Advertisement

The Mixed Method for Sustainability Assessment of Remanufacturing Process Using Grey Decision Making

  • Paulina Golinska-Dawson
  • Monika Kosacka
  • Rafał Mierzwiak
  • Karolina Werner-Lewandowska
Chapter
Part of the EcoProduction book series (ECOPROD)

Abstract

Sustainability assessment is not an easy task especially in case of small and medium size remanufacturing companies. The remanufacturing process is characterized by high level of uncertainty regarding its timing, quality and quantity of its outputs. Our previous literature studies have showed that there is lack of a simple method for assessment of sustainability dedicated to SMEs in remanufacturing sector. The challenge is to combine the expert’s knowledge and the numerical data. The aim of this chapter is to present a mixed method for assessing the sustainability with the use of Grey Decision Making. The application of the Grey Decision Making (GDM) allows carrying out of the assessment process in a quantifiable way, even with uncertain and incomplete data. The proposed method aims to assess the class of the sustainability, to identify the weaknesses in current operations and then to facilitate making priorities for the improvements action which should to be taken in order to achieve a better sustainability class. The chapter presents also IT tools which was designed to facilitate the assessment process.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter refers to the research financed by the Narodowe Centrum Badan i Rozwoju NCBiR (National Centre for Research and Development) in the framework of the German-Polish cooperation for sustainable development, project “Sustainability in remanufacturing operations (SIRO)”, grant no WPN/2/2012.

References

  1. Akay D, Atak M (2007) Grey prediction with rolling mechanism for electricity demand forecasting of Turkey. Energy 32Google Scholar
  2. Chen D, Thiede S, Schudeleit T, Herrmann C (2014) A holistic and rapid sustainability assessment tool for manufacturing SMEs. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 63(1):437–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deng JL (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. J Grey Syst 1(1):1–24Google Scholar
  4. Feng SC, Joung CB (2009) An overview of a proposed measurement infrastructure for sustainable manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 7th global conference on sustainable manufacturing, vol 355, p 360, Chennai, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2013) Sustainability reporting guidelines. http://www.385globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3.1Guidelinesncl-Technical Protocol.pdf. Accessed 04 386 Dec 2013
  6. Golinska P, Kosacka M, Mierzwiak R, Werner-Lewandowska K (2015) Grey decision making as a tool for the classification of the sustainability level of remanufacturing companies. J Clean Prod 105:28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Golinska P, Kübler F (2014) The method for assessment of the sustainability maturity in remanufacturing companies. Proc CIRP 15:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hacking T, Guthrie P (2008) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated and sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(2):73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris R (1998) Introduction to decision making, virtual salt. http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2014
  10. Hanbin K (2014) Grey numbers in multiple criteria decision analysis and conflict resolution. PhD thesis available at www.uwspace.uwaterloo.cai/view.php?id=3641
  11. Irmen A (2015) What is economic growth? Powerpoint presentation for SESI lecture on the 26th Oct 2015. Available from http://moodle.flshase.uni.lu/course/view.php?id=3641
  12. Joung CB, Carrell J, Sarkar P, Feng SC (2012) Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol Ind 24:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krajnc D, Glavic P (2005) A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resour Conserv Recycl 43(2):189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li GD, Yamaguchi D, Nagai M (2007) A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Math Comput Model 46(3):573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu S, Lin Y, Forrest JYL (2010) Grey systems: theory and applications, vol 68. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  16. Moldavska A, Welo T (2015) On the applicability of sustainability assessment tools in manufacturing. Proc CIRP 29:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60(3):498–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pope J, Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A (2004) Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(6):595–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosen MA, Kishawy HA (2012). Sustainable manufacturing and design: concepts, practices and needs. Sustainability 4(2):154–174Google Scholar
  20. Sachs J (2015) The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schau E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M (2012) Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators. J Remanufact 2(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 15(2012):281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh S, Olugu EU, Fallahpour A (2014) Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(5):847–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sundin E, Lee HM (2011) In what way is remanufacturing good for the environment? In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing (EcoDesign-11), 30 Nov–2 Dec, Kyoto, Japan, pp 551–556Google Scholar
  25. Tepelmann T (2013) A holistic sustainability guide to support factory layout development (Diploma thesis). Technische Universitat BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  26. Thiede S, Posselt G, Herrmann C (2013) SME appropriate concept for continuously improving the energy and resource efficiency in manufacturing companies. CIRP J Manufact Sci Technol 6(3):204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. United Nations (UN) (2007) Indicators for sustainable development. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf. Accessed 06 Dec 2013)
  28. Veleva V, Ellenbecker M (2001) Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. J Clean Prod 9(6):519–49Google Scholar
  29. Yang Y, John R (2012) Grey sets and greyness. Inform Sci 185(1):249–264Google Scholar
  30. Wang T, Liou M, Hung H (2005) Application of grey theory on forecasting the exchange rate between TWD and USD. In: International conference on business and information, Academy of Taiwan Information System Research and Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, 14–15 July 2005Google Scholar
  31. WCED (1987) World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A, Turskis Z, Tamosaitiene J (2009) Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers. Inform Lith Acad Sci 20(2):305–320Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paulina Golinska-Dawson
    • 1
  • Monika Kosacka
    • 1
  • Rafał Mierzwiak
    • 1
  • Karolina Werner-Lewandowska
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering ManagementPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations