Skip to main content

End-User Development and Learning in Second Life: The Evolving Artifacts Framework with Application

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in End-User Development

Abstract

We explore the relationship of end-user development (EUD) and learning in a case study informed by a new conceptual framework (evolving artifacts). The case is an online distance education program for training in-service teachers in special education in the 3D virtual world Second Life (SL). The “box,” a specific building block in the SL environment became a multipurpose tool for EUD in the study. The professor of the course designed the learning environment by creating and combining 3D boxes and then used boxes as containers to share course materials to the class. Some of the in-service teachers created boxes to personalize their learning activity. The conceptual framework for analysis integrates EUD concepts and concepts from sociocultural and constructivist learning theories (duality of learning; adaptation). We present an analysis of the participants’ spoken utterances and turn taking around the use of the boxes through the lens of two different EUD and learning situations (technology-adaptation and knowledge-adaptation). We show how participants take up these features to become engaged in the activity. One of the situations required the learners to adopt EUD techniques (technology-adaptation), and the professor used EUD techniques to enable knowledge-adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, R., & Mørch, A. I. (2009). Mutual development: a case study in customer-initiated software product development. In Proceedings IS-EUD 2009 (pp. 31–49). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. C., Wentz, R. K., Woods, M. M. (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: second life as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandini, S., & Simone, C. (2006). EUD as integration of components off-the-shelf: the role of software professionals’ knowledge artifacts. In H. Lieberman, F. Paterno, V. Wulf (Eds.). End-user development (pp. 347–369). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (1998). Appropriation and ontogeny: identifying compatibility between cognitive and sociocultural contributions to adult learning and development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17(1), 21–34.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of methods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabitza, F., & Simone, C. (2017). Malleability in the hands of end users. In F. Paternò & V. Wulf (Eds.). New perspectives in end-user development (pp. 137–164). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, P. (1991). America and the new economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, V., Hartley, M. D., Mørch, A. I. (2015). End-user development in Second Life: meta-design, tailoring, and appropriation. In Proceedings IS-EUD 2015 (pp. 92–108). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, V., Mørch, A. I., Thomassen, I., Hartley, M., Ludlow, B. (2014). Practicing collaboration skills through role-play activities in a 3D virtual world. The new development of technology enhanced learning (pp. 165–184). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M., Audia, S., Burnette, T., Cosgrove, D., Christiansen, K. (2000). Alice: lessons learned from building a 3D system for novices. In Proceedings CHI 2000 (pp. 486–493). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L. S., Smagorinsky, P., Fry, P. G., Konopak, B., Moore, C. (2002). Problems in developing a constructivist approach to teaching: one teacher’s transition from teacher preparation to teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 102(5), 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costabile, M. F., Fogli, D., Lanzilotti, R., Mussio, P., Parasiliti Provenza, L., Piccinno, A. (2008). Advancing end user development through meta-design. In End user computing challenges and technologies: emerging tools and applications (pp. 143–167). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiSessa, A., & Abelson, H. (1986). Boxer: a reconstructible computational medium. Communications of ACM, 29(9), 859–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2003). The appropriation of interactive technologies: some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 465–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Nasr, M. S., & Smith, B. K. (2006). Learning through game modding. Entertainment Computing, 4(1), Article 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.). Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 337–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (1998). Seeding, evolutionary growth and reseeding: constructing, capturing and evolving knowledge in domain-oriented design environments. Automated Software Engineering, 5(4), 447–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2009). End-user development and meta-design: foundations for cultures of participation. In Proceedings IS-EUD 2009 (pp. 3–14). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Fogli, D., & Piccinno, A. (2017). Revisiting and broadening the meta-design framework for end-user development. In F. Paternò & V. Wulf (Eds.). New perspectives in end-user development (pp. 61–98). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fogli, D., & Provenza, L. P. (2012). A meta-design approach to the development of e-government services. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 23, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. (1991). Personalizable groupware: accommodating individual roles and group differences. In Proceedings ECSCW’91 (pp. 17–31). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L., Smagorinsky, P., Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: a theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: a review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, M. D., Ludlow, B. L., Duff, M. C. (2016) Using Second Life in Teacher Preparation: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_iZGKQ6INBxS3hYTHlNbTR3THc/view

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: foundation and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: potential and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, P. (2001). Generic skills for the new economy. Australian National Training Authority. Kensington Park: NCVER Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehne, K., Redmiles, D., Fischer, G. (2011). Extending the meta-design theory: engaging participants as active contributors in virtual worlds. In Proceedings EUD-2011 (pp. 264–269). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, H., Paterno, F., Wulf, V. (Eds.) (2006). End-user development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, T., Dax, J., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2017). A practice-oriented paradigm of end-user development. In F. Paternò & V. Wulf (Eds.). New perspectives in end-user development (pp. 23–42). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., Eastmond, E. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. Transations on Computing Education, 10(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mørch, A. (1995). Application units: basic building blocks of tailorable applications. In B. Blumenthal, J. Gornostaev, C. Unger (Eds.). Selected papers from the 5th East-West Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 45–62). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mørch, A. (1997). Three levels of end-user tailoring: customization, integration, and extension. In M. Kyng, & L. Mathiassen (Eds.). Computers and design in context (pp. 51–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mørch, A. I. (2011). Evolutionary application development: tools to make tools and boundary crossing. In H. Isomäki, & S. Pekkola (Eds.). Reframing humans in information systems development (pp. 151–171). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mørch, A. I. (2016). End-user development and learning in second life: the “box” as multipurpose building block. In A. Blackwell, B. Plimmer, G. Stapleton (Eds.). In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing (pp. 208–212). Washington, DC: IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mørch, A. I., Hartley, M. D., Caruso, V. (2015). Teaching interpersonal problem solving skills using roleplay in a 3D virtual world for special education: a case study in second life. In Proceedings ICALT 2015 (pp. 464–468). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mørch, A. I., Nygård, K. A., Ludvigsen, S. R. (2009). Adaptation and generalisation in software product development. In H. Daniels et al. (Eds.). Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries (pp. 184–205). London: Taylor & Francis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mørch, A. I., Stevens, G., Won, M., Klann, M., Dittrich, Y., Wulf, V. (2004). Component-based technologies for end-user development. Communications of ACM, 47(9), 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mørch, A. I., & Zhu, L. (2013). Component-based design and software readymades. In Proceedings EUD-2013 (pp. 278–283). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., Griffin, P., Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V. (2005). From Tailoring to appropriation support: negotiating groupware usage (PhD Thesis). University of Oulu, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repenning, A., Ioannidou, A., Zola, J. (2000). AgentSheets: end-user programmable simulations. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 3(3), 14. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/3/3/forum/1.html

  • Repenning, A., Webb, D., Ioannidou, A. (2010). Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In Proceedings SIGCSE 2010 (pp. 265–269). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roque, R., Rusk, N., Resnick, M. (2016). Supporting diverse and creative collaboration in the Scratch online community. In U. Cress et al. (Eds.). Mass collaboration and education (pp. 241–256). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: a sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton, & P. Light (Eds.). Learning with computers (pp. 144–161). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardone, N. B., & Devlin-Scherer, R. (2008). Teacher candidates’ views of a multi-user virtual environment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(1), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S., & Palincsar, A. (2013). Sociocultural Theory. http://www.education.com/reference/article/sociocultural-theory/ (Updated on Jul 15, 2013; read on Des 8, 2016).

  • Stevens, G. (2017). Understanding and designing appropriation infrastructure (PhD thesis), Faculty of Economic Disciplines, University of Siegen, Germany. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchounikine, P. (2017). Designing for appropriation: a theoretical account. Human-Computer Interaction, 32(4), 155–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of education vol. 1, (162–163). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of ACM, 49(3), 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won, M., Stiemerling, O., Wulf, V. (2006). Component-based approaches to tailorable systems. In H. Lieberman, F. Paterno, V. Wulf (Eds.). End-user development (pp. 115–141). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., & Golombek, B. (2001). Direct activation. A concept to encourage tailoring activities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(4), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author (Mørch) received funding from Dept. of Education, University of Oslo, to explore Second Life as a platform for distance education courses. The second author (Caruso) was a visiting researcher at Dept. of Education, University of Oslo with a 6 months stipend from University of Palermo while the research was carried out. The third author (Hartley) built the virtual campus on a private island provided by WVU’s College of Education & Human Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders I. Mørch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mørch, A.I., Caruso, V., Hartley, M.D. (2017). End-User Development and Learning in Second Life: The Evolving Artifacts Framework with Application. In: Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds) New Perspectives in End-User Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60290-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60291-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics