Abstract
Altruism is a human disposition to care for the other. It keeps the community together, but it can also be a vulnerability easily exploited for other purposes. Various social conditions contribute to the suppression of critical thinking: religious traditions and ideologies, unselfishness, ethics of convictions. The lack of critical systems thinking hinders us in being responsible and effective altruists. Rational thinking motivates us to evaluate the quality of the NGO, and the relevance and quality of its presented projects. Criteria are discussed which enable managers and project designers to sort out and appreciate the measurable from the likely immeasurable impact of an intended intervention in a social system in its wider context. These criteria allow potential donors to evaluate and decide whether or not to invest in a given project. By supporting or withholding one’s contributions, the benefactor may press the NGOs and project leaders to act more as responsible and effective altruists, while behaving oneself as a responsible citizen.
I wish to thank Rik Nuytten for his constructive suggestions and improvements of the English text.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Checkland, P. 1981. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley.
Chua, A. 2004. World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. New York: Ancher Books.
Elster, J. 2011. The Valmont Effect: The Warm-Glow Theory of Philanthropy. In Giving Well: The Ethics of Philanthropy, ed. P. Illingworth, T. Pogge, and L. Wenar, 67–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Illingworth, P., T. Pogge, and L. Wenar, eds. 2011b. Giving Back: Norms, Ethics, and Law in the Service of Philanthropy. In Giving Well: The Ethics of Philanthropy, ed. P Illingworth, T. Pogge, and L. Wenar, 196–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karlan, D., and D.H. Wood. 2014. The Effect of Effectiveness: Donor Response to Aid Effectiveness in a Direct Fundraising Experiment. NBER Discussion Papers 20047, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
L’huilier, D., and D. Rolland. 2005. Action Research and Transitional Processes: Risk Prevention in a Hospital in Burundi. In The Transitional Approach in Action, ed. G. Amando and L. Vansina, 175–194. London: Karnac.
MacAskill, W. 2015. Doing Good Better: A Radical New Way to Make a Difference. London: Guardian Books.
Moyo, D. 2006. Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. New York: Farrer, Straen and Giroux.
Porter, M., and M. Kramer. 2011. Creating Shared Values. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 62–77.
Roy, A. 2002. The Algebra of Infinite Justice. London: Flamingo Harper Collins.
Schein, E.H. 2009. Helping: How to Offer, Give, and Receive Help. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Weber, M. 1919. Politik als Berüf: Gezinnungsethik vs. Verantwortungsethik. Frankfurt am Main: Büchergilde Gütenberg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vansina, L. (2018). Is There Space for Rational Thinking in Altruism? From Charity to Philanthropy. In: Langenberg, S., Beyers, F. (eds) Citizenship in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60237-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60237-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60236-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60237-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)