Advertisement

Sex, Violence and Politics: The Research Problem

  • José Fernando Serrano-Amaya
Chapter
  • 237 Downloads
Part of the Global Queer Politics book series (GQP)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the reader to the politics of homophobia, and to the approach taken in the research for this book. It discusses the ways anti-homosexual violence and political homophobia are normally conceptualised and the problematic dominance of abstract, generalised concepts of violence. Doing research on violence in political conflicts, and reconstructing events that caused suffering, raise serious problems of ethics. Theoretical questions and ethical questions are connected; presenting them together in this chapter starts a discussion of the politics of knowledge and the political uses of knowledge.

References

  1. Agathangelou, A.M. 2010. Bodies of Desire, Terror and the War in Eurasia: Impolite Disruptions of (Neo) Liberal Internationalism, Neoconservatism and the ‘New’ Imperium. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 38 (3): 693–722.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Adison-Wesley, Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Altman, D. 2001. Global Sex. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbarin, O.A., L. Richter, T. de Wet, and A. Wachtel. 1998. Ironic Trends in the Transition to Peace: Criminal Violence Supplants Political Violence in Terrorizing South African Blacks. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 4 (3): 283–305. doi: 10.1207/s15327949pac0403_6.
  5. Bennett, J. 2010. “Circles and Circles”: Notes in African Feminist Debates Around Gender and Violence in the c21. Feminist Africa 14: 21–47.Google Scholar
  6. Boellstorff, T. 2004. The Emergence of Political Homophobia in Indonesia: Masculinity and National Belonging. Ethnos 69 (4): 465–486.Google Scholar
  7. Bosia, M., and M. Weiss. 2013. Political Homophobia in Comparative Perspective. In Global Homophobia, ed. M. Weiss and M. Bosia, 1–29. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, E. 1993. Sexual Orientation and the Constitution: A Test Case for Human Rights. South African Law Journal 110 (3): 450–472.Google Scholar
  9. Comaroff, J., and J. Comaroff. 2007. Law and Disorder in the Postcolony. Social Anthropology 15 (2): 133–152.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, R. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2000. Arms and the Man: Using the New Research on Masculinity to Understand Violence and Promote Peace in the Contemporary World. In Male Roles, Masculinities and Violence: A Culture of Peace Perspective, ed. I. Breines, R. Connell, and I. Eide, 21–33. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2005. Masculinities. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2009. Gender. Cambridge, Oxford/Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2011. Confronting Equality: Gender, Knowledge and Global Change. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2012. Gender, Health and Theory: Conceptualizing the Issue, in Local and World Perspective. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 74 (11): 1675–1683. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006.
  16. Connell, R., and J. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society 19 (6): 829–859.Google Scholar
  17. Corrales, J. 2015. The Politics of LGBT Rights in Latin America and the Caribbean: Research Agendas. ERLACS (100): 53. doi: 10.18352/erlacs.10126.
  18. Currier, A. 2010. Political Homophobia in Postcolonial Namibia. Gender & Society 24 (1): 110–129.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2011. Representing Gender and Sexual Dissidence in Southern Africa. Qualitative Sociology 34 (3): 463–481.Google Scholar
  20. Das, V. 1995. Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2000. Violence and Subjectivity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2008. Violence, Gender, and Subjectivity. Annual Review of Anthropology 37 (1): 283–299.Google Scholar
  23. Enloe, C. 2008. Afterword: Hegemonic Masculinities in International Politics. Men and Masculinities 10 (4): 457–459.Google Scholar
  24. Fassin, D. 2010. El irresistible ascenso del derecho a la vida. Razón humanitaria y justicia social/The irresistible rise of the right to life. Humanitarian reason and social justice/L’irrésistible ascension du droit à la vie. Raison humanitaire et justice sociale. Revista de Antropologia Social 19 (Journal Article): 191.Google Scholar
  25. Franke, K.M. 2007. Los Usos del Sexo. Revista de Estudios Sociales (28): 16–43.Google Scholar
  26. Friedman, E.J. 1998. Paradoxes of Gendered Political Opportunity in the Venezuelan Transition to Democracy. Latin American Research Review 33 (3): 87–135.Google Scholar
  27. Fry, S. (Writer). 2013. Stephen Fry: Out There. In B. Two (Producer), Australia.Google Scholar
  28. Haritaworn, J., A. Kuntsman, and S. Posocco. 2013. Murderous Inclusions Introduction. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15 (4): 445–452. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2013.841568.
  29. Haug, F. 1987. Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Hinojosa, R. 2010. Doing Hegemony: Military, Men, and Constructing a Hegemonic Masculinity. The Journal of Men’s Studies 18 (2): 179.Google Scholar
  31. Hume, M. 2009. Gendered Hierarchies of Violence. Bulletin of Latin American Research 28 (s1): 110–134.Google Scholar
  32. ILGA. 2014. State-Sponsored Homophobia Report and Gay and Lesbian rights maps. Accessed from http://ilga.org/ilga/en/article/1161
  33. Kitzinger, C. 1987. The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Kleinman, A., V. Das, and M.M. Lock, eds. 1997. Social Suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kulick, D. 1998. Travesti: Sex, Gender, and Culture Among Brazilian Transgendered Prostitutes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lempert, R.O. 2001. Activist Scholarship. Law & Society Review 35 (1): 25–32.Google Scholar
  37. Mason, G. 2002. The Spectacle of Violence: Homophobia, Gender, and Knowledge. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McNay, L. 2000. Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Messerschmidt, J.W. 2010. Hegemonic Masculinities and Camouflaged Politics: Unmasking the Bush Dynasty and Its War Against Iraq. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Moser, C., and F. Clarck. 2001. Gender, Conflict and Building Sustainable Peace: Recent Lessons from Latin America. Gender and Development 9 (3): 29–39.Google Scholar
  41. Múnera, L., ed. 2008. Normalidad y excepcionalidad en la política. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  42. Namaste, V.K. 2000. Invisible Lives: The Erasure of Transsexual and Transgendered People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2012. Sex Change, Social Change: Reflections on Identity, Institutions, and Imperialism. 2nd ed. Toronto: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  44. Naples, N. 1997. A Feminist Revisiting of the Insider/Outsider Debate: The “Outsider Phenomenon” in Rural Iowa. In Reflexivity and Voice, ed. R. Hertz, 70–94. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Noonan, R. 1997. Women Against the State: Political Opportunities and Collective Action Frames in Chile’s Transition to Democracy. In Social Movements. Readings on their Emergence, Mobilization, and Dynamics, ed. D. McAdam and D. Snow, 252–267. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  46. Ordoñez, J.P. 1996. No Human Being Is Disposable: Social Cleansing, Human Rights and Sexual Orientation in Colombia. Washington, DC: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  47. Petchesky, R.P. 2005. Rights of the Body and Perversions of War: Sexual Rights and Wrongs Ten Years Past Beijing. International Social Science Journal 57 (184): 301–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2005.552.x.
  48. Puar, J. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages. Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riles, A. 2006. Anthropology, Human Rights, and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron Cage. American Anthropologist 108 (1): 52–65. doi: 10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.52.
  50. Shefer, T., and K. Ratele. 2011. Racist Sexualisation and Sexualised Racism in Narratives on Apartheid. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 16 (1): 27–48. doi: 10.1057/pcs.2010.38.
  51. Stryker, S. 2008. Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity. Radical History Review 2008 (100): 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Swarr, A.L. 2012. Sex in Transition: Remaking Gender and Race in South Africa. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tomsen, S. 2009. Violence, Prejudice and Sexuality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Transgender-Europe. 2012. Mapping the Legal and Social Situation. Accessed from http://www.transrespect-transphobia.org/
  55. ———. 2014. Trans Murder Monitoring. Accessed from http://www.transrespect-transphobia.org/en_US/tvt-project/tmm-results.htm
  56. Waylen, G. 2010. Gendering Politics and Policy in Transitions to Democracy: Chile and South Africa. Policy and Politics 38 (3): 337–352. doi: 10.1332/030557310x521044.
  57. Weinberg, G.H. 1972. Society and the Healthy Homosexual. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  58. Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Gender & Nation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Fernando Serrano-Amaya
    • 1
  1. 1.BogotaColombia

Personalised recommendations