Abstract
Responsible leadership is a topic that is still under research. The complexity of the issue requires deeper involvement of researchers. Playing the role of a university leader imposes the duty of being responsible. Leaders should be responsible not only towards the stakeholders of the organization they manage, but also for the expected results of the actions predicted by the institution itself. It is noteworthy that there exists an empirically proved relationship between the quality of school leadership and student achievement. Building a professional community of teachers is the key to improve students’ achievements. Results of newly implemented programs should be duly assessed by universities. The conclusions should be then discussed and the feedback should influence future changes in programs. It means that every activity of a responsible university leader should be focused primarily on stakeholders’ needs. The article was based on an analysis of the literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pless, N.M., Maak, T.: Responsible leadership: pathways to the future. J. Bus. Ethics 98, 3–13 (2011)
Pless, N.M., Maak, T., Waldman, D.A.: Different approaches toward doing the right thing: mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 26, 51–65 (2012)
Pless, N.M., Maak, T., Stahl, G.K.: Promoting corporate social responsibility and sustainable development through management development: what can be learned from international service learning programs? Hum. Resour. Manage. 51(6), 873–904 (2012)
Maak, T.: Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. J. Bus. Ethics 74, 329–343 (2007)
Balkundi, P., Kilduff, M.: The ties that lead: a social network approach to leadership. Leadersh. Q. 16, 941–961 (2005)
Ayios, A., Jeurissen, R., Manning, P., Spence, L.J.: Social capital: a review from an ethics perspective. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 23(1), 108–124 (2014)
Painter-Morland, M.: Systemic leadership and the emergence of ethical responsiveness. J. Bus. Ethics 82, 509–524 (2008)
The Wallace Foundation: The School Principal as Leader: Going Schools to Better Teaching and Learning, pp. 1–26 (2013)
Mazzeo, C.: Frameworks of state: assessment policy in historical perspective. Teach. College Rec. 103, 367–398 (2001)
Freeman Jr., S., Kochan, F.: The role of assessment and accountability in higher education doctoral programs: a presidential perspective. Int. J. Educ. Leadersh. Prep. 7(2), 1–13 (2012)
Razavi, S.M., Safari, H., Shafie, H.: Relationships among service quality, customer satisfaction and customer perceived value: evidence from Iran’s software industry. J. Manage. Strat. 3(3), 28–37 (2012)
Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M.J.: Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm, 7th edn. New York, McGraw-Hill (2017)
Rayner, S., Fuller, M., McEwen, L., Roberts, H.: Managing leadership in the UK university: a case for researching the missing professoriate? Stud. High. Educ. 35(6), 617–631 (2010)
Tight, M.: What does it mean to be a professor? High. Educ. Rev. 34, 15–31 (2002)
Želvys, R.: Švietimo organizacijų vadyba, p. 8. VU leidykla, Vilnius (2003)
Scott, P.: The changing role of the university in the production of new knowledge. Tert. Educ. Manage. 3(1), 5–14 (1997)
Brown, F.W., Moshavi, D.: Herding academic cats: faculty reactions to transformational and contingent reward leadership by department chairs. J. Leadersh. Stud. 8(3), 79–94 (2002)
Cragg, W.: Business ethics and stakeholder theory. Bus. Ethics Q. 12(2), 113–142 (2002)
Koehn, D., Ueng, J.: Evaluating the evaluators: should investors trust corporate governance metrics ratings? J. Manage. Gov. 9, 111–128 (2005)
Huba, M.E., Freed, J.E.: Learning-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (2001)
Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E.: The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20(1), 65–91 (1995)
Spence, L.J., Coles, A.-M., Harris, L.: The forgotten stakeholder? Ethics and social responsibility in relation to competitors. Bus. Soc. Rev. 106(4), 331–352 (2001)
Ross, J., Winchell, W.O.: Production and Quality. American Society for Quality, Milwaukee (1989)
Crosby, P.B.: Quality is Free. Mentor/NewAmerican Library, New York (1979)
Jacques, M.L.: The call of quality: doing right things right. Qual. Prog. 32(9), 48–54 (1999)
Petrick, J.A., Manning, G.E.: Paradigm shifts in quality management and ethics development. Bus. Forum 18(4), 15–17 (1993)
Nayebpour, M.R., Koehn, D.: The ethics of quality: problems and preconditions. J. Bus. Ethics 44(1), 37–48 (2003)
Lee, L.-S., Ko, H.-M., Wang, M.-T., Pan, Y.-J.: Assessing the quality of the business and management education in higher education. Bus. Econ. Res. 1–10 (2014)
Adler, P.S., Kwon, S.-W.: Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manage. Rev. 27(1), 17–40 (2002)
Portes, A.: Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 24, 1–24 (1998)
Cannon, J.P., Perreault Jr., W.D.: Buyer–seller relationships in business markets. J. Mark. Res. 36, 439–460 (1999)
Jap, S.D., Ganesan, S.: Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. J. Mark. Res. 37, 227–245 (2000)
Levinson, H.: Wither academia? Psychol. Manage. J. 13(4), 210–222 (2010)
Abidin, M.: Higher education quality: perception differences among internal and external stakeholders. Int. Educ. Stud. 8(12), 185–192 (2015)
Boyle, A., Abdullah, A.: Factors influencing engagement with higher education pathway programs. J. Dev. Arts 49(5), 169–182 (2015). Special Issue on Kuala Lumpur Conference Held in August 2014
ACTA: American Council of Trustees and Alumni: Implementing Governance of NEW ERA. An Action Plan for Higher Education Trustees. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED553424.pdf
Freeman, S., Kochan, F.: The role of assessment and accountability in higher education doctoral programs: a presidential perspective. Int. J. Educ. Leadersh. Prep. 7(2), 1–3 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Geryk, M. (2018). University Leaders Responsibilities in Carrying New Programs into Practice. In: Kantola, J., Barath, T., Nazir, S. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 594. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60372-8_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60372-8_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60371-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60372-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)