Abstract
In order to test Rogers’ (2003) linear and temporal arrangement of innovation diffusion variables in educational contexts, I constructed a Diffusion of Innovations in Education Model (DIEM, Warford 2005). The DIEM, as depicted on page 23 of the article, arranges aspects of educational innovation diffusion from antecedent (background) variables to process dimensions centering on the decision to adopt, and it culminates with consequences variables, which determine either the ultimate rejection or confirmation of the decision to adopt an innovation. This model obviously owes a debt to Rogers, who brought the field from which the model’s name was derived (Diffusion of Innovations) into the social sciences from the field of agriculture (Ryan and Gross 1943). Henrichsen’s (1989) adapted Diffusion of Innovations (DoI) model, which integrated cross-cultural diffusion variables, was also a major influence. The core of the DIEM, however, was informed by a parallel but otherwise ignored strain of diffusion research within the field of education, one that actually preceded Rogers’ rise as the patriarch of DoI.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abdelrehim, S. (2014). The diffusion of edublogs among educators in Egypt. Egypt: American University in Cairo.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Campbell, B. G. (2015). Diffusion of innovations of videoconference technology: An instrumental case study concerning undergraduate degree-seeking nontraditional learners. Doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved NSUWorks, Abraham S. Fischler College of Education. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/fse_etd/5
Carlson, R. O. (1968, March). Summary and critique of educational diffusion research. In research implications for educational diffusion. Major papers presented at the National Conference on Diffusion of Educational Ideas (pp. 4–23). Michigan Vocational Education Research Coordinating Unit, East Lansing, Michigan (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 026 535).
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Are individual differences really individual? Keynote address delivered at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80–91.
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.
Flick, U. (2007). Managing quality in qualitative research. London: Sage.
Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. B. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77, 148–171.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Garleja, R., & Skvorcova, E. (2008, May). Innovations in education and its role in preparing qualified participants. Fifth International Scientific Conference on Business and Management, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York, NY: Back Bay Books.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). Strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Hall, G. E. (1992). The local educational change process and policy implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 877–904.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Henrichsen, L. (1989). The diffusion of innovations in English language teaching: The ELEC efforts in Japan, 1956–1968. NY: Greenwood Press.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Huberman, M. (1983). The role of teacher education in the improvement of educational practice: A linkage model. European Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1), 17–29.
Hunkins, F. P., & Ornstein, A. C. (1989). Curriculum innovation and implementation. Education and Urban Society, 22(1), 105–114.
Jung, C. G. (1967). Two essays in analytical psychology. In G. Adler & R. F. C. Hull (Eds.), Collected works (Vol. 7). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kamau, L. Z. (2014). Applied behavior analysis based interventions in public schools: Understanding factors that hinder adoption, implementation and maintenance (p. 158). Boston: Northeastern University.
Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers in Education, 53, 436–444.
Kinnunen, J. (1996). Gabriel Tarde as a founding father of innovation diffusion research. Acta Sociologica, 39, 431–442.
Kirton, M. J. (2003). Adaption-innovation: In the context of diversity and change. New York: Routledge.
Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). The dynamics of collaborative design: Insights from complex systems and negotiation research. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications (CERA J), 11(3), 201–209.
Leejoeiwara, B. (2013). Modeling adoption intention of online education in Thailand using the extended decomposed theory of planned behavior (DTPB). AU Journal of Management, 11, 13–26.
Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. (1980). Evaluating program implementation. Evaluation Review, 4, 193–214.
Mansilla, V. B., & Jackson, A. (2011). Educating for global competence: Preparing our youth to engage the world. NY: Asia Society.
Markee, N. (1997). SLA research: A resource for changing teachers’ professional cultures? The Modern Language Journal, 81, 80–93.
McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Miles, M. B. (1969). The development of innovative climates in educational organizations (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 030 971). Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
Mort, P. R., & Cornell, F. G. (1941). American schools in transition: How our schools adapt their practices to changing needs, a study of Pennsylvania. New York: Teachers College.
Mort, P. R., & Vincent, W. M. (1954). Introduction to American education. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Nicolescu, B. N., & Petrescu, T. C. (2013). Dynamical systems theory: A powerful tool in the educational sciences. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 581–587.
Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). NY: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M., & Jain, N. (1968). Needed research on diffusion within educational organizations (ERIC document reproduction service no. ED 017 740).
Rogers, E. M., Medina, U. E., Rivera, M. A., & Wiley, C. J. (2005). Complex adaptive systems and the diffusion of innovations. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10, 1–26.
Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.
Tang, H.-W. V., Chang, K., & Sheu, R.-S. (2015). Critical factors for implementing a programme for international MICE professionals: A hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. Current Issues in Tourism. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2015.1053848
Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith by permission of Henry Holt & Company.
Teilhard de Chardin, P. (2008). The phenomenon of man (original published in 1959). New York: Harper Perennial.
Titova E. A. (2014). The role of communication in introducing innovations in education. Economies et Societes, 11(2). http://www.iupr.ru. Retrieved November 8, 2015.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. ed.). Boston: MIT Press
Warford, M. K. (2000). Foreign language teacher educators and the diffusion of educational innovations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Warford, M. K. (2002). Retracing the path to proficiency: FL teacher educators and the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. NECTFL Review, 54, 47–54.
Warford, M. K. (2005). Testing a diffusion of innovations in education model. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10(3), 1–32.
Warford, M. K. (2011). The zone of proximal teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 252–258.
Warford, M. K. (2014). Toward a framework for evaluating online instruction in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42(4), 333–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warford, M.K. (2017). Educational Innovation Diffusion: Confronting Complexities. In: Sidorkin, A., Warford, M. (eds) Reforms and Innovation in Education. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60246-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60246-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60245-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60246-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)