Cultural Dimension Theory Based Simulations for US Army Personnel

  • Brian AnEmail author
  • Donald E. Brown
  • Riannon M. Hazell
  • Peter Grazaitis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10354)


US Military Personnel are constantly operating in culturally diverse operational theaters and among multinational coalitions around the world. Though some cultural and linguistic criteria are considered when filling deployments, cultural missteps continue to plague the success of our combat operations. In order to address the increasing need for cross-culturally competent personnel the Department of Defense (DoD) requires scalable evaluative methods that supplement current measures primarily focused on evaluating linguistic skills for cross-cultural competence. This work investigates the integration of Cultural Dimension Theory and immersive avatar-based gaming systems with the goal of measuring and predicting cross-cultural competence. The objective of this effort is to assess the applicability of Cultural Dimension Theory as a means to interpret perceived cultural differences and to introduce a novel framework by which a Cultural Dimension-based simulation can be developed.


Cultural simulation Avatars Cultural dimension theory 


  1. 1.
    Gallus, J.A., Gouge, M.C., Antolic, E., Fosher, K., Jasparro, V., Coleman, S., Selmeski, B., Klafehn, J.L.: Cross-cultural competence in the department of defense: an annotated bibliography. Technical report, DTIC Document (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mor, S., Morris, M.W., Joh, J.: Identifying and training adaptive cross-cultural management skills: the crucial role of cultural metacognition. Academy Manag. Learn. Educ. 12(3), 453–475 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGuire, G., McGinn, M.G., Weaver, M.N.: Developing and managing cross-cultural competence within the department of defense: Recommendations and learning and assessment (2008).
  4. 4.
    Hofstede, G.H., Hofstede, G.: Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fang, T.: Yin yang: a new perspective on culture. Manage. Organ. Rev. 8(1), 25–50 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trompenaars, F., Hampden-Turner, C.: Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Nicholas Brealey Publishing (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raybourn, E.M.: Applying simulation experience design methods to creating serious game-based adaptive training systems. Interact. Comput. 19(2), 206–214 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tasdemir, S.A., Prasolova-Førland, E.: Visualizing afghan culture in a virtual village for training cultural awareness in military settings. In: 2014 18th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV), pp. 256–261. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heine, S.J., Lehman, D.R., Peng, K., Greenholtz, J.: What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective likert scales? the reference-group effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82(6), 903 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, M.: Hofstede’s cultural dimensions 30 years later: a study of taiwan and the united states. Intercultural Commun. Stud. 15(1), 33 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fernandez, D.R., Carlson, D.S., Stepina, L.P., Nicholson, J.D.: Hofstede’s country classification 25 years later. J. Soc. Psychol. 137(1), 43–54 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moenning, A., Turnbull, B., Abel, D., Meyer, C., Hale, M., Guerlain, S., Brown, D.: Developing avatars to improve cultural competence in us soldiers. In: 2016 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), pp. 148–152. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hofstede, G.: Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 24(4), 411–420 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian An
    • 1
    Email author
  • Donald E. Brown
    • 1
  • Riannon M. Hazell
    • 2
  • Peter Grazaitis
    • 2
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Army Research LaboratoryAdelphiUSA

Personalised recommendations