Skip to main content

Gender Politics in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: A Computer Vision Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling (SBP-BRiMS 2017)

Abstract

Gender plays an important role in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, especially with Hillary Clinton becoming the first female presidential nominee and Donald Trump being frequently accused of sexism. In this paper, we introduce computer vision to the study of gender politics and present an image-driven method that can measure the effects of gender in an accurate and timely manner. We first collect all the profile images of the candidates’ Twitter followers. Then we train a convolutional neural network using images that contain gender labels. Lastly, we classify all the follower and unfollower images. Through a case study of the ‘woman card’ controversy, we demonstrate how gender is informing the 2016 presidential election. Our framework of analysis can be readily generalized to other case studies and elections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By ‘unfollower’, we mean people who previously followed a candidate on Twitter and later unfollowed him/her.

  2. 2.

    For a detailed analysis of follower growth patterns, see [21].

  3. 3.

    http://opencv.org.

  4. 4.

    The full list of label names together with the validation data set and the trained model, is available at the first author’s website.

  5. 5.

    See, for example, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-women.html.

References

  1. Brians, C.L.: Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates, American Politics Research (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burger, J.D., Henderson, J., Kim, G., Zarrella, G.: Discriminating gender on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dolan, K.: Is There a “Gender Affinity Effect” in American Politics? Affect, and Candidate Sex in U.S. House Elections. Political Research Quarterly, Information (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farfade, S.S., Saberian, M., Li, L.-J.: Multi-view face detection using deep convolutional neural networks. In: ICMR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: CVPR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heckman, J.J.: Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1), 153–161 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, G.B., Ramesh, M., Berg, T., Learned-Miller, E.: Labeled faces in the wild: a database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments. Technical report, University of Massachusetts (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jia, S., Cristianini, N.: Learning to classify gender from four million images. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 58, 35–41 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, J.M.: Gender gap in 2012 vote is largest in gallup’s history (2012). http://www.gallup.com/poll/158588/gender-gap-2012-vote-largest-gallup-history.aspx

  10. Ricanek, Jr., K., Tesafaye, T.: Morph: a longitudinal image database of normal adult age-progression. In: 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. King, D.C., Matland, R.E.: Sex and the grand old party: an experimental investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a republican candidate. Am. Politics Res. 74(3), 633–640 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: NIPS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. MacWilliams, M.C.: Forecasting congressional elections using facebook data. PS: Polit. Sci. Politics 48(04), 579–583 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.-Y., Onnela, J.-P., Rosenquist, J.N.: Understanding the demographics of twitter users. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B.R., Smith, N.A.: From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips, P.J., Wechslerb, H., Huangb, J., Raussa, P.J.: The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms. Image Vis. Comput. 16(5), 295–306 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saad, L.: Big gender gap distinguishes election 2000 (2000). http://www.gallup.com/poll/2884/big-gender-gap-distinguishes-election-2000.aspx

  19. Stout, C.T., Kline, R.: Political Behavior (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Y., Li, Y., Luo, J.: Deciphering the 2016 U.S. Presidential campaign in the twitter sphere: a comparison of the Trumpists and Clintonists. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Y., Luo, J., Niemi, R., Li, Y.: To follow or not to follow: analyzing the growth patterns of the Trumpists on Twitter. In: Workshop Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Y., Luo, J., Niemi, R., Li, Y., Hu, T.: Catching fire via ‘Likes’: inferring topic preferences of trump followers on Twitter. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Luo, J.: When follow is just one click away: Understanding twitter follow behavior in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. arXiv:1702.00048 (2017)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Luo, J. (2017). Gender Politics in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: A Computer Vision Approach. In: Lee, D., Lin, YR., Osgood, N., Thomson, R. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10354. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60240-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60240-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60239-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60240-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics