Advertisement

Simulation Modelling of Remanufacturing Process and Sustainability Assessment

  • Paulina Golinska-Dawson
  • Pawel Pawlewski
Chapter
Part of the EcoProduction book series (ECOPROD)

Abstract

Modelling of the remanufacturing process is challenging. The flows of materials are not, as transparent as in the primary production process. The logic of the remanufacturing process requires that products are disassembled and after reprocessing they are reassembled. Not all components and materials can be fully recovered and some of them need to be replaced. The literature on remanufacturing process modelling using simulation approach is very limited. In this chapter we present how a simulation can be used to model remanufacturing process. Moreover we propose set of indicators which allow assessing the environmental, economic and social impact of different variants of remanufacturing process organization.

Keywords

Remanufacturing Simulation Sustainability assessment Indicators 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter presents to results of the research financed by the NCBiR (The National Center for Research and Development) in the framework of the German-Polish cooperation for sustainable development, project “Sustainability in remanufacturing operations (SIRO)”, grant no WPN/2/2012.

References

  1. Abdul-Kader W, Haque MS (2011) Sustainable tyre remanufacturing: an agent-based simulation modelling approach. Int J Sustain Eng 4(4):330–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbey JD, Meloy MG, Guide VDR, Atalay S (2015) Remanufactured products in closed-loop supply chains for consumer goods. Prod Operat Manag 24(3):488–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew-Munot M, Ibrahim RN (2013) Development and analysis of mathematical and simulation models of decision-making tools for remanufacturing. Prod Plan Control 24(12):1081–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APSRG (2014) APSRG report triple win. Econ Soc Environ Remanuf, December 2014. Available from: www.policyconnect.org.uk/apsrg
  5. Bebbington J, Brown J, Frame B (2007) Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecol Econ 61:224–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butzer S, Schötz S, Steinhilper R (2016) Remanufacturing process assessment–a holistic approach. Proc CIRP 52:234–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. COM (2015) COM 2015/595: proposal for a directive of the european parliament and of the council, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:c2b5929d-999e-11e5-b3b7-01aa75ed71a1.0018.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
  8. Gagnon RJ, Morgan SD (2014) Remanufacturing scheduling systems: an exploratory analysis comparing academic research and industry practice. Int J Rapid Manufact 4(2–4):179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Golinska-Dawson P, Pawlewski P (2015a) Multimodal approach for modelling of the materials flow in remanufacturing process. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(3):2133–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Golinska-Dawson P, Pawlewski P (2015b) Modelling of the remanufacturing process from a sustainable perspective. In: 2015 IEEE 20th conference on emerging technologies & factory automation (ETFA), pp 1–8. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  11. Golinska-Dawson P, Kosacka M, Nowak A (2015) The survey on the challenges of organization of automotive component remanufacturing in small-sized companies in Poland. In: Toward sustainable operations of supply chain and logistics systems, pp 241–252. Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
  12. Guide VDR Jr (2000) Production planning and control for remanufacturing. J Operat Manag 18:467–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gutowski TG, Sahni S, Boustani A, Graves SC (2011) Remanufacturing and energy savings. Environ Sci Technol 45(10):4540–4547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang SH, Dismukes JP, Shi J, Su QI, Razzak MA, Bodhale R, Robinson DE (2003) Manufacturing productivity improvement using effectiveness metrics and simulation analysis. Int J Prod Res 41(3):513–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim H-J, Skerlos S, Severengiz S, Seliger G (2009) Characteristics of the automotive remanufacturing enterprise with an economic and environmental evaluation of alternator products. Int J Sustain Manufact 1(4):437–449. doi: 10.1504/IJSM.2009.031363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim HJ, Severengiz S, Skerlos SJ, Seliger G (2008) Economic and environmental assessment of remanufacturing in the automotive industry. In: LCE 2008: 15th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering: conference proceedings. Sydney, NSW, pp 195–200Google Scholar
  17. Kosacka M, Golinska-Dawson P, Mierzwiak R (2015) Sustainability classification for SMEs from the remanufacturing sector. Chiang Mai Univ J Natural Sci 14(4):321–338Google Scholar
  18. Ismail NH, Mandil G, Zwolinski P (2014) A remanufacturing process library for environmental impact simulations. J Remanufact 4(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moon YB (2016) Simulation modeling for sustainability: a review of the literature. Int J Sustain Eng (Aug/2016)Google Scholar
  20. Östlin J, Sundin E, Björkman M (2009) Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies. J Clean Prod 17(11):999–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Qingli D, Hao S, Hui Z (2008). Simulation of remanufacturing in reverse supply chain based on system dynamics. In: 2008 International conference on service systems and service management, pp 1–6. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  22. Saavedra YM, Barquet AP, Rozenfeld H, Forcellini FA, Ometto AR (2013) Remanufacturing in Brazil: case studies on the automotive sector. J Clean Prod 53:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seitz M, Peattie K (2004) Meeting the closed-loop challenge: the case of remanufacturing. Calif Manag Rev 46(2):74–78Google Scholar
  24. Schau EM, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M (2012) Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators. J Remanufact 2(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schau EM, Traverso M, Lehmann A, Finkbeiner M (2011) Life cycle costing in sustainability assessment—a case study of remanufactured alternators. Sustainability 3(11):2268–2288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 15(1):281–299Google Scholar
  27. Stanfield PM, King RE, Hodgson TJ (2006) Determining sequence and ready times in a remanufacturing system. IIE Trans 38(7):565–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steinhilper R (1998) Remanufacturing: the ultimate form of recycling. Fraunhofer IRB VerlagGoogle Scholar
  29. Sundin E, Lee HM (2012) In what way is remanufacturing good for the environment? Design for innovative value towards a sustainable society: proceedings of EcoDesign 2012: 7th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing. Springer, New York, pp 552–557Google Scholar
  30. Sutherland JW, Adler DP, Haapala KR, Kumar V (2008) A comparison of manufacturing and remanufacturing energy intensities with application to diesel engine production. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Warsen J, Laumer M, Momberg W (2011) Comparative life cycle assessment of remanufacturing and new manufacturing of a manual transmission. In: Hesselbach J, Herrmann C (eds) Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering ManagementPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations