Sustainability Assessment in Remanufacturing Companies—Qualitative Approach
In the last three decades the concept of sustainability has gained a growing attention. There are different initiatives around the world which aim to provide methods and tools for sustainability assessment at a company level. The majority of existing quantitative methods require extended scope of data to be collected and analyzed. Small and medium size remanufacturing enterprises lack the know-how and technical resources to apply them. For this reason there is still research gap regarding the qualitative, easy applicable methods for sustainability assessment, which might be applied, based on expert’s knowledge. The aim of this chapter is to present a new qualitative method, which provides cross company valid sustainability assessment criteria. The method allows assessing the level of maturity of resources utilization in a company with regards to the three dimensions of sustainability. The chapter presents the research methodology and the results of the application of the method in the companies.
KeywordsRemanufacturing operations Maturity level Sustainability assessment
This work refers to the research financed by the Narodowe Centrum Badan i Rozwoju NCBiR (National Centre for Research and Development) and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the German-Polish cooperation for sustainable development, project “Sustainability in remanufacturing operations (SIRO)”, grant no WPN/2/2012 and (01RS1204A). The authors solemnly are responsible for the content of this publication.
- Golińska P (2013) Logistyka zwrotna. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, PoznańGoogle Scholar
- GRI—Global Reporting Initiative (2002a) The global reporting initiative—an overview. Global Reporting Initiative, Boston, USA, Available at www.globalreporting.org
- GRI—Global Reporting Initiative (2002b) Sustainability reporting guidelines 2002 on economic and social performance. Global Reporting Initiative, Boston, USA, Available at www.globalreporting.org
- ISO/IEC 15504-1 (2004) Information technology—process assessment—part 1: concepts and vocabularyGoogle Scholar
- Kim HJ, Severengiz S, Skerlos SJ, Seliger G (2008) Economic and environmental assessment of remanufacturing in the automotive industry. In: LCE 2008: 15th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering: conference proceedings. Sydney, pp 195–200Google Scholar
- Nasr N, Thurston M (2006) Remanufacturing: a key enabler to sustainable product systems. Rochester Institute of Technology, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sundin E, Bras B (2005) Making service selling environmentally and economically beneficial through product remanufacturing. J Clean ProdGoogle Scholar
- Sundin E, Lee HM (2011) In what way is remanufacturing good for the environment? In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing (EcoDesign-11), 30 Nov–2 Dec, Kyoto, Japan, pp 551–556Google Scholar
- Sundin E, Östlin J, Björkman M (2008) Why is remanufacturing more successful in the United States than in Sweden? In: Proceedings of 15th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 17–19 March, pp 247–251Google Scholar