Sustainability in Remanufacturing Process—The Challenges for Its Assessment

  • Paulina Golinska-Dawson
Part of the EcoProduction book series (ECOPROD)


The sustainability assessment gains a lot of interest among researchers and practitioners. The concept of sustainability is not precisely defined. For that reason translating it into measurable process characteristics is a challenge. The aim of this chapter is to identify the key requirements for measuring remanufacturing process sustainability, and addressing all three aspects of the triple bottom line—environment, economy and society. The literature provides many examples on environmental and economic benefits of remanufacturing. However there is research gap regarding the sustainability assessment methods and tools, which might be used to analyze the performance of remanufacturing process. This chapter presents the discussion on the concept of sustainability at a company level, and then the problems of sustainability performance measurement are addressed. The challenges for sustainability assessment of remanufacturing process are identified.


Remanufacturing Sustainability assessment methods Performance measurement OECD toolkit 



This chapter refers to results of the research financed by the NCBiR (The National Center for Research and Development) in the framework of the German-Polish cooperation for sustainable development, project” Sustainability in remanufacturing operations (SIRO)”, grant no WPN/2/2012.


  1. Abdul-Kader W, Haque MS (2011) Sustainable tyre remanufacturing: an agent-based simulation modelling approach. Int J Sustainable Eng 4(4):330–347Google Scholar
  2. Amaya J, Zwolinski P, Brissaud D (2010) Environmental benefits of parts remanufacturing: the truck injector case, 17th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Hefei, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  3. APSRG (2014) APSRG report triple win: the economic, social and environmental case for remanufacturing, Dec 2014 available from:
  4. Barquet AP, Rozenfeld H, Forcellini FA (2013) An integrated approach to remanufacturing: model of a remanufacturing system. J Remanufact 3(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future, World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED)Google Scholar
  6. COM 2015/614, Closing the loop—an EU action plan for the circular economyGoogle Scholar
  7. Fatimah YA, Biswas W, Mazhar I, Islam MN (2013) Sustainable manufacturing for Indonesian small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): the case of remanufactured alternators. J Remanufact 3(1):6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng SC, Joung CB, Li G (2010) Development overview of sustainable manufacturing metrics. In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Hefei, PRCGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng SC, Joung CB (2009) An overview of a proposed measurement infrastructure for sustainable manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 7th global conference on sustainable manufacturing, Chennai, India, pp 355–360Google Scholar
  10. Guide Jr VDR, Srivastava R (1997) Buffering from material recovery uncertainty in a recoverable manufacturing environment. J Oper Res Soc, 519–529Google Scholar
  11. Gutowski TG, Sahni S, Boustani A, Graves SC (2011) Remanufacturing and energy savings. Environ Sci Technol 45(10):4540–4547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devuyst D, Hens L, De Lannoy W (2001) How green is the city? Sustainability assessment and the management of urban environments. Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Hacking T, Guthrie P (2008) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated and sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(2):73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kerr W, Ryan C (2001) Eco-efficiency gains from remanufacturing: a case study of photocopier remanufacturing at Fuji Xerox Australia. J Clean Prod 9(1):75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim H-J, Skerlos S, Severengiz S, Seliger G (2009) Characteristics of the automotive remanufacturing enterprise with an economic and environmental evaluation of alternator products. Int J Sustain Manufact 1(4):437–449. doi: 10.1504/IJSM.2009.031363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim HJ, Severengiz S, Skerlos SJ, Seliger G (2008) Economic and environmental assessment of remanufacturing in the automotive industry. In: LCE 2008: 15th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering: conference proceedings. Sydney, NSW, pp 195–200Google Scholar
  17. Ijomah WL, Childe S, McMahon C (2004) Remanufacturing: a key strategy for sustainable development. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on design and manufacture for sustainable development, 1–2 Sep 2004, Loughborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Jawahir IS, Dillon OW (2007) Sustainable manufacturing processes: new challenges for developing predictive models and optimization techniques. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on sustainable manufacturing, Montreal, Canada, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  19. Lind S, Olsson D, Sundin E (2014) Exploring inter-organizational relationships in automotive component remanufacturing. J Remanufact 4(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu S, Leat M, Smith MH (2011) State-of-the-art sustainability analysis methodologies for efficient decision support in green production operations. Int J Sustain Eng 4(3):236–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu T, Gupta A, Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Feng SC, Dillon Jr OW, Jawahir IS (2011) A framework of product and process metrics for sustainable manufacturing. In: Advances in sustainable manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, pp 333–338Google Scholar
  22. Lundmark P, Sundin E, Björkman M (2009) Industrial challenges within the remanufacturing system. In 3rd Swedish production symposium 2009. Göteborg, pp 132–138Google Scholar
  23. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide, OECD Publication 302008251E1. OECD–European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  24. Nasr N, Hilton B, German R (2011) A framework for sustainable production and a strategic approach to a key enabler: remanufacturing. In: Advances in sustainable manufacturing. Springer, pp 191–196Google Scholar
  25. OECD (2011) Sustainable manufacturing indicators. OECD better policies for better lives.
  26. OECD (2015) Sustainable manufacturing indicators portal. Accessed 2 Feb 2015,
  27. Oiko OT, Barquet APB, Ometto A (2011) Business issues in remanufacturing: two Brazilian cases in automotive industry. In: 18th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Braunschweig. Proceedings of the 18th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineeringGoogle Scholar
  28. Östlin J (2008) On remanufacturing systems: analyzing and managing material flows and remanufacturing processes. Linkoping University DissertationGoogle Scholar
  29. Östlin J, Sundin E, Bjorkman M (2009) Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies. J Clean Prod 17(11):999–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ovchinnikov A, Blass V, Raz G (2014) Economic and environmental assessment of remanufacturing strategies for product+ service firms. Prod Oper Manage 23(5):744–761Google Scholar
  31. Radermacher W (2005) The reduction of complexity by means of indicators–case studies in the environmental domain. In: OECD (eds) Statistics, knowledge and policy: key indicators to inform decision making, pp 163–173Google Scholar
  32. Schau E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M (2012) Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators, J Remanufacturing 2(1):1–14Google Scholar
  33. Searcy C (2012) Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: a review and research agenda. J Bus Ethics 107:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Searcy C (2014) Measuring enterprise sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 25(2):120–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 15(1) (2012):281–299Google Scholar
  36. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 15(1):281–299Google Scholar
  37. Steinhilper R (1998) Remanufacturing: the ultimate form of recycling. Fraunhofer IRB VerlagGoogle Scholar
  38. Sundin E, Lee HM (2012) In what way is remanufacturing good for the environment? Design for innovative value towards a sustainable society: proceedings of EcoDesign 2012: 7th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing. Springer, New York, pp 552–557Google Scholar
  39. Sutherland JW, Adler DP, Haapala KR, Kumar V (2008) A comparison of manufacturing and remanufacturing energy intensities with application to diesel engine production. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson JM, Piya C, Shin YC, Zhao F, Ramani K (2014) Remanufacturing of turbine blades by laser direct deposition with its energy and environmental impact analysis. J Clean Prod 80:170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Um J, Yoon J, Suh S (2008) An architecture design with data model for product recovery management systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:1175–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. US Department of Commerce (2011) Sustainable manufacturing initiative website,

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering ManagementPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations