domestic and international operations. This UAS will be capable of complementing existing reconnaissance, surveillance, target acquisition, and engagement capabilities. Defence Research and Development Canada has developed a UAS ground control station simulator to investigate crew layouts, airworthiness certification, UAS crew training technologies and strategies, as well as novel human-machine interfaces. This paper investigates crew performance and situation awareness in three layouts of the ground control station: distributed, classroom, and boardroom. Preliminary results indicate that the boardroom layout outperforms the other layouts in terms of crew communication, teamwork and situation awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cook, K.: The silent force multiplier: the history and roles of UAVs in warfare. In: IEEE 2007 Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–7. IEEE Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garrett-Rempel, D.: Will JUSTAS prevail? Procuring a UAS capability for Canada. R. Can. Air Force J. 4(1), 19–31 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Leary, M.B., Mortensen, M.: Go (con)figure: subgroups, imbalance, and iso-lates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. 21(1), 115–131 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singer, M., Grant, S.C., Commarford, P., Kring, J., Zavod, M.: Team performance in distributed virtual environments. Technical Report 1118, US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, p. 70 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cordova, A., Keller, K.M., Menthe, L., Rhodes, C.: Virtual collaboration for a distributed enterprise. Technical Report. RAND Corporation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Driskell, J.E., Radtke, P.H., Salas, E.: Virtual teams: effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 7(4), 297–323 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 1 Canadian Air Division: JUSTAS concept of operations (CONOPS). Canadian Armed Forces (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, W., Baker, K., Moreau, R.: Communication requirements and workspace layout effectiveness for the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) in CAGE IIIB. DRDC Scientific Report DRDC-RDDC-2015-R258 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hou, M.: Testbed for integrated GCS experimentation and rehearsal (TIGER) development summary I. DRDC Technical Report, DRDC-RDDC-2015-L282 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McColl, D., Banbury, S., Hou, M.: Testbed for integrated ground control station experimentation and rehearsal: crew performance and authority pathway concept development. In: Lackey, S., Shumaker, S. (eds.) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. LNCS, vol. 9740, pp. 433–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Covas-Smith, M., Grant, S.C., Hou, M., Joralmon, D.Q., Banbury, S.: Development of a testbed for integrated ground control station experimentation and rehearsal (TIGER): training remotely piloted aircraft operations and data exploitation. In: Unmanned Systems, pp. 1–11. Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McColl, D., et al.: Authority pathway: intelligent adaptive automation for a UAS ground control station. In: Human-Computer Interaction International Conference 2017, pp. 1–14 (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Banbury, S., Baker, K., Proulx, R., and Tremblay, S.: TA1: unmanned air system operator information flow and cognitive task analyses. DRDC Contract Report DRDC-RDDC-2014-C307 (PA) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baker, K., Banbury, S.: Force level tactical command and control in a littoral environment. Report I: Literature Review and Mission Analysis. DRDC Contract Report CR2008-999 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478), pp. 3/1–3/17. NATO-AGARD, Neuilly Sur Seine (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank everyone who helped with the experiment, especially Capt. Sonny Rose, Leo Boutette, Adele Mininni, John Townsend, Juliana Fung, Jim Clark, Kevin O’Mahony, and Sylvain Pronovost.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek McColl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada

About this paper

Cite this paper

McColl, D. et al. (2018). Crew Performance and Situation Awareness in Three UAS GCS Layouts. In: Chen, J. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 595. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60384-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60384-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60383-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60384-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics