Vleeshuis Museum: Antwerp (Belgium)



Understanding the indoor building microclimate means also verifying how the building interacts with the outdoor microclimate and how homogeneous this interaction is inside the building. As the hygrothermal dynamics influence both building users’ thermal comfort and state of conservation of movable heritage, it is essential, especially in historic buildings and museums, to combine both indoor building microclimate diagnosis and certification in an iterative process.

This chapter reports on a microclimate monitoring of Vleeshuis museum in Antwerp (Belgium). The onsite monitoring activities are intended at acquiring data for indoor microclimate diagnosis and certification. The building diagnosis was performed by means of descriptive statistics analysis, while the building microclimate certification, limited to the thermal comfort, was implemented on the basis of a certification model introduced in Chap.  6 of this book.


  1. Camuffo D, Della Valle A, Bertolin C, Bristot A (2010) Humidity and environmental diagnostics in Palazzo Grimani, Venice. In: Del Curto D (ed) Indoor environment and preservation, climate control in museums and historic buildings. Nardini Editore, Florence, pp 45–50Google Scholar
  2. Camuffo D, Pagan E, Schellen H, Limpens Neilen D, Kozlowski R, Bratasz L, et al (2007) Church Heating and Preservation of the Cultural Heritage: A Practical Guide to the Pros and Cons of the Various Heating Systems. Electa Mon. Milan: Electa MondadoriGoogle Scholar
  3. EN 15251 (2007) Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings- addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics contentsGoogle Scholar
  4. EN 15757 (2010) Conservation of cultural property-specifications for temperature and relative humidity to limit climate-induces mechanical damage in organic hygroscopic materialsGoogle Scholar
  5. Herk JV (1939) Het Vleeshuis Te Antwerpen. Jaarboek van Antwerpen’s Oudheidkundige kringGoogle Scholar
  6. ISO 7730 (2005) Ergonomics of the thermal environment — analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteriaGoogle Scholar
  7. Litti G, Khoshdel S, Audenaert S, Braet J (2015a) Hygrothermal performance evaluation of traditional brick masonry in historic buildings. Energy and Buildings 105:393–411Google Scholar
  8. Litti G, Audenaert A, Braet J, Fabbri K, Weeren A (2015b) Synthetic Scan and Simultaneous Index Aimed at the Indoor Environmental Quality Evaluation and Certification for People and Artworks in Heritage Buildings. Energy Procedia 78:1365–1370Google Scholar
  9. Lucchi E (2016) Thermal transmittance of historical brick masonries: A comparison among standard data, analytical calculation procedures, and in situ heat flow meter measurements. Energy and Buildings 151:393–405Google Scholar
  10. Silva HE, Henriques FMA (2014) Microclimatic analysis of historic buildings: a new methodology for temperate climates. Build Environ 82:381–387Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Applied Engineering SciencesUniversiteit AntwerpenAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Applied Engineering SciencesUniversiteit AntwerpenAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations